Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
32. Agreed. Some among us won't stand for a BlueDogDem in a Red State (the only kind that would win)
Tue Oct 1, 2013, 12:51 PM
Oct 2013

Last edited Tue Oct 1, 2013, 01:28 PM - Edit history (1)

but have unrealistic demands; thinking they can place a Liberal in a deep-red district and then win the election. I don't know what planet they're on, but they should understand that, just as a BlueDogDem can't win an election in a liberal district, a *Liberal Democrat can't win in a deep-red district. Why is that so hard for them to understand that simple fact?

They didn't lose because we hated them, so the cthulu2016 Oct 2013 #1
Some of us rejoiced in their defeat, and some of us think we should be following pnwmom Oct 2013 #7
Agreed. Some among us won't stand for a BlueDogDem in a Red State (the only kind that would win) BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #32
Me--here in PA. The only Democrats we elect here in Pennsyltucky are Blue Dogs. nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #60
You mean like Chaka Fatah? Demoiselle Oct 2013 #195
Honey...Pennsyltucky doesn't include Philly or Pittsburgh..remember what Carville said? nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #200
Pennsyltucky is not quite all of Pennsylvania. Demoiselle Oct 2013 #207
I love your Congressman. Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #201
I love him too. Good guy, classy and smart. Demoiselle Oct 2013 #206
Glad to have him. Would he be able to win outside the district that elected him? Hekate Oct 2013 #210
His district includes chunks of both the city and its Western suburbs. Demoiselle Oct 2013 #216
While wondering what planet people are on... cthulu2016 Oct 2013 #77
The lie? Jeff In Milwaukee Oct 2013 #89
Hmmmm... so you deduce "left" from ethnicity? cthulu2016 Oct 2013 #95
Black/left - same diff Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #114
Ummm.... Jeff In Milwaukee Oct 2013 #117
African American voters are undeniably far more likely to vote Democratic. pnwmom Oct 2013 #126
Was it African Americans who primaried Blue Dogs? Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #137
No. But they didn't help them stay in office. n/t pnwmom Oct 2013 #145
Doesn't matter, this is to keep the shit stirred. Rex Oct 2013 #154
Our own version? progressoid Oct 2013 #69
I love the Liberal = Bad meme LondonReign2 Oct 2013 #107
When you are weak and have no honest debate points Rex Oct 2013 #148
Why are you still telling this lie? LondonReign2 Oct 2013 #187
Harry Truman was right hootinholler Oct 2013 #37
Exactly. hobbit709 Oct 2013 #48
Nailed It! bvar22 Oct 2013 #57
+1. n/t Laelth Oct 2013 #88
Yup. Thread over. Maven Oct 2013 #82
Woohoo! brush Oct 2013 #205
Except that quote doesn't account for the fact that in modern times mythology Oct 2013 #214
Well we needed our daily liberal bashing thread Rex Oct 2013 #147
Yes it does. nt Mojorabbit Oct 2013 #162
In other words, capitulating to the right, again and again, didn't save their careers? villager Oct 2013 #2
And you don't see the treestar Oct 2013 #10
Unless you're replying to the OP... villager Oct 2013 #27
Well now we don't have to "capitulate" to the right at all treestar Oct 2013 #61
Well, they control it more. When Dems vote like Republicans, they still control it. villager Oct 2013 #65
Now you're just being stubborn treestar Oct 2013 #68
My point is, when the country moves inexorably to the right, it's still moving inexorably villager Oct 2013 #73
Moving "inexorably" to the right? From what starting point? onenote Oct 2013 #78
+1 Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2013 #118
Apparently, that poster doesn't. BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #33
Strawmen much? villager Oct 2013 #49
Tea Partier is an even MORE losing strategy treestar Oct 2013 #64
Yes, capitulating to the right hasn't saved us from... the right. villager Oct 2013 #67
How do you define "capitulating to the right"? BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #86
You've switched from apples to oranges, now villager Oct 2013 #91
^ pearls reddread Oct 2013 #189
Having Democrats who vote against Democrats 30% of the time is a BIG problem. nt laundry_queen Oct 2013 #254
But having Teapublicans vote against Democrats 98% is a much bigger problem, yes? BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #261
I don't agree with your premise. laundry_queen Oct 2013 #265
And I don't agree with your premise. BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #267
mine's already been proven laundry_queen Oct 2013 #269
So has mine. BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #270
So you think. nt laundry_queen Oct 2013 #272
Nah. It's a given fact. eom BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #273
So, you think the Democrats in Congress right now should Jamastiene Oct 2013 #220
Blue Doggery is NOT a losing strategy..... for conservatives. bvar22 Oct 2013 #136
Yes. The Rightwing ultimately wins, either way. villager Oct 2013 #140
+1 frylock Oct 2013 #11
+1 Vashta Nerada Oct 2013 #25
So true. The push to change the Dem Party into a milder version sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #38
+1 villager Oct 2013 #50
Yup. progressoid Oct 2013 #72
SHOCKER! Maven Oct 2013 #85
Except when it's the "gays" Jamastiene Oct 2013 #221
Oh, so you'd think they'd be on our side in this critical moment?? Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #3
This critical moment wouldn't be happening at all if we'd retained the majority in the House. pnwmom Oct 2013 #12
There's a reason why most 'republican-lite' -dems Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #23
Which is why we should be supporting every Dem in a tough election pnwmom Oct 2013 #29
Bingo. eom BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #34
I've voted for the blue dogs here in Va. every time... Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #41
That's great. But not everyone did what you did. pnwmom Oct 2013 #153
Oregon turnout in 2010 was record setting. No Blue Dogs to keep Democrats away. Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #208
The OP has to keep changing the theory Rex Oct 2013 #212
I've got a Blue Dog Kurt Schrader after redistricting. Went from Blumenauer's district (awesome!) to neverforget Oct 2013 #230
+10000!!!! Walk away Oct 2013 #149
Then blame the Blue Dogs who lost the critical Independent vote sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #43
When liberals lose, their politics are the problem. When Blue Dogs lose, liberals are the problem. Marr Oct 2013 #196
Yes, a lot of people are wondering, A LOT about these constant attacks on Liberals sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #198
Of course treestar Oct 2013 #14
The one-term blue dog in my district voted against it... Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #19
But because the House was under Speaker Pelosi, ObamaCare was able to proceed BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #39
It still passed THAT house treestar Oct 2013 #59
How can they help us if they "get replaced?" immoderate Oct 2013 #4
That was my point. A blue dog might not provide pnwmom Oct 2013 #79
So why don't they get elected? immoderate Oct 2013 #97
Unfortunately, a lot of Dems stayed home in 2010 pnwmom Oct 2013 #102
Are you undermining your thesis here? Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #106
Not at all. n/t pnwmom Oct 2013 #127
the liberal Dems did not stay home mitchtv Oct 2013 #125
A significant number of African American and younger voters pnwmom Oct 2013 #128
You are undermining your thesis Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #133
sounds like what I called part time voters mitchtv Oct 2013 #176
Which undermines your thesis. R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2013 #251
What happened is a DINO got replaced with a real Republican. Cleita Oct 2013 #5
+1 leftstreet Oct 2013 #9
And that meant Pelosi got replaced with Boehner. Majorities matter, pnwmom Oct 2013 #13
We'll see in the next election. I'm predicting all the Tea Party will be Cleita Oct 2013 #24
My blue dog backed Shuler. Chan790 Oct 2013 #35
she knew how to standup for us, didnt she? reddread Oct 2013 #190
You're still flailing about. R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2013 #252
Exactly! n/t sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #46
Name some far left members of Congress creeksneakers2 Oct 2013 #236
Name some candidates who ran or were on the ballot. Cleita Oct 2013 #240
Do you think no far lefties ran in any red districts? creeksneakers2 Oct 2013 #242
Yes treestar Oct 2013 #6
I remember well handmade34 Oct 2013 #8
It was a dark day, indeed. eom BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #42
That whole "stay home in 2010 to punish Obama" idiocy CakeGrrl Oct 2013 #15
I never heard of the "stay home to punish Obama plan" Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #21
Ed Schultz has propagated it on his radio show and his week-day television show. BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #47
Some people say that's not true Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #92
The problem with those stats is, for example, I consider myself a Liberal. But many here on DU BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #130
What a bunch of gobbedly gook you just threw up there Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #135
I'm sorry you choose to be so unreasonable. BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #234
I didn't make that mistake about you Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #246
Which means what I wrote in my previous post to which you responded BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #263
A train leaves Chicago traveling 48mph Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #264
If you have to revert to epithets such as "ultra-left" you really aren't that much of a liberal... R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2013 #247
I'm sorry my opinion offended you. I guess the shoe fit, eh? eom BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #262
There was no offense taken, and I hope that you are less wrong in the future. R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2013 #266
Of course there wasn't. eom BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #268
Great piece. ForgoTheConsequence Oct 2013 #163
+1000 Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #45
What is the 'stay home to punish Obama idiocy'?? sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #56
Because ideologically it's a useful weapon to use against us Hydra Oct 2013 #98
I want to know who these people are here who are constantly sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #101
It's all message control Hydra Oct 2013 #104
I'm just saying... Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #108
If Dems had not come out we would have lost the Senate and sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #111
That was a fantasy AgingAmerican Oct 2013 #70
Stop pushing that stupid falsehood. Union Scribe Oct 2013 #80
Is that what you did in your State? In Oregon in 2010 we had record breaking turnout Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #99
"Moderates" are the ones who stayed home. Look in the mirror and stop Marr Oct 2013 #197
The ones who routinely sided with the repubs Cerridwen Oct 2013 #16
FUCK NADER Capt. Obvious Oct 2013 #17
I don't know - it's like being asked if you want to be hung or hedgehog Oct 2013 #18
Maybe if we would have run a real Democrat, instead of an imitation one, we would not have lost RC Oct 2013 #20
Hear hear! PeteSelman Oct 2013 #54
It's a delusion to think we can run a "real progressive" pnwmom Oct 2013 #81
A Centralest Democrat is not a DLC'er, DINO or whatever. RC Oct 2013 #105
Well, you got YOUR way with that theory and people DID vote for Blue Dogs. Now sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #180
No, in 2010 not enough Dems went to the polls. That's why we lost. pnwmom Oct 2013 #183
That is absolutely false no matter how many times you say it. Independents sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #186
Wow. Vashta Nerada Oct 2013 #22
Screaming subtext: it's the fault of progressives that government got shut down. DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2013 #26
No it's the fault of the tea party nuts who were elected pnwmom Oct 2013 #31
The Dems showed up Hydra Oct 2013 #36
Complacent? Chan790 Oct 2013 #51
Still sticking with that lie against all evidence, huh? LondonReign2 Oct 2013 #112
+1 Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2013 #121
You've been corrected on that point about a thousand times, so I can only conclude that Marr Oct 2013 #250
The Blue Dogs have themselves to blame is they couldn't defeat "crazy." R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2013 #253
Which is akin to blaming Jane Fonda for losing in Vietnam. Orsino Oct 2013 #40
That is always the screaming subtext of the self-styled, right-leaning "pragmatists." villager Oct 2013 #52
Disgustipated for the win Myrina Oct 2013 #53
+1 progressoid Oct 2013 #76
Thank you. n/t onyourleft Oct 2013 #84
Tea partiers were elected through underhanded redistricting. Avalux Oct 2013 #28
+1. Well said. n/t FSogol Oct 2013 #30
Yep Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #44
Yep. They will. Due to the major state wins in 2010, districts have been gerrymandered BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #55
Well, they can't since Kelvin Mace Oct 2013 #179
Yes, they probably will be LondonReign2 Oct 2013 #113
Blue dogs lost because they are piss poor capitulating candidates. morningfog Oct 2013 #58
Earth to OP: Dems lost the House in large part because of disillusionment at HCR and leveymg Oct 2013 #62
So how did the 9 Blue Dogs that voted with the Republicans yesterday help us control the House? stranger81 Oct 2013 #63
Oh, that's going to leave a mark Hydra Oct 2013 #100
But, but, but we have to support them. They're Democrats...even whe they side with Republicans. R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2013 #103
Yeah, the OP's premise of "don't-you-wish-you-still-had-the-blue-dogs" Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #185
But they also put the gavel in someone else hands Egnever Oct 2013 #142
Great point. ForgoTheConsequence Oct 2013 #157
YOu won't get an answer from the OP. Rex Oct 2013 #159
Because they didn't vote for Boehner for speaker Recursion Oct 2013 #248
The blue dogs got themselves voted out AgingAmerican Oct 2013 #66
How many blue dog incumbents lost to tea party people? NCTraveler Oct 2013 #71
Stats!? In a flamebait OP!? villager Oct 2013 #74
My blue dog just voted WITH the repubs n2doc Oct 2013 #75
^ THIS! Union Scribe Oct 2013 #83
So how was it the great outpouring of progressives in your district didn't rise up and primary him onenote Oct 2013 #87
Because our great and wise state Democratic party doesn't give a crap about anyone outside ATL n2doc Oct 2013 #90
And that's the way it is almost every place. Greedy, conservative cliques that guard the gates. Egalitarian Thug Oct 2013 #167
+1 They need to take responsibility for what they claim happened. treestar Oct 2013 #255
Of course I'm glad we purged most of the fakes out B Calm Oct 2013 #93
Did your Blue dog vote for Pelosi for speaker or Boehner? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2013 #123
A Conservative is still a Conservative. Hayabusa Oct 2013 #94
Wrong. Those Blue Dogs were replaced because they acted like Republicans. R. Daneel Olivaw Oct 2013 #96
So the shutdown is the fault of people who hated blue dogs? SomethingFishy Oct 2013 #109
No. Those who voted against them bear most of the blame. BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #116
Yeah well there was an election in 2012 too.. this OP is just one more today SomethingFishy Oct 2013 #119
I'm not bashing Democrats, f*cking or otherwise. BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #124
Whatever. SomethingFishy Oct 2013 #131
I'm sorry you see it that way. BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #134
Of course you are right, the very people in this thread Rex Oct 2013 #141
You don't get it. ForgoTheConsequence Oct 2013 #150
Blue Dogs? Try Tea Dogs. 9 of them vote with the Republicans yesterday did they not? Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #110
I thought my rep was Dem Raul Ruiz mitchtv Oct 2013 #143
You know why. ForgoTheConsequence Oct 2013 #146
You miss the point Egnever Oct 2013 #155
Many Blue Dogs voted against her as Speaker previously, so too many of them and you get Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #199
what a bunch of crap Egnever Oct 2013 #244
The Speaker comes from the majority Party sure but that does not mean every member of Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #277
LOL more crap Egnever Oct 2013 #278
Thank you Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2013 #115
The remaining Blue Dog from my state voted with the Republicans. mmonk Oct 2013 #120
Good point. I guess ecstatic Oct 2013 #129
Because he also would have voted for pelosi to be speaker Egnever Oct 2013 #158
You don't know that. ForgoTheConsequence Oct 2013 #161
This will fall on deaf ears ecstatic Oct 2013 #122
If you want a republican, vote for the real thing. B Calm Oct 2013 #139
If you dont want republican legislation Egnever Oct 2013 #160
Whoosh B Calm Oct 2013 #192
I remember several saying they'd rather see a Repub win then Stupak re-elected Kaleva Oct 2013 #132
I can spin a story out of whole cloth too, nice try but fail. Rex Oct 2013 #138
It's always the liberals fault isn't it? ForgoTheConsequence Oct 2013 #144
Foxnews blames the Democratic Party. Rex Oct 2013 #151
Word. This country is turning into a clown show. nt adirondacker Oct 2013 #164
And Congess hosts the biggest number of clowns. Rex Oct 2013 #165
Fox News NEVER blames the Democratic Party. They blame the Democrat Party. :) valerief Oct 2013 #239
Just like Florida 2000. Moses2SandyKoufax Oct 2013 #191
It's always either the liberals' fault, the gays' fault, Jamastiene Oct 2013 #217
Thank You! Tarheel_Dem Oct 2013 #152
Blud dog Democrats gave the majoirty to Democrats so Democrats could set the agenda. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2013 #156
Maybe, if they tried appealing to the left instead of the right, they'd have been elected. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2013 #166
A blue dog Dem wouldn't get elected in a conservative red community pnwmom Oct 2013 #169
Oh, well. If appealing to the left or right doesn't work, what does? Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2013 #172
Appealing to centrists or moderates can work in a conservative district. pnwmom Oct 2013 #173
Apparently, that didn't work either. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2013 #178
I think a better solution is for the party to offer even more financial pnwmom Oct 2013 #181
And there you have it. A Blue Dog Democrat who votes with MineralMan Oct 2013 #168
A SHIT LOAD of "blue dogs" voted AGAINST the ACA in the first place! bullwinkle428 Oct 2013 #170
That wouldn't matter a bit now. Nancy Pelosi would be in charge, pnwmom Oct 2013 #171
Still sticking with the lie the liberals didn't come out to vote in 2010? LondonReign2 Oct 2013 #175
Not only that, but they took universal healthcare off the table as well. If they had been real Zorra Oct 2013 #182
Most of them Pab Sungenis Oct 2013 #174
All I know is that some here hate the Left with the exact same passion Rex Oct 2013 #177
Fuck the blue dogs... polichick Oct 2013 #184
Enough already... Blue Idaho Oct 2013 #188
+1 B Calm Oct 2013 #193
As if they wouldn't line up with the Republicans. Marr Oct 2013 #194
Reminds me of this-- Jackpine Radical Oct 2013 #202
They were DINOs . . . brush Oct 2013 #203
Incumbent republicans also lost seats to tea party crazies. The biggest problem facing us is lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #204
You know I'm with you all the way on that, pnwmom Hekate Oct 2013 #209
I still hate them. hobbit709 Oct 2013 #211
They would vote with the Republicans most of the time, including now. Jamastiene Oct 2013 #213
This post is dominated by individuals spouting a convenient meme. OilemFirchen Oct 2013 #215
And liberal Dennis Kucinich lost in Ohio then, too, right? pnwmom Oct 2013 #219
Clearly, if Kucinich had listed more to the left OilemFirchen Oct 2013 #222
When a Republican runs against a Republican, the Republican wins every time Taverner Oct 2013 #218
Read it the first seventeen times. OilemFirchen Oct 2013 #224
Meh, maybe it was 18 times because it is, you know, correct? Taverner Oct 2013 #226
So Ted Strickland lost to John Kasich OilemFirchen Oct 2013 #228
I never really thought Strickland was really blue dog Taverner Oct 2013 #229
Pretty sure that was my point. OilemFirchen Oct 2013 #231
No I am just happy the blue dogs went away Taverner Oct 2013 #243
You said "Blue Dog dem helping us." Maedhros Oct 2013 #223
^^This^^ Vashta Nerada Oct 2013 #232
it's way better, thank you stillcool Oct 2013 #225
Its way better having a GOP House Daniel537 Oct 2013 #279
Still hatein' the SOBs Va Lefty Oct 2013 #227
Actually... Vashta Nerada Oct 2013 #233
That's pretty good Va Lefty Oct 2013 #241
Comedy MFrohike Oct 2013 #235
Our country is healthier with more Democrats of any type in office IronLionZion Oct 2013 #237
Blue dog Dem = DINO. What good are they? nt valerief Oct 2013 #238
Well, again, as the OP points out, they don't vote for John Boehner to be speaker Recursion Oct 2013 #249
In the last weeks, several 'Blue Dogs' or conservative Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #274
I didn't say "with the caucus" I said "for the caucus" Recursion Oct 2013 #275
Well, we vote for Democrats to begin with OmahaBlueDog Oct 2013 #256
DU rec...nt SidDithers Oct 2013 #245
Boy do I miss Joe Lieberman and all of his supporters both here on DU, and abroad. adirondacker Oct 2013 #257
The Joe Lieberman Wing of the Democratic Party is alive and well here on DU, bvar22 Oct 2013 #258
You'd think they would embed a picture for identification purposes... adirondacker Oct 2013 #260
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #259
Those guys were annoying, but at least they didn't threaten to burn the government down if they Arkana Oct 2013 #271
Are you kidding me. They would have thrown in with the teahadists 10 times by now. lonestarnot Oct 2013 #276
Oh really? So they would have voted John Boehner for Speaker? Daniel537 Oct 2013 #280
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You know those Blue Dog d...»Reply #32