Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 150,000 SQ.KM of Pacific with Fukushima nuclear material - ‘Remarkable’ amount released in ocean [View all]FBaggins
(26,748 posts)80. It's exactly what I wrote.
Last edited Sun Apr 21, 2013, 03:43 PM - Edit history (1)
The animated map I posted clearly shows a temperature anomaly around Fukushima.Nope. Let's look closer (as I advised you to)
And then closer still
Those bastards! They ran a pipe out into the Pacific so they could vent all that Fukushima heat without it looking like it came from the plant!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
150,000 SQ.KM of Pacific with Fukushima nuclear material - ‘Remarkable’ amount released in ocean [View all]
DeSwiss
Apr 2013
OP
Gee, it'd be nice if it wasn't up to independent researchers to pay attention to this stuff.
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2013
#2
Really? So where's the data on radioactive isotopes in, say, Pacific fish caught for sale in the US?
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2013
#12
Exactly. The EPA isn't measuring it. The FDA isn't measuring it. My point exactly.
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2013
#15
If you've actually read what I've written, I'm not "predisposed to think" anything.
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2013
#22
what's the recommended level of excess radiation exposure above natural background?
CreekDog
Apr 2013
#25
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.” ~George Orwell nt
DeSwiss
Apr 2013
#55
Is your mission in life to knock me for wondering about the stupidity of atomic power?
Octafish
Apr 2013
#58
You're not saying that you're responsible for the interpretation of the video, are you?
FBaggins
Apr 2013
#63
Really? Look at the map and see for yourself where the sea surface temperatures are highest.
Octafish
Apr 2013
#72