Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Fri Jun 20, 2014, 05:18 PM Jun 2014

Marijuana Considered for Looser Restrictions by U.S. FDA [View all]

By Anna Edney Jun 20, 2014 12:03 PM ET

U.S. regulators are studying whether restrictions on marijuana should be eased, a step toward decriminalizing the drug at the federal level.

The Food and Drug Administration is conducting an analysis at the Drug Enforcement Administration’s request on whether the U.S. should downgrade the classification of marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug, said Douglas Throckmorton, Deputy Director for Regulatory Programs at the FDA, at a congressional hearing.

Schedule 1 drugs carry the most restrictions of the five DEA classifications and are considered substances with no medical benefit that are highly addictive. Factors the FDA considers in making a recommendation include a drug’s abuse potential, its pharmacological effect and risk to public health, according to Throckmorton’s written testimony.

“This has big implications,” said Representative John Mica, a Florida Republican, who is leading the oversight hearing on pot research as part of an examination of changing societal attitudes about the drug.

The FDA reviewed marijuana’s status for the DEA in 2001 and 2006 and recommended it remain Schedule 1, Throckmorton said. The DEA has since been petitioned to change marijuana’s classification and “that has been sent to us and we’re in the process of conducting an eight-factor analysis,” Throckmorton told Mica.

more...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-06-20/drug-regulators-study-easing-u-s-marijuana-restrictions.html

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They'd have to address rescheduling. Nearly half the states allow medical use of cannabis NightWatcher Jun 2014 #1
I wonder if one of the real "factors" is how much money does law enforcement make djean111 Jun 2014 #2
They would have to contrast that against potential tax and fee revenue dixiegrrrrl Jun 2014 #7
Sure, I won't give them room to breathe on that bullmess though because it means jackapple shit. TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #18
What does this mean in yankee? Seriously curious. Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #26
Means not a seconds pause for such considerations because they are meaningless. TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #35
Perfect. Thank you. Couldn't agree more. Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #36
These guys only take the thumb out of their ass -- to change thumbs. immoderate Jun 2014 #3
and to sneak a wiff TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #19
Just the testimonials about Charlotte's web, pipoman Jun 2014 #4
agreed samsingh Jun 2014 #6
I want to see studies, mainly because I'm concerned... moriah Jun 2014 #29
It is shameful of the medical community pipoman Jun 2014 #31
an executive order should be used to decriminilize marijuana samsingh Jun 2014 #5
I don't think he could legally do that. AAO Jun 2014 #24
correct...presidents can't change laws... pipoman Jun 2014 #34
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #8
Would you care to repeat that to a dying cancer patient's face? n/t jtuck004 Jun 2014 #9
Agreed: my sister-in-law's mother (at 65) was found to have cancer. tofuandbeer Jun 2014 #17
or a child with epileptic seizures. DamnYankeeInHouston Jun 2014 #11
of the last three Presidents, one pRresident and two Nobel Peace Prize winners, Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #13
Or this disabled vet Stryst Jun 2014 #14
Who let you out of the cave? Comrade Grumpy Jun 2014 #15
you are right..... Garion_55 Jun 2014 #16
Another stereotype that doesn't stand up to any scrutiny. AAO Jun 2014 #27
Considering its placement as a schedule I drug was politically motivated etherealtruth Jun 2014 #10
Not only was it political, it was provisional RainDog Jun 2014 #32
Exactly etherealtruth Jun 2014 #39
It wasn't "cannabis" - it was "marihuana" that was the "problem" RainDog Jun 2014 #41
Politics and racism etherealtruth Jun 2014 #42
Do away with the DEA! rickyhall Jun 2014 #12
Maybe Im a cynic quakerboy Jun 2014 #20
Awesome news Utopian Leftist Jun 2014 #21
This is the first step toward removing cannabis from schedule I RainDog Jun 2014 #22
Hit the nail on the head! That is the ONLY reason they are taking another look! Dustlawyer Jun 2014 #25
Exactly - claiming that marijuana has no medicinal uses just looks stupid at this point. Raksha Jun 2014 #30
Honestly - since I started following this issue RainDog Jun 2014 #33
Yep ... pbmus Jun 2014 #37
Move faster, guys. nt Hekate Jun 2014 #23
Does anyone truly believe they will lower it any more than schedule 2? AAO Jun 2014 #28
That still would be better than where it is now. It would help people going to prison for many years mucifer Jun 2014 #40
Prohibition is a failed public policy. nt TeamPooka Jun 2014 #38
It seems more and more clear Mojo Electro Jun 2014 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Marijuana Considered for ...