General Discussion

uponit7771

(90,378 posts)

9. "after it accidentally used a picture"

Reply to Catherina (Original post)

Sun Sep 1, 2013, 08:45 PM

Sep 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BBC News uses 'Iraq photo to illustrate Syrian massacre' [View all] Catherina Sep 2013 OP

this is how the pro-war profits media supports the pro-war narrative... mike_c Sep 2013 #1

That's the game. Pump up the outrage level and then retract when caught Catherina Sep 2013 #2

True. But I'm not sure 10 years is enough time. People still remember... reformist2 Sep 2013 #21

+1 Segami Sep 2013 #40

But, but but, RT is propaganda nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #3

And the BBC is a reliable 'News Source' that is not a 'mouth piece of the government' sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #15

Well personally after hearing about the downtown mafia nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #22

Well being that we are all adults I think we can discern when there is a bias in the news sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #28

Well, I know that there is enough for a book nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #31

I recall a number of such 'mistakes' cprise Sep 2013 #4

Your posting a link to "imediaethics" is unbelievably rich in irony. KittyWampus Sep 2013 #5

What's ironic is that they can't tell one of their massacres from the other anymore. sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #16

All those bodies, dead because of a bunch of a lying war criminals malaise Sep 2013 #38

did the same when the Wurlitzer faked a story about "Sandinista massacre of Miskitos" like '83 MisterP Sep 2013 #6

BBC is not what she once was - lots of government hacks have taken malaise Sep 2013 #7

BBC has been extremely right wing for awhile BlueStreak Sep 2013 #32

The Guardian is my trusted source malaise Sep 2013 #37

I only read if if it shows up on my doorstep, otherwise I stick to RT & the Guardian as main sources Catherina Sep 2013 #34

Conservatives are using that top photo of the shrouded Roselma Sep 2013 #8

Better trust a pastor! xfundy Sep 2013 #11

Of course there are many orgs and individuals skeptical of truedelphi Sep 2013 #13

"after it accidentally used a picture" uponit7771 Sep 2013 #9

I missed the top photo the first time around. It's excellent. Brickbat Sep 2013 #10

PRAPAGANDA!!!11!!eleventy! Heddi Sep 2013 #12

I know. I was told the other night in that the BBC is a reliable news source and I pointed sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #18

bbbbut but but but Heddi Sep 2013 #23

Well, I won't be looking for news in LBN anymore, that's for sure. It has lost all sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #25

I only get Over the Air TV (no cable) Heddi Sep 2013 #26

Yes, we just got another excellent news source, CCTV. Lol, I am sure it too will be sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #30

I've wondered if anyone has checked out the "You Tube Videos" KoKo Sep 2013 #14

I was shocked when Cameron pointed to 'videos we have seen' also. I've seen videos sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #20

Yeah I have videos of the rebels reading some declaration to blindfolded kids on their knees Catherina Sep 2013 #36

What if we find out lies were told. It will not be good for Obama or Dems.. KoKo Sep 2013 #39

Truth Commission malletgirl02 Sep 2013 #41

Kinda like when FOX "News" showed pictures from 92 of Iraq WMDs. The ones that were GONE. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #17

The neocons are getting lazy, sloppy. reformist2 Sep 2013 #19

Lots of 'accidental' and 'unintended' errors these days, aren't there suffragette Sep 2013 #24

So much for BBC (BBS) articles appearing in LBN. Unreliable source! Coyotl Sep 2013 #27

The BBC has been an unreliable source since the Bush supporting Blair government sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #42

The BBC has been caught doing this sort of thing... Mr_Jefferson_24 Sep 2013 #29

I used to have a folder of their trangressions on my old computer Catherina Sep 2013 #33

that's fucked up gopiscrap Sep 2013 #35