Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cliff Arnebeck

(305 posts)
26. They are dead serious and want total information awareness as a means of achieving total control
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 04:29 PM
Jun 2013

These are my views. I would carefully consider Jill Simpson's take on these matters to whatever extent her research, experience and judgment would differ from mine.

After the 1988 Iowa Republican primary in which GHW Bush came in third behind Bob Dole and Pat Robertson, Rove brought technology and Evangelicals to his candidate's side as no mainstream major party candidate had ever done before. The hacking of election technology--including electronic voting machines, began in earnest in the U.S. in 1988. Some of this technology had been developed and used covertly overseas before that time.

After the 2000 New Hampshire Republican primary in which GW Bush came in way behind John McCain, Rove brought big business to his candidate's side as no mainstream major party had done since Mark Hanna got McKinley elected President. Surveillance/total awareness technology is an instrument of control and the enabling of business to get everything they want, which was the commitment Karl Rove made to Tom Donohue, then President of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Much of this work, when done on behalf of the government, is contracted out as another set of profit centers for the practitioners. That also makes such work available to private corporations to be used to exploit customers and competitors alike.

I think their "end game" is total control by a corporate elite. Covert election manipulation, surveillance and the fusion of information from all sources, and covert strategic political and business assassinations as well as broad scale population control through war, insurrection, poverty, toxic food and water would be the methods of achieving control. At some point, their end game would envision the replacement of the pretense of democracy with appointment of all political leaders by their corporate superiors and the world being run like a corporation. “JFK and the Unspeakable,” by James Douglass and “The New Jim Crow,” by Michelle Alexander provide excellent documentation and argument in support of this characterization of those who did not then, and do not now, share the vision of ending war and poverty that was shared by JFK, MLK, and RFK, for which they were unceremoniously assassinated.



Link Blocked cantbeserious Jun 2013 #1
Works for me n/t Junkdrawer Jun 2013 #2
Flagged As Pornography On My Tablet cantbeserious Jun 2013 #3
I got through. lpbk2713 Jun 2013 #4
Possible interference with the story getting out Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #9
I tried looking up 'freepress.org' on Google muriel_volestrangler Jun 2013 #24
Here's a direct link to March's video starroute Jun 2013 #20
Thanks for posting this & see more of Simpson's work @ ElectionProtectionAction.org Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #23
Hi Cliff. Related Question: The amended FISA Act contains penalties for using NSA data.... Junkdrawer Jun 2013 #5
White hats and black hats Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #7
Thanks. I believe that answers my question. Just to be sure... Junkdrawer Jun 2013 #10
Direct link to the .pdf here PoliticAverse Jun 2013 #6
No, they really can't Recursion Jun 2013 #8
Endgame's President, as a youth, hacked into the Pentagon's computers Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #11
That was back when wardialers still connected directly to servers Recursion Jun 2013 #12
Endgame advises and the market pays handsomely for their advice Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #15
Arthur Anderson was quite prosperous because of their advice too Recursion Jun 2013 #16
Agreement Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #17
More seriously, as a computer security guy, I can think of a dozen companies like this Recursion Jun 2013 #18
I could totally envision some goobers with defense money to burn Romulus Quirinus Jun 2013 #19
You cannot hack a computer with no open ports, if it is not listening, or connected. bemildred Jun 2013 #13
Back doors built in to digital devices to permit surveillance and manipulation Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #30
Back doors REQUIRE open ports. nt bemildred Jun 2013 #32
Thank you, Cliff Arnebeck! Octafish Jun 2013 #14
Thanks to you, Octafish! Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #27
There seem to be some strange and powerful connections there starroute Jun 2013 #21
Yes, it's the intellectual Mecca for computer and election hacking Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #22
Is the election fraud stuff converging with the surveillance stuff? starroute Jun 2013 #25
They are dead serious and want total information awareness as a means of achieving total control Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #26
I believe the US Attorney scandal was about election manipulation. OnyxCollie Jun 2013 #31
Thanks, Cliff. elleng Jun 2013 #28
I have posted a diary @ Daily Kos of Jill's call for appointment by POTUS of Special Prosecutor Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How global corporations c...»Reply #26