General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bob Graham speaking out about 9/11 again. Also 2 archived articles Saudi flights after 9/11 [View all]madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Murdoch's NY Post backing up Michael Moore and Bob Graham. Odd indeed.
http://www.showbiz411.com/2013/12/15/murdochs-nypost-today-backs-michael-moore-bush-saudi-claims-from-fahrenheit-911/comment-page-1
"Moore must get a lot of satisfaction out of this. Its only taken a decade for a conservative pundit writing in a conservative newspaper to endorse his movie.
Indeed, Paul Sperrys editorial is a direct echo of a 2003 Vanity Fair story by Craig Unger, author of the book that was the underlying information for the Oscar winning movie. That book was called House of Bush, House of Saud and it still available for Kindle. The Vanity Fair article was called Saving the Saudis, publishing ten years ago. Heres the link: http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2003/10/saving-the-saudis-200310
Todays piece by Sperry is shocking first because he is a conservative. But second, Sperrys piece questions why huge portions of a Congressional report about 9/11 remain redacted blacked outin his piece called Inside the Saudi Cover Up. http://nypost.com/2013/12/15/inside-the-saudi-911-coverup/
The story could just as easily have been called Inside the Bush Cover Up. Its amazing that NY Post editor Col Allan ran it, and that Rupert Murdoch would have approved it. The Post has always mocked Michael Moore, and certainly backed George W. Bush endlessly.
...Even stranger, the NY Post via Sperry is now featuring Sen. Bob Graham, Democrat of Florida. Sperry writes: Democrat Bob Graham, the former Florida senator who chaired the Joint Inquiry, has asked the FBI for the Sarasota case files, but cant get a single, even heavily redacted, page released. He says its a coverup.