Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sat Apr 27, 2013, 06:15 AM Apr 2013

Syria's chemical weapons red line has troubling consequences – for Obama [View all]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/apr/26/syria-chemical-weapons-red-line-obama


A White House letter to Senator John McCain said: 'intelligence assessments alone are not sufficient.' Photograph: Larry Downing/Reuters

Barack Obama is in a bind. On 21 March, he set out a "red line" for Syria over the use of chemical weapons:

"We will not tolerate the use of chemical weapons against the Syrian people, or the transfer of those weapons to terrorists."

Failure to heed the warning would result in "consequences".

But the Obama administration is rightly reluctant to be drawn in to the Middle East. So, even after announcing on Thursday that it is likely that chemical weapons had been used, the White House has begun to backtrack.

Desperate to avoid following through on its warning of "consequences", the White House has thrown up lots of seemingly reasonable excuses: there is no certainty yet that chemical weapons have been used; the US cannot intervene on the basis of intelligence alone; and in any case, it may only have been a small amount
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Syria's chemical weapons ...