Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: He Is the NRA [View all]

ncsoapmaker

(25 posts)
19. Less than 5 min.
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 02:21 PM
Mar 2013

Rachel Maddow had a show about this last week. Her information said that it was less than 5 minutes from the time he shot out the glass to the time he killed himself. If you include the walking down the hall, into rooms...etc, it was a lot less than 5 minutes to shoot off those 155 rounds

He Is the NRA [View all] kpete Mar 2013 OP
Cold But Fair, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2013 #1
Yep. cliffordu Mar 2013 #6
Yes he is nt Progressive dog Mar 2013 #2
Another proud member of the NRA. sufrommich Mar 2013 #3
k & r DoBotherMe Mar 2013 #4
Yes but we only need background checks, not a ban on high-capacity weapons ... Myrina Mar 2013 #5
How does the 2nd "ensure domestic tranquility"? Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2013 #7
The tranquility of the grave pscot Mar 2013 #15
It did both...but only due to its miliia purposes. jmg257 Mar 2013 #21
That was back when the nation was along the East Coast.... Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2013 #27
Most definitely, nor was there a federal select militia aka national guard, jmg257 Mar 2013 #63
He Is the NRA The CCC Mar 2013 #8
A better measure of what, and what is your point? Squinch Mar 2013 #17
Less than 5 min. ncsoapmaker Mar 2013 #19
"I'm the NRA, and I vote"--Tim McVeigh nt geek tragedy Mar 2013 #9
Adam used what was handy Plucketeer Mar 2013 #10
This is proof just doing background checks is not the answer. For this many rounds to be fired in a Thinkingabout Mar 2013 #11
Of course, universal background checks is not going to solve the problem. lark Mar 2013 #12
THIS mwrguy Mar 2013 #43
The faces of the "Occupy" movement? Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #13
I don't know. IveWornAHundredPants Mar 2013 #14
. Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #16
"The FBI said the five self-proclaimed anarchists ... " baldguy Mar 2013 #20
Unfortunately for your argument... Chan790 Mar 2013 #24
The Occupiers thought they were Occupiers; that's why they showed-up to support them. Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #25
Uh, okay? IveWornAHundredPants Mar 2013 #23
I hear they have secret decoder rings too. Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #26
Well, that particular edict got him to the classroom without shooting his foot off, so there's that. IveWornAHundredPants Mar 2013 #29
So anything that has deadly consequences with questionable utility is subject Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #32
You got it in one! IveWornAHundredPants Mar 2013 #34
But if the number of crimes and death compared to overall utility is the deciding equation Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #35
Talk to someone who wants to ban alcohol about all that. IveWornAHundredPants Mar 2013 #42
But why guns when alcohol kills so many more, contributes to so much crime Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #45
I'm eating an apple and do not feel like having an orange at this time, thanks. IveWornAHundredPants Mar 2013 #51
i didn't know Occupy had training in Explosives JI7 Mar 2013 #53
Judging from the picture I'm not even sure they're trained in the use of soap. Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Mar 2013 #36
PPR? For posting a legitimate news story? Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Mar 2013 #40
But equating anyone who asserts their 2A rights with baby killers ISN'T trollish? Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Mar 2013 #46
No. Self-defense = good. Blowing-up bridges = bad Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Mar 2013 #49
They failed because they were --thankfully -- caught. And yes, anyone who would use violence Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Mar 2013 #57
Save the fake outrage. Blowing-up anything is not an exercise in political speech Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #62
Thank you, it is SICKENING. MoclipsHumptulips Mar 2013 #64
Let me guess: IveWornAHundredPants Mar 2013 #50
"They never had their hands on any actual explosives" Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #54
There was a manifest lack of trying. IveWornAHundredPants Mar 2013 #56
So much lack of trying they pleaded guilty. Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #59
You can pretend I'm defending them if it makes you feel better. IveWornAHundredPants Mar 2013 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Mar 2013 #58
There were probably some dogs at Occupy as well. moondust Mar 2013 #38
And which NRA certification criteria incite or contribute to rampage killings? Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #39
Which criteria prevent them? moondust Mar 2013 #60
Equating a failed attempt to damage property to an actaul massacre doesn't look good for you muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #65
Wow, if we handed out monthly awards for false equivalence and misdirection ThoughtCriminal Mar 2013 #66
How about a series of side by sides? SCVDem Mar 2013 #18
An excelent anti-NRA campaign...let's hope it catches on. nt jmg257 Mar 2013 #22
Um... What does that certificate have to do with anything. Glassunion Mar 2013 #28
I don't think pointing out leftynyc Mar 2013 #30
You misunderstand "my cause" Glassunion Mar 2013 #31
My apologies leftynyc Mar 2013 #67
Here's a member of the NRA. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Mar 2013 #41
Was there childs blood on .. 99Forever Mar 2013 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»He Is the NRA»Reply #19