Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

calimary

(81,304 posts)
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 11:04 PM Feb 2012

For your consideration: a nationwide women's action: "Not Tonight, Dear." [View all]

I am just SERIOUSLY getting pissed off about this forced ultrasound, vaginal probe business. HOW DARE THEY!!?!?!?!?? Aren't these the same people running around all over the place bellowing about the "URGENT" need to "shrink the government down small enough that you can drown it in a bathtub?" How small a government did they have in mind? Penis-size, maybe? Makes me wonder if women should respond with a nationwide, ONGOING "Not Tonight, Dear" campaign. Ongoing until this crap STOPS. You're not gettin' any UNTIL THIS CRAP STOPS.

I'm totally serious. I think we ought to start talking about something like this, and agitating about something like this, or at least make 'em think we are. These proposals and outrages and vile intrusions are bills overwhelmingly introduced, sponsored, and furthered, by men. The male chair (darrell issa) of that stupid committee they said was about some smarmy religious touchy-feely was about NOTHING ELSE than access to contraception and the rationalization of restricting and withholding it. That's ALL it was ever about!!! And NO women were invited onto the panel. Deliberately. That was no sloppy mistake on the part of some aide.

I think we should harness the mushrooming anger and outrage that is coming from women everywhere, from coast-to-coast. Give it a voice and give it a concrete action it can take - that makes it physical, personal, and as direct as all hell. And yes. Take the fight to the enemy by hitting squarely below the belt. Eye-to-eye, chest-to-chest, body-to-body.

That is, of course, unless the woman's lover, partner or spouse is progressive in his/her thinking and supportive of a woman's right not merely to choose, but the right to have physical dignity, the right to privacy especially as it affects the MOST INTIMATE AND HIGHLY-PERSONAL area of her body forcryingoutloud!!!! I'm glad I have a husband who can be completely exempted from this punitive "okay, pal, if this is how you wanna play..." protest. And I feel very fortunate. He's as much of an ardent feminist as I am. And like me, he too has a daughter of child-bearing age. He doesn't want Big Brother Government intruding into her private decisions anymore than he ever wanted that for me.

Should also be buttressed in other ways, such as the few-but-increasing cases of bills being introduced that would place Viagra under the same insurance access restrictions, and one attempt I heard about, I think in Virginia, that called for any man wanting insurance coverage for Viagra prescriptions would have to submit to various forms of genital exams. I think we have to start hitting them where it hurts. The figurative, political-metaphor version of "kick 'em in the nuts" that's routinely taught in women's self-defense classes. It's long past time to STRIKE BACK.

Women all over America should start forcing that damn door to swing both ways!!!! And yeah, we have to force it. No more nice.

I'd love your thoughts.

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I wonder if anyone has proposed this to Occupy, MoveOn, NARAL, PP ProfessionalLeftist Feb 2012 #1
Oh, we're all about taking action over on FB. kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #2
There's also this: calimary Feb 2012 #5
Ohh. Thanks! n/t ProfessionalLeftist Mar 2012 #14
Don't know. But I'm just fed up with this! I wanna force some damn CONSEQUENCES calimary Feb 2012 #4
Yup, men required to have a penis probe before getting an RX for viagra. Got to find crunch60 Feb 2012 #8
I think some of our reps in DC should start another line of attack as well: calimary Mar 2012 #34
I feel the same way. Ship of Fools Mar 2012 #26
"Lysistrata" TreasonousBastard Feb 2012 #3
And after the legislators Ilsa Feb 2012 #6
My wonderful husband AnnieBW Mar 2012 #10
My thoughts exactly <eom> catrose Mar 2012 #12
That was my first thought, too. hifiguy Mar 2012 #25
That has been the answer all along. See who comes to their milk then! lonestarnot Feb 2012 #7
That bill got me incensed, too. It is unbelievable to have this going on in the 21st century! Honeycombe8 Feb 2012 #9
But wouldn't the woman be punishing herself as well as her partner? Nye Bevan Mar 2012 #11
are you voting in favour of any of these woman-hating bills? if not, you should be okay niyad Mar 2012 #13
Yes. The whole idea partakes of the same sexism treestar Mar 2012 #17
Well, women are being attacked directly in their genitals with the trans-vaginal probe lunatica Mar 2012 #19
There must be some other way - letter writing, marches, protests treestar Mar 2012 #22
You can't be more mistaken lunatica Mar 2012 #29
But that's exactly the problem with it. Withywindle Mar 2012 #31
Certainly not! Our husbands, partners, lovers who support us in this - are all exempt. calimary Mar 2012 #32
That still wouldn't remove the option of renting or toe tapping in public restrooms Major Nikon Mar 2012 #15
I'm beginning to see red, too. Ship of Fools Mar 2012 #16
Don't you think those same people already see us as manipulative? lunatica Mar 2012 #20
Oh, absoLUTEly they do. No question!!!! Ship of Fools Mar 2012 #24
I hope that's one of the many ways we should do it lunatica Mar 2012 #30
I think these bills are about as overreaching as you can get without actually being in the bedroom. HughBeaumont Mar 2012 #18
Is this protest needed against you? lunatica Mar 2012 #21
Cut. Them. Off. Bake Mar 2012 #23
Why should my wife have an excuse? DiverDave Mar 2012 #27
This makes no sense to me. HappyMe Mar 2012 #28
That's okay. It's a suggestion. And from your post I'm guessing your sweetie is an enlightened one. calimary Mar 2012 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For your consideration: a...