Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

starroute

(12,977 posts)
25. Is the election fraud stuff converging with the surveillance stuff?
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:14 PM
Jun 2013

You're a long-time election integrity guy. Jill Simpson's name is most familiar from her allegations of election theft -- and SmarTech is part of that pattern as well. But this Endgame stuff seems more related to surveillance, the NSA, and the CIA. Do you see it as having implications for elections, as well, or are the connections on a deeper level?

The further I read in this pdf about Endgame, the more thoroughly spooked-up it seems. In-Q-Tel has been described as funding "startup companies whose technologies the CIA might someday want to buy." Or as it says on an old (and no longer available) In-Q-Tel "About" page, "Chartered in 1999 as a private, independent, nonprofit corporation, In-Q-Tel is an evolving blend of corporate strategic venture capital, business, nonprofit and government R&D models. To achieve its mission of identifying and delivering new technologies to the CIA and Intelligence Community (IC), In-Q-Tel borrows key elements from each model that enable it to link the IC to innovation in the commercial market, and back again."

Or this, from a 2005 Washington Post article (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/14/AR2005081401108.html): "In the five years since it began active operations as the "venture capital arm" of the CIA, In-Q-Tel's reach and activities have become vast for so small an operation. It has invested in more than 75 companies and delivered more than 100 technologies to the CIA, most of which otherwise would never have been considered by the intelligence agency. Virtually any U.S. entrepreneur, inventor or research scientist working on ways to analyze data has probably received a phone call from In-Q-Tel or at least been Googled by its staff of technology-watchers."

And Ken Minihan, who's on the Endgame board, succeeded Mike McConnell as NSA director in the middle 90's, at exactly the point when the NSA was first getting into domestic telecom and internet surveillance. He later became partners with former CIA director James Woolsey in Paladin Capital Group -- a private equity investment firm which formed the Paladin Capital Homeland Security Fund.three months after 9/11 to invest in homeland security firms.

So Endgame may or may not be exactly what it claims to be -- but it's certainly no fly-by-night boondoggle. It sounds dead serious. Is the real "endgame" to know everything about everybody and have complete access to it at all times?

Link Blocked cantbeserious Jun 2013 #1
Works for me n/t Junkdrawer Jun 2013 #2
Flagged As Pornography On My Tablet cantbeserious Jun 2013 #3
I got through. lpbk2713 Jun 2013 #4
Possible interference with the story getting out Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #9
I tried looking up 'freepress.org' on Google muriel_volestrangler Jun 2013 #24
Here's a direct link to March's video starroute Jun 2013 #20
Thanks for posting this & see more of Simpson's work @ ElectionProtectionAction.org Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #23
Hi Cliff. Related Question: The amended FISA Act contains penalties for using NSA data.... Junkdrawer Jun 2013 #5
White hats and black hats Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #7
Thanks. I believe that answers my question. Just to be sure... Junkdrawer Jun 2013 #10
Direct link to the .pdf here PoliticAverse Jun 2013 #6
No, they really can't Recursion Jun 2013 #8
Endgame's President, as a youth, hacked into the Pentagon's computers Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #11
That was back when wardialers still connected directly to servers Recursion Jun 2013 #12
Endgame advises and the market pays handsomely for their advice Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #15
Arthur Anderson was quite prosperous because of their advice too Recursion Jun 2013 #16
Agreement Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #17
More seriously, as a computer security guy, I can think of a dozen companies like this Recursion Jun 2013 #18
I could totally envision some goobers with defense money to burn Romulus Quirinus Jun 2013 #19
You cannot hack a computer with no open ports, if it is not listening, or connected. bemildred Jun 2013 #13
Back doors built in to digital devices to permit surveillance and manipulation Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #30
Back doors REQUIRE open ports. nt bemildred Jun 2013 #32
Thank you, Cliff Arnebeck! Octafish Jun 2013 #14
Thanks to you, Octafish! Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #27
There seem to be some strange and powerful connections there starroute Jun 2013 #21
Yes, it's the intellectual Mecca for computer and election hacking Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #22
Is the election fraud stuff converging with the surveillance stuff? starroute Jun 2013 #25
They are dead serious and want total information awareness as a means of achieving total control Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #26
I believe the US Attorney scandal was about election manipulation. OnyxCollie Jun 2013 #31
Thanks, Cliff. elleng Jun 2013 #28
I have posted a diary @ Daily Kos of Jill's call for appointment by POTUS of Special Prosecutor Cliff Arnebeck Jun 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How global corporations c...»Reply #25