Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 09:21 PM Sep 2014

HRC has just written a glowing review of Kissinger's new book. STILL think we should nominate her? [View all]

(note: read this link first, THEN take the poll.)

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/09/hillary-clinton-henry-kissinger-world-order

Corollary question: if you supported her until you read the link, does this change anything for you? If so, why? If not, why not?


32 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Yes, we should STILL nominate her. This totally doesn't matter.
6 (19%)
We should probably still nominate her, but this bothers me some.
0 (0%)
We probably shouldn't nominate her now, but she could still redeem herself somehow
1 (3%)
We absolutely shouldn't nominate her now.
25 (78%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I didn't support a Clinton candidacy until just a few minutes ago. DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2014 #1
This and sniper fire Politicalboi Sep 2014 #2
I read some of the comments yeoman6987 Sep 2014 #6
People on the internets said that? Oh noes! Good thing polls say otherwise... Metric System Sep 2014 #69
Yeah, because pollsters have really proven to be objective, accurate and reliable. Baitball Blogger Sep 2014 #73
This isn't about her vs. a Repug. It's about nominating her at all. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #18
Ugh. The Clintons never fail to piss me off. Arugula Latte Sep 2014 #3
I honestly do not understand why everyone thinks she's a shoe-in. MelungeonWoman Sep 2014 #4
She's been in the public eye for 23 years XemaSab Sep 2014 #12
what gives you the idea that people in general don't like her? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #26
Maybe he hangs-out with Republicans? 4b5f940728b232b034e4 Sep 2014 #40
HA XemaSab Sep 2014 #42
Shoot, I voted for her in the '08 primaries. MelungeonWoman Sep 2014 #35
You do realize ....Bernie Sanders is not a Democrat right? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #44
If you think there's something wrong with that comment, then alert on it. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #76
HA right.....it wasn't the statement VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #77
And a unknown in 2008 took a 30 point lead from her! nt Logical Sep 2014 #38
and who do YOU think is going to do that this time? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #43
Nobody knew THAT candidate would do it at this point in 2006. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #61
So you want to put all your money on another dark horse rising up? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #78
LOL, who did YOU think might do it last time? You just.... Logical Sep 2014 #87
I think there was Presidential talk for him as soon as he gave that first speech... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #91
I saying people like you were claiming she was unbeatable last time. And Obama destroyed her. You... Logical Sep 2014 #93
but YOU see....everything doesn't happen the same way it did last time now DOES IT? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #94
Because judging by her rhetoric whatchamacallit Sep 2014 #83
Quelle surprise. nonbhn edgineered Sep 2014 #5
She will not get the nomination. ..she loses pipoman Sep 2014 #7
oh really? who? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #46
Anyone who wants change pipoman Sep 2014 #67
comeon....name names....who has a better chance at winning than HRC? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #79
You rest your case? Thank goodness. cherokeeprogressive Sep 2014 #81
Futility. . pipoman Sep 2014 #82
Just one more brick in the wall for me. Motown_Johnny Sep 2014 #8
Yes better her than EW AnalystInParadise Sep 2014 #9
Do you assume that every other state wants our nominee Ken Burch Sep 2014 #10
Wasting keystrokes on that one. nt LeftyMom Sep 2014 #16
Why would you say that? AnalystInParadise Sep 2014 #25
Because I can read. And not really. nt LeftyMom Sep 2014 #27
Ahhh defamation AnalystInParadise Sep 2014 #41
I assume AnalystInParadise Sep 2014 #24
She has no claim to any inherent superiority over any other possible Dem candidate. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #36
she does have the polling numbers to "claim" doesn't she? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #47
So did Ed Muskie, in September of 1970(and I point that out sadly, because I liked Muskie). Ken Burch Sep 2014 #58
NOT HER numbers he didnt....SORRY epic fail! VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #80
All of that means endorsing everything Kissinger ever did doesn't matter? Ken Burch Sep 2014 #89
Except all the states Clinton appeals to... Scootaloo Sep 2014 #56
Well this changes nothing for me Kalidurga Sep 2014 #11
If it's between her and a repub, I'm voting for her justiceischeap Sep 2014 #13
This was about the question of NOMINATING her, not about the fall. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #15
Well, it depends Ken Burch justiceischeap Sep 2014 #68
People been kissing his ass for decades. Rex Sep 2014 #14
True...that doesn't mean it doesn't matter, though. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #17
I think she thinks she has the oval office in the bag. Rex Sep 2014 #21
You see the GOP scared of losing Congress? Really? where did you see that? still_one Sep 2014 #30
Not what I said, reading comprehension skills are in dire need I see. Rex Sep 2014 #84
so educate me, here is your direct quote in the body still_one Sep 2014 #85
I was up for voting against her in the Primaries. Now...well, it has made a difference as to my libdem4life Sep 2014 #19
Yesterday I saw a play about LBJ, "The Great Society" XemaSab Sep 2014 #20
Maybe, but if she did as you say "throw all the troops at it", it would have to be with Congress still_one Sep 2014 #31
Not really. She can send 'em in for sixty days without Congressional approval Ken Burch Sep 2014 #62
yes still_one Sep 2014 #72
I voted "pass" because I didn't think we should nominate her before the Kissinger stuff. n/t winter is coming Sep 2014 #22
It doesn't change my mind as I was already not going to vote for her in the primary davidpdx Sep 2014 #23
I suspect a lot of folks on DU will have a problem if she becomes the nominee still_one Sep 2014 #28
No, we will hold our nose, eat light and take some pepto before casting out ballot for the Dem. LiberalArkie Sep 2014 #70
Don't like any of the choices. MohRokTah Sep 2014 #29
PASS ~ We should let the primaries nominate or not nominate her. Fair is fair. BlueCaliDem Sep 2014 #32
By "we", I meant the party in the primaries, not DU alone. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #34
Since we're on DU... BlueCaliDem Sep 2014 #45
Obviously, I was referring to the primary process Ken Burch Sep 2014 #59
AGREED! VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author indie9197 Sep 2014 #33
Um this is Democratic Underground you are at.....WTF does what Bill Clinton is going to do... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #50
Oh, hell no! Major Hogwash Sep 2014 #37
I don't want to vote for anyone who voted for the Iraq war. nt ZombieHorde Sep 2014 #39
No, absolutely not. She lives in a different world, she obviously wants to be one of them, the sabrina 1 Sep 2014 #48
"she is the last person we need running this country." zappaman Sep 2014 #53
What a fascinating comment.. sabrina 1 Sep 2014 #54
Maybe Henry will vote for her. I won't. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #51
Kissinger. Former Secretary of Hate. Eeeeewww! nt Zorra Sep 2014 #52
I suspect that much of what she does elleng Sep 2014 #55
I thought the revolution was coming BainsBane Sep 2014 #57
You're just baiting here. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #60
I considered it more of a friendly jab BainsBane Sep 2014 #63
The other thread didn't CLAIM that "the revolution was just around the corner" and you know it. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #64
I'm actually not mad at all BainsBane Sep 2014 #65
The person you quoted HAD no valid point, because nobody was doing what he accused people of there. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #66
I will never vote for Hillary Clinton, for anything. Ever. 99Forever Sep 2014 #71
the HORROR!!!!!!! whistler162 Sep 2014 #74
having read the whole thing all the way through justabob Sep 2014 #86
There is nothing in the review that makes what she wrote inoffensive(I read the review). Ken Burch Sep 2014 #90
I never thought we should nominate her. nt LWolf Sep 2014 #75
Kissinger is a fucking monster hifiguy Sep 2014 #88
We should not nominate Hillary. bigwillq Sep 2014 #92
DU was going to nominate her before? joshcryer Sep 2014 #95
I meant the party, not DU. Ken Burch Sep 2014 #97
The poll was on DU. joshcryer Sep 2014 #98
She was never even close to my first choice, to begin with. This just further disappoints me. nomorenomore08 Sep 2014 #96
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»HRC has just written a gl...