Trade Expert: Why TPP — “NAFTA on Steroids” — Must Be Stopped [View all]
The post-NAFTA era has been marked by growing inequality, declining job security and new leverage for corporations to attack government regulations enacted in the public interest.
But it wasnt supposed to be that way. Back in 1986, when the leaders of the US, Canada and Mexico began talks on a regional trade deal that eight years later would culminate in the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), they sold the pact to the public as an economic win-win for all parties involved.
On signing the treaty in 1994, then-President Bill Clinton said, NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American jobs. If I didnt believe that, I wouldnt support this agreement. He promised that NAFTA would result in an export boom to Mexico, and claimed that such trade deals transcend ideology because support for them is so uniform that it unites people in both parties.
Twenty years later, we can test how those claims panned out in the real world. And Public Citizens Global Trade Watch did just that, releasing a comprehensive study of NAFTAs impacts.
(more at link)
http://billmoyers.com/2014/01/09/fool-me-once-20-years-of-nafta-show-why-the-trans-pacific-partnership-must-be-stopped/