Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Self-censorship is censorship. Advocating self-censorship is advocating censorship. [View all]riqster
(13,986 posts)173. On DU, agreed. I was also speaking of speech elsewhere.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
201 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Self-censorship is censorship. Advocating self-censorship is advocating censorship. [View all]
riqster
Jun 2014
OP
Couldn't disagree more - everything should be on the table for discussion and that includes
el_bryanto
Jun 2014
#5
That's exactly my reasoning for hating political correctness. It shuts down discourse
valerief
Jun 2014
#51
And that's the key point isn't it? People should just choose not to be offended.
el_bryanto
Jun 2014
#85
LOL... and this is the crowd that uses 'context' as a defense of TRP's repeated use of misogynistic
redqueen
Jun 2014
#14
No one is trying to tell you what you should find interesting, acceptable, or humorous
gollygee
Jun 2014
#54
So, as long it's only "normal" people who aren't being oppressed, oppression is OK?
riqster
Jun 2014
#193
I actually enjoy unleashing a stream of profanities in a church. YMMV. N/T
Dr Hobbitstein
Jun 2014
#33
DU is based in self and other censorship. otherwise we would accept republicans and other
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#26
There are differences between government censorship, private censorship and self-censorship
onenote
Jun 2014
#48
Your examples don't work, because in America someone would shoot off a gun before the
valerief
Jun 2014
#59
Oh i did not realize that it was suggested that someone 'outside' of our "house"
etherealtruth
Jun 2014
#71
the OP self-censors him/her self in a post critical of censorship lol. now that's funny nt
msongs
Jun 2014
#75
Read it again. He is instructing people about what are and are not acceptable ways to express
Squinch
Jun 2014
#159
That's some pretty nitty-gritty instructions on how you think people should express themselves.
Squinch
Jun 2014
#158
you dont seem to understand that free speech is about govt intervention or interference....
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#83
free speech law ONLY relates to the govt. I can still "regulate" you.....just like I can a smoker
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#129
and i dont....mine is based on what a court of law would do.....look for precedence
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#136
then what the hell is your problem? I don't get it.....where is the censorship?
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#152
I am saying that it is not my job to get you to accommodate my feelings in your speech.
riqster
Jun 2014
#110
there is nothing wrong with trying to get people to "self-censor" in certain situations
cali
Jun 2014
#156
So, we must not coerce someone into self-censoring the urge to yell "Fire" in a crowded theater? n/t
Gormy Cuss
Jun 2014
#109
Your OP is trying to control others. Exactly what you are saying nobody should do.
MadrasT
Jun 2014
#127
Context is important, yes. But a little discretion can also go a long way.
nomorenomore08
Jun 2014
#143
Wow. This is dumb. Self censorship is not censorship. That's just completely crazy.
Squinch
Jun 2014
#151
If that's true, then they should probably take "censorship" out of "self censorship"
Orrex
Jun 2014
#175
Does incense make you feel incensed? Do tea bags have anything to do with tea baggers or oral sex?
Squinch
Jun 2014
#182
Yeah, yeah. And "irony" doesn't mean "sort of like iron." You can do better than that.
Orrex
Jun 2014
#183
Fine, Orrex. When you don't pee in the punch bowl, its because you've been oppressed by someone
Squinch
Jun 2014
#184
And I wonder what you think you are accomplishing by insisting that they are the same thing,
Squinch
Jun 2014
#189
And thread after thread condemning someone's critique of another's speech??
Zenlitened
Jun 2014
#153
I think people should use common sense and remember they agreed to the Terms of Service and
hrmjustin
Jun 2014
#161