Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
40. Wow. Did you read my entire post? Because I don't think you did.
Sat Apr 27, 2013, 02:37 AM
Apr 2013

If you did, you surely didn't address it:

I support the banning of "private transfers commercial or otherwise" and would subject each and EVERY transfer of a gun to a background check. I support size limitations on magazines. I support a law requiring the safe storage of guns AND ammo, including biometric locks. I support subjecting anyone who violates the private sale ban to the same punishment a criminal faces if their gun winds up in criminal hands and criminal acts are committed with it. I support including stolen weapons that are not reported in the previous sentence.

Are those tighter controls not even on your radar? Do you want more? Those are my starting points; not necessarily as far as I'm willing to go.

And you know what? I don't really care what you think about my "bona fides". I've been here a minute. My transparency page shows no hidden posts. Fuck the 40 people who ignore me and fear I might send them emails. I've not sent 20 emails in my eight years here, and I have ZERO people on ignore. So you can pretty much call me what you want, or question my motivations. I don't care. I've been called and accused of worse than you did in your post. Hell... there's a Democrat from Cali who posted that in being the first to step up and call the 2012 election for Barack Obama I was merely covering my ass.

So go ahead and dream of seeing gun owners like me jumping up and down on the dock screaming for you to come back and pick us up. Go ahead and ignore our statements about where in the middle we're willing to meet you. Talk right past us as if we haven't said a word... End EVERY post with the statement that gun owners practice racism, sexism, homophobia, and hate as one of your friends does in their sig line. In the short term, I don't think that works out in ANYONE'S favor.

'Folks' aren't, elleng Apr 2013 #1
LOL .. Cue in the classic DU Gungeonite Bombasters Trajan Apr 2013 #2
You've no idea who at DU owns a gun and who doesn't. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2013 #25
OK ... so you are a bona fide Liberal ? Trajan Apr 2013 #36
Wow. Did you read my entire post? Because I don't think you did. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2013 #40
I resent that BethanyQuartz Apr 2013 #31
Blah blah blah .... Trajan Apr 2013 #35
Does plastering the photos of dead servicemen stop war in the world newmember Apr 2013 #3
Actually yes, see Vietnam war. nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #5
It wasn't the photos that made the difference newmember Apr 2013 #10
Why did the pentagon have a no photos allowed then? nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #12
I agree that it was the first war in everyones living room newmember Apr 2013 #15
Check what happened to Occupy nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #18
I was going to mention the occupy movement newmember Apr 2013 #19
What you need is a national strike nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #21
I agree and would love to see that...boy would I newmember Apr 2013 #23
They don't happen often and thankfully I can sleep it off nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #26
yes. eventually is does. spanone Apr 2013 #46
The problem with background checks isn't a lack of people who want them Recursion Apr 2013 #4
Ummm...who says they are? The Straight Story Apr 2013 #6
My husband & I own guns, we also support background checks peacebird Apr 2013 #7
At the state level, sure The Straight Story Apr 2013 #8
We live in Virgina and our state does not have the best background checks... peacebird Apr 2013 #9
Well, here is an idea The Straight Story Apr 2013 #13
Alas this is the problem nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #11
No need to go to AZ The Straight Story Apr 2013 #16
They still go to AZ and California does pursue straws. nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #17
Great post. I totally agree. (n/t) spin Apr 2013 #37
90% of Americans supported background checks - that includes most gun owners. hack89 Apr 2013 #14
But voting for it and passing it into law means they have to provide infrastructure for it. geckosfeet Apr 2013 #32
Distrust of government davidn3600 Apr 2013 #20
90% support background checks nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #22
90% want background checks but that doesn't mean 90% supported this bill davidn3600 Apr 2013 #24
Once again, the US senate nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #27
Only 4% of Americans think this is the most important issue davidn3600 Apr 2013 #29
Some of us are not nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #30
The US senate was not designed to support the will of the people. ... spin Apr 2013 #38
Yeah, but requiring supermajorities nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #42
I have to agree that that is a valid point. (n/t) spin Apr 2013 #45
Because it's their guns and not their lives. rightsideout Apr 2013 #28
Too many view a threat to their gun as a threat to their life n/t Mopar151 Apr 2013 #39
I agree about the background checks. But Newtown has NOTHING to do with that. Honeycombe8 Apr 2013 #33
If you "do not get it," it may be because you are offering a false choice and disregarding the AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #34
Let's take this one piece at a time.... Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #41
The problem isn't the background checks kudzu22 Apr 2013 #43
"Anti second amendment"? rrneck Apr 2013 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why are folks more concer...»Reply #40