Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
44. Citations are not always required, despite your fetish for them.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:26 AM
Mar 2012
"..the white-tailed deer has reached record populations in many states and will continue to grow. Densities may exceed 40 deer per square mile in some rural areas.."
http://wildlifecontrol.info/deer/pages/deerpopulationfacts.aspx


That citation you used in post 27 is a poor basis for discussion of deer herds in Idaho since the site clearly has an east coast focus. That does not make it wrong, but limits its applicability to the western states. What is accurate in New York about white tail deer populations is not true in Idaho and Montana. That is important since predators were being culled to preserve the game animal herds, while in the east, they could use some predators, not that the populace would go along with that.

In post 32 I pointed out the dramatic differences between the western and eastern US when it comes to deer herds, due to the lack of predators in the east. I also discussed in CA due to the ban of hunting cougars, the deer herds were even smaller.

Like many others, you seem to believe that deer are as plentiful in the western US as they are in the eastern US. A clear fallacy for any number of reasons. In the eastern US, deer over population is a serious problem. There are few if any natural predators for deer in places like Maryland or Vermont. They take out cars and motorcycles with some regularity. Its different out west where there are wolves, cougars, etc that do prey on deer. Deer are not nearly the nuisance that they are back east. Finally there is California where in 1990 Prop 117 banned the hunting of cougars. The result was a population growth in the big cats, who's primary prey is deer. Eventually Malthus caught up with them too, and we had a spate of attacks on humans. Things have balanced out somewhat since then, but the California deer herds have never recovered. My comment about asking any California deer hunter was sarcastic, since most go to Utah and elsewhere to hunt...the deer are that sparse here and plentiful over there. The data that supports the above is clearly available form the California Dept of Fish and Game. The page titled "Long Term Trends in California's Deer Population" is somewhat misleading, you need to dig to find the census data deeper down.


Everything I said could indeed have citations, but they are well known and obvious to anyone with knowledge in the field. . However if you want to argue against obvious facts, we might have a flat earth group around here somewhere on DU3

In recent years, wolves have been identified... joeybee12 Feb 2012 #1
What fucking "change," Mr. Obama? villager Feb 2012 #2
He also has continued to allow the BLM's Boudica the Lyoness Mar 2012 #20
When it comes to wildlife and wilderness, in particular, this administration is as abysmal villager Mar 2012 #23
Native Americans have always eaten horses when needed ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #26
Yup. This, to me, is one of his biggest failings..and yet it gets surprisingly little play... truebrit71 Mar 2012 #38
Thank you jsmirman Feb 2012 #5
You're welcome...and you should come over to the joeybee12 Feb 2012 #6
This jsmirman Feb 2012 #7
So, you're on the DARKER Side!!! joeybee12 Feb 2012 #9
The DARKEST side jsmirman Feb 2012 #11
Yeah, all the more elk for hunters to kill. n/t RebelOne Feb 2012 #3
Bastards. Rat bastards. Does it make you feel like men? catbyte Feb 2012 #4
I don't know tyne Feb 2012 #8
I highly recommend the book, "Never Cry Wolf," by Farley Mowat. BlueIris Feb 2012 #10
Apparently many here have not heard of subsistence hunting ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #12
"Those that need to hunt to feed themselves"?..In a National Park? red dog 1 Feb 2012 #13
Neither the prey nor the predators restrict themselves to NPS boundaries ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #14
Obama could have prevented this wolf slaughter. red dog 1 Mar 2012 #15
A better question is whether or not it was appropriate ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #18
"A better reaction is whether or not it was appropriate"? red dog 1 Mar 2012 #19
What do you have against subsistence hunting? ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #22
Subsistence hunting is fine, but red dog 1 Mar 2012 #24
Elk is much better eating that deer...that does not sound like trophy hunting to me ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #25
"Elk is much better eating than deer", so you're not arguing for "subsistence hunting" anymore? red dog 1 Mar 2012 #27
Your cited source is less than accurate...just ask any deer hunter in California. ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #28
"Your cited source is less than accurate...just ask any deer hunter in California"?? red dog 1 Mar 2012 #29
Your clear lack of knowledge is showing quite clearly ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #32
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #34
Lets review the thread for what it actually posted ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #35
"You then made false statements about deer populations"........"I rebutted them"? red dog 1 Mar 2012 #39
One more thing, "Professor",... your statement in Post # 32 is inaccurate, red dog 1 Mar 2012 #42
Citations are not always required, despite your fetish for them. ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #44
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #46
All you have now are ad hominems... ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #47
"The event being discussed was in the Idaho." (sic) red dog 1 Mar 2012 #53
Yes it was ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #56
One of our Oregon wolves from NE Oregon was tracked from there into California and is now DeschutesRiver Mar 2012 #43
The policy should be to trap and relocate even if more expensive. n/t ellisonz Mar 2012 #16
This is a "No Brainer" for Obama. It keeps the hunters happy, and saves wolves lives as well/ red dog 1 Mar 2012 #31
President Obama is counting on... ellisonz Mar 2012 #33
You nailed it ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #36
So far indicators are good... ellisonz Mar 2012 #37
I have no polite words for these people Tyrs WolfDaemon Mar 2012 #17
When I first came to this country Boudica the Lyoness Mar 2012 #21
When I was a little girl... a la izquierda Mar 2012 #30
How especially asshole of them. Cleita Mar 2012 #40
Humans shoot animals so that other animals can live to be shot by humans. flvegan Mar 2012 #41
Actually humans control other predators so there will be more prey for humans to consume ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #49
So...like I said, eh? flvegan Mar 2012 #50
My point was it is not about the shooting, its about the consumption ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #51
So, like I said. Goodie. flvegan Mar 2012 #52
If you want to get REALLY disgusted about predator control, Blue_In_AK Mar 2012 #45
It started well before Palin ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #48
I would disagree with that, Blue_In_AK Mar 2012 #54
I thought you were referring to the supression of predators ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal Wildlife Agents S...»Reply #44