Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

OKDem08

(1,340 posts)
Thu Sep 26, 2013, 12:27 AM Sep 2013

Jeremy Scahill's take on Obama's UN Speech [View all]


PRESIDENT OBAMA: The United States of America is prepared to use all elements of our power, including military force, to secure our core interests in the region. We will confront external aggression our allies and partners, as we did in the Gulf War. We will ensure the free flow of energy from the region to the world.



JEREMY SCAHILL: During this section of the speech my jaw sort of hit the floor. He basically came out and said the United States is an imperialist nation and we are going to do whatever we need to conquer areas to take resources from around the world. I mean, it was a really naked sort of declaration of imperialism, and I don’t use that word lightly, but it really is. I mean, he pushed back against the Russians when he came out and said I believe America is an exceptional nation. He then defended the Gulf War and basically said that the motivation behind it was about oil and said we are going to continue to take such actions in pursuit of securing natural resources for ourselves and our allies. I mean, this was a pretty incredible and bold declaration he was making, especially given the way that he has tried to portray himself around the world. On the other hand, you know, remember what happened right before Obama took the stage is that the president of Brazil got up, and she herself is a former political prisoner who was abused and targeted in a different lifetime, and she gets up and just blasts the United States over the NSA spy program around the world.
72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
k&r thanks for posting. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #1
It's a good thing ProSense Sep 2013 #2
Honesty is refreshing. JDPriestly Sep 2013 #22
Yes it is. nt Mojorabbit Sep 2013 #71
+1 JoePhilly Sep 2013 #43
I saw that on Democracy Now! Cleita Sep 2013 #3
But isn't that what we voted to change? dkf Sep 2013 #4
We did and we didn't get change in foreign policy. Cleita Sep 2013 #37
I credit Obama for stating the obvious.. 2banon Sep 2013 #57
True, I had hoped when I voted for him he would have been a better man than his predecessors, but Dragonfli Sep 2013 #5
So effectively there has been no change. avaistheone1 Sep 2013 #23
Not in the national leadership's continuing belief we have a right to the resources we covet Dragonfli Sep 2013 #25
Well said, thanks. Nt newfie11 Sep 2013 #27
I thought we elected Dems to change that. The rest of the world will never take kindly to the US sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #35
We, the people, are going to have to force them to change the policy. Cleita Sep 2013 #39
Yes, but people ARE beginning to wake up, slowly but surely. As Brzenzski said recently, ruefully sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #61
Obama's statements were grotesque. Luminous Animal Sep 2013 #6
Scahill's opinions are from a parallel universe. ProSense Sep 2013 #7
Democracy Now or PROSENSE? hmmm.... bobduca Sep 2013 #18
What do you think "we will ensure the free flow of energy from the region" means? muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #29
But he said some nice things to Iran!!! bobduca Sep 2013 #36
I believe he's saying the oil justifies "defense" not "intervention." Uncle Joe Sep 2013 #42
Iran's mullahs are less hostile to the US government geek tragedy Sep 2013 #31
Don't you mean the alternative universe G_j Sep 2013 #64
I think he was stating the obvious. joshcryer Sep 2013 #17
Scahill's a noisy a-hole. Here's a transcript of the President's speech: struggle4progress Sep 2013 #8
Here's the text, vid, and pics.. Cha Sep 2013 #11
Text is a Transcript of the conversation. n/t 2banon Sep 2013 #15
Did you think Scahill was an "a-hole" with his BlackWater expose? 2banon Sep 2013 #13
Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #19
Larry Johnson criticized Bush, and then went on to push the "whitey tape" ProSense Sep 2013 #20
No one is calling Obama a neo-con 99th_Monkey Sep 2013 #24
"Jeremy Scahill Lambasts ‘Imperialist’ Obama’s ‘Neocon’ Foreign Policy " ProSense Sep 2013 #33
Actually, it isn't a bullshit take on part of the speech. 2banon Sep 2013 #34
The POLICY is "neocon", not Obama nt 99th_Monkey Sep 2013 #40
(1) Blackwater was on our radar here at DU long before Scahill wrote his book; check struggle4progress Sep 2013 #44
It's true Jeremy took a few years to publish his book 2banon Sep 2013 #52
Um, no, he wasn't the only one covering the topic struggle4progress Sep 2013 #62
Winning Govt Contracts ? 2banon Sep 2013 #65
If you really want to win these fights, and not just make noises, you might pay attention struggle4progress Sep 2013 #67
I've been following the money for longer than I can remember.. 2banon Sep 2013 #68
Really? Upthread you ridiculously accused me: "Bomb Bomb Iran jingle made you giggle" struggle4progress Sep 2013 #70
i wasn't asking you to apologize to me. 2banon Sep 2013 #72
(2) The current pseudo-leftist fad, of noisy outrage without careful analysis and without struggle4progress Sep 2013 #46
Pseudo Left? LOL! Chic?? huh?? 2banon Sep 2013 #54
(3) President Obama's speech contains nothing resembling Scahill's description of it struggle4progress Sep 2013 #47
Thanks for confirming the noisy asshole's point. GeorgeGist Sep 2013 #30
I guess the yattering bourgeoise pseudo-radical have something of a following. I might struggle4progress Sep 2013 #48
You're clearly not familiar with either Scahill nor his circle of friends. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #49
Educate me: what has Scahill done regarding wages? struggle4progress Sep 2013 #50
You do understand the concept of a beat reporter, right? NuclearDem Sep 2013 #51
Well there you go Doctor_J Sep 2013 #58
me, bourgoise??? LOL!!! 2banon Sep 2013 #55
I was referring to Scahill. I apologize for being unclear struggle4progress Sep 2013 #63
accepted.. 2banon Sep 2013 #66
This message was self-deleted by its author struggle4progress Sep 2013 #45
{clears throat} Eqccuuummmmmm....... DeSwiss Sep 2013 #9
+++++++++++++++ n/t 2banon Sep 2013 #10
Yep newfie11 Sep 2013 #28
Why isn't Scahill posting the Text around that statement? Haven't read everything but why do I get.. uponit7771 Sep 2013 #12
Those remarks weren't written, it was a conversation. 2banon Sep 2013 #14
Because it never is. He always does this. He selects a quote, takes it out of context, Liberal_Stalwart71 Sep 2013 #38
You could have paid attention to reply #14. It's correct. Then you wouldn't be wrong. muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #41
Thank you for the work you had to put into this in order to CLARIFY the FACTS. 2banon Sep 2013 #56
Still not sure where you see imperialism, preemptive attack, nation-building, or any of the tenets Liberal_Stalwart71 Sep 2013 #60
Foolish Citizen.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #16
I see the knee-jerk element is out in full force davidpdx Sep 2013 #21
K&R idwiyo Sep 2013 #26
"Democracy" now reddread Sep 2013 #32
Kicked Humble companion Sep 2013 #53
Under the bus with him! how dare he use the president's quotes against the president! Doctor_J Sep 2013 #59
This post should have included Link to the Video.. 2banon Sep 2013 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jeremy Scahill's take on ...