Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
13. No.
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 01:38 PM
Mar 2014

Last edited Tue Mar 25, 2014, 02:14 PM - Edit history (1)

In my framework, all that matters is the exergy flow through society, not whether it's centralized.

Centralization allows political structures to accrete more easily around the concentrating nodes. However, if you step back and look at history, even in the days before fossil fuels and electricity societies exhibited increasing consumption, ecological impact and organizational hierarchy. Human activities have always clustered around local energy sources, but in the past, at lower energy levels, our actions did not have the global reach they do today. Centralization is by no means necessary for human damage to be inflicted on the biosphere. It just makes it a bit easier.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NASA Study: Civilization ...»Reply #13