Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Jumping John

(930 posts)
Sat Jan 26, 2013, 07:05 AM Jan 2013

Looks like Anonymous has hacked into the SCOTUS website - pissed about Swartz [View all]

http://www.ussc.gov/

Looks like Anonymous is pissed about how the USDOJ ran over Aaron Swartz.

If it's fixed by the time you read this, here's the youtube video posted before the text:



Citizens of the world,

Anonymous has observed for some time now the trajectory of justice in the United States with growing concern. We have marked the departure of this system from the noble ideals in which it was born and enshrined. We have seen the erosion of due process, the dilution of constitutional rights, the usurpation of the rightful authority of courts by the "discretion" of prosecutors. We have seen how the law is wielded less and less to uphold justice, and more and more to exercise control, authority and power in the interests of oppression or personal gain.

We have been watching, and waiting.

Two weeks ago today, a line was crossed. Two weeks ago today, Aaron Swartz was killed. Killed because he faced an impossible choice. Killed because he was forced into playing a game he could not win -- a twisted and distorted perversion of justice -- a game where the only winning move was not to play.

Anonymous immediately convened an emergency council to discuss our response to this tragedy. After much heavy-hearted discussion, the decision was upheld to engage the United States Department of Justice and its associated executive branches in a game of a similar nature, a game in which the only winning move is not to play.

Last year the Federal Bureau of Investigation revelled in porcine glee at its successful infiltration of certain elements of Anonymous. This infiltration was achieved through the use of the *same tactics which lead to Aaron Swartz' death. It would not have been possible were it not for the power of federal prosecutors to thoroughly destroy the lives of any hacktivists they apprehend through the very real threat of highly disproportionate sentencing.

As a result of the FBI's infiltration and entrapment tactics, several more of our brethren now face similar disproportionate persecution, the balance of their lives hanging on the severely skewed scales of a broken justice system.

We have felt within our hearts a burning rage in reaction to these events, but we have not allowed ourselves to be drawn into a foolish and premature response. We have bidden our time, operating in the shadows, adapting our tactics and honing our abilities. We have allowed the FBI and its masters in government -- both the puppet and the shadow government that controls it -- to believe they had struck a crippling blow to our infrastructure, that they had demoralized us, paralyzed us with paranoia and fear. We have held our tongue and waited.

With Aaron's death we can wait no longer. The time has come to show the United States Department of Justice and its affiliates the true meaning of infiltration. The time has come to give this system a taste of its own medicine. The time has come for them to feel the helplessness and fear that comes with being forced into a game where the odds are stacked against them.

This website was chosen due to the symbolic nature of its purpose -- the federal sentencing guidelines which enable prosecutors to cheat citizens of their constitutionally-guaranteed right to a fair trial, by a jury of their peers -- the federal sentencing guidelines which are in clear violation of the 8th amendment protection against cruel and unusual punishments. This website was also chosen due to the nature of its visitors. It is far from the only government asset we control, and we have exercised such control for quite some time...

There has been a lot of fuss recently in the technological media regarding such operations as Red October, the widespread use of vulnerable browsers and the availability of zero-day exploits for these browsers and their plugins. None of this comes of course as any surprise to us, but it is perhaps good that those within the information security industry are making the extent of these threats more widely understood.

Still there is nothing quite as educational as a well-conducted demonstration...

Through this websites and various others that will remain unnamed, we have been conducting our own infiltration. We did not restrict ourselves like the FBI to one high-profile compromise. We are far more ambitious, and far more capable. Over the last two weeks we have wound down this operation, removed all traces of leakware from the compromised systems, and taken down the injection apparatus used to detect and exploit vulnerable machines.

We have enough fissile material for multiple warheads. Today we are launching the first of these. Operation Last Resort has begun...

Warhead - U S - D O J - L E A - 2013 . A E E 256 is primed and armed. It has been quietly distributed to numerous mirrors over the last few days and is available for download from this website now. We encourage all Anonymous to syndicate this file as widely as possible.

The contents are various and we won't ruin the speculation by revealing them. Suffice it to say, everyone has secrets, and some things are not meant to be public. At a regular interval commencing today, we will choose one media outlet and supply them with heavily redacted partial contents of the file. Any media outlets wishing to be eligible for this program must include within their reporting a means of secure communications.

We have not taken this action lightly, nor without consideration of the possible consequences. Should we be forced to reveal the trigger-key to this warhead, we understand that there will be collateral damage. We appreciate that many who work within the justice system believe in those principles that it has lost, corrupted, or abandoned, that they do not bear the full responsibility for the damages caused by their occupation.

It is our hope that this warhead need never be detonated.

However, in order for there to be a peaceful resolution to this crisis, certain things need to happen. There must be reform of outdated and poorly-envisioned legislation, written to be so broadly applied as to make a felony crime out of violation of terms of service, creating in effect vast swathes of crimes, and allowing for selective punishment. There must be reform of mandatory minimum sentencing. There must be a return to proportionality of punishment with respect to actual harm caused, and consideration of motive and mens rea. The inalienable right to a presumption of innocence and the recourse to trial and possibility of exoneration must be returned to its sacred status, and not gambled away by pre-trial bargaining in the face of overwhelming sentences, unaffordable justice and disfavourable odds. Laws must be upheld unselectively, and not used as a weapon of government to make examples of those it deems threatening to its power.

For good reason the statue of lady justice is blindfolded. No more should her innocence be besmirked, her scales tipped, nor her swordhand guided. Furthermore there must be a solemn commitment to freedom of the internet, this last great common space of humanity, and to the common ownership of information to further the common good.

We make this statement do not expect to be negotiated with; we do not desire to be negotiated with. We understand that due to the actions we take we exclude ourselves from the system within which solutions are found. There are others who serve that purpose, people far more respectable than us, people whose voices emerge from the light, and not the shadows. These voices are already making clear the reforms that have been necessary for some time, and are outright required now.

It is these people that the justice system, the government, and law enforcement must engage with. Their voices are already ringing strong with a chorus of determined resolution. We demand only that this chorus is not ignored. We demand the government does not make the mistake of hoping that time will dampen its ringing, that they can ride out this wave of determination, that business as usual can continue after a sufficient period of lip-service and back-patting.


Not this time. This time there will be change, or there will be chaos...

-Anonymous


Links to the encrypted data they stole:

http://buy.relevantproperties.com/Scalia.Warhead1
http://buy.relevantproperties.com/Kennedy.Warhead1
http://buy.relevantproperties.com/Thomas.Warhead1
http://buy.relevantproperties.com/Ginsburg.Warhead1
http://buy.relevantproperties.com/Breyer.Warhead1
http://buy.relevantproperties.com/Roberts.Warhead1
http://buy.relevantproperties.com/Alito.Warhead1
http://buy.relevantproperties.com/Sotomayor.Warhead1
http://buy.relevantproperties.com/Kagan.Warhead1

This looks interesting...

They also made the original website editable by anyone, follow the link at the end on the website. It's amusing to play with.
186 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If this were Columbo, it would sound like a terroristic blackmail threat graham4anything Jan 2013 #1
So which wing is the extremism of the Patriot Act aligned with? n/t Jumping John Jan 2013 #2
3000 people REAL PEOPLE died on 9-11. though conspriacy theorist loons think otherwise graham4anything Jan 2013 #5
Has nothing to do with V for Vendetta RandiFan1290 Jan 2013 #8
"3,000 real people died on 9/11" and "hacking should be charged as terrorism" Scootaloo Jan 2013 #16
real people are being sent to prison unjustly while 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #30
How about Bernie Madoff and Dennis Koslowski? Both are in jail. Mega rich people. graham4anything Jan 2013 #31
both eh 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #33
first they came for the rich, and nobody cared graham4anything Jan 2013 #43
First they came for the rich? 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #54
but going after the rich is delicious today, but you would be hungry tomorrow graham4anything Jan 2013 #61
the rich are sitting on all of the money 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #65
When nineteen50 Jan 2013 #73
Is there a middle class anymore? Are we still using that antiquated bell curve to define ourselves? littlemissmartypants Jan 2013 #84
At the very least, they would no longer be able annabanana Jan 2013 #111
what about next year? graham4anything Jan 2013 #137
Once you have devoured all classes tama Jan 2013 #136
6:30AM, I'm still in bed, and laughing out loud DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2013 #89
Amen! nt Walk away Jan 2013 #105
Ah, the poor, poor, put upon rich........ socialist_n_TN Jan 2013 #125
This post is disgusting. Using Martin Niemöller statement in this context is beyond the pale. idwiyo Jan 2013 #161
This is a comedy routine, right? JackRiddler Jan 2013 #169
Dark Knight is totally right extreme 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #41
Not applicable corrolation.Are you a fan of the NRA using their soundbytes? graham4anything Jan 2013 #47
not sure what sound bites of the NRA u speak of. 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #50
I am still waiting to know what point black is, besides the def. I said,but it must be a gotcha graham4anything Jan 2013 #55
ur losing me batman. 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #58
Do your own research into Choice Point and the 2000 election RandiFan1290 Jan 2013 #72
This message was self-deleted by its author 1monster Jan 2013 #132
Bernie is in jail because he was robbing his rich friends, Koslowski paid bribes. idwiyo Jan 2013 #160
Yep. That's the difference. These guys (or Madoff at least)...... socialist_n_TN Jan 2013 #166
graham4anything is playing a game, lets see how long before he crosses the line. idwiyo Jan 2013 #167
No, you have it backwards. First the one percent came for the poor. Then they came for DogPawsBiscuitsNGrav Jan 2013 #176
The poor are part of the 99%. Th1onein Jan 2013 #177
OMG thank you! It was meant to say the one percent. I fixed it. DogPawsBiscuitsNGrav Jan 2013 #179
no... tomp Jan 2013 #68
Question: Gore1FL Jan 2013 #77
very late response, but for the record. tomp Feb 2013 #184
Orly Taittz is the crazed birther lady Gore1FL Feb 2013 #185
look, i work in psychiatry. tomp Feb 2013 #186
9/11 was a conspiracy. They just disagree on whose. caseymoz Jan 2013 #87
ah, no it doesn't make sense logically graham4anything Jan 2013 #134
I didn't argue that thousands of people did anything. caseymoz Jan 2013 #141
the 60s protesters that grew up, ran for office, or later saw that working from within is better graham4anything Jan 2013 #143
I agree. Yield to the tyranny, it will go so much easier. nm rhett o rick Jan 2013 #128
It is the Ralph Nader wing of course. Because, fools like Nader said both parties were the same graham4anything Jan 2013 #11
What about the Cristites? RandiFan1290 Jan 2013 #12
+1 HiPointDem Jan 2013 #17
A diversion from Presidential politics into local politics. But since you brought it up- graham4anything Jan 2013 #18
Are you waiting for beer and travel money?? RandiFan1290 Jan 2013 #20
No, but those who back anarchists have their say, I will continue to speak against Nader & his cult graham4anything Jan 2013 #21
Choice Point came before Ralph RandiFan1290 Jan 2013 #25
what is this word you are using? graham4anything Jan 2013 #26
You pretend to know so much about the 2000 election RandiFan1290 Jan 2013 #27
Choice Point in my definition fits Ralph Nader to a T graham4anything Jan 2013 #28
Choice Point was a company that created a list of "felons" who freedom fighter jh Jan 2013 #113
again, that was Florida. Gore would have won NH and other states without Florida mattering. graham4anything Jan 2013 #121
Just trying to answer your question. freedom fighter jh Jan 2013 #122
Doesn't matter what you say RandiFan1290 Jan 2013 #123
+1000 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #44
wow, just wow 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #32
It's like you have a math tutor telling you that 3+3=8. If they are wrong on the basic facts, Autumn Jan 2013 #106
Are you saying Anon. is an Anarchist group? Lordquinton Jan 2013 #150
Who asked them to? Was a vote taken? Was a poll taken? What do we do now? graham4anything Jan 2013 #151
Threats lead to dangerous things Lordquinton Jan 2013 #154
No, I disagree. They are doing this all to themselves. No one is after them. graham4anything Jan 2013 #155
Woah, come back to us! Lordquinton Jan 2013 #156
No, I am saying he had many problems, and would have done the same thing, statistically speaking graham4anything Jan 2013 #157
So you're an expert on Mr. Schwartz's mental state? Lordquinton Jan 2013 #158
Batman works with Comm. Gordon, both in the tv version, the comic and the movies graham4anything Jan 2013 #159
Hey now, at least RT made sense to me sometimes. nt raouldukelives Jan 2013 #183
Not ducks, a pet goat. Al Gore won the election. A corrupt supreme court appointed Autumn Jan 2013 #92
The court decision was 12/12/2000. Ralph Nader spent months earlier keeping people home graham4anything Jan 2013 #170
And when the votes were counted, enough people had gone out to vote Autumn Jan 2013 #172
12/12/2000 was just a reaction to the actions/consequences of Nader many months PRIOR graham4anything Jan 2013 #173
Al Gore won the election regardless of anything leading up to the election. Autumn Jan 2013 #174
I am looking at my placemat of the presidents I got at the Lincoln memorial a number of years ago graham4anything Jan 2013 #178
anti-"conspiracy" AND anti-Nader = loser x 2. tomp Jan 2013 #70
the rich wing 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #29
Are you mad, brah? RandiFan1290 Jan 2013 #4
One Man’s Terrorist is Another Man’s Freedom Fighter stultusporcos Jan 2013 #45
If you read any of their statement caseymoz Jan 2013 #88
Yeah, kind of like our First Continental Congress... damn those anarchists!! Melinda Jan 2013 #124
"rightwing extremism" LOL....... socialist_n_TN Jan 2013 #126
Biggest surprise: Clarence Thomas has only sent one email since being confirmed as a justice ... Scuba Jan 2013 #3
not true... George II Jan 2013 #81
Go Anonymous newfie11 Jan 2013 #6
anarchists, rightwing extremists and 3rd parties have no place on a democratic board graham4anything Jan 2013 #7
I smell a Ralph coming! RandiFan1290 Jan 2013 #10
If not them, who? newfie11 Jan 2013 #14
I think the only injustice he can see 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #34
Is that poster intentionally trying to be a parody? littleswan Jan 2013 #60
Take your complaint to Meta tama Jan 2013 #49
+1 Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #78
Who then? Columbo? caseymoz Jan 2013 #90
First and 3rd are definitely welcome here as long as they follow the TOS for DU. idwiyo Jan 2013 #162
which means not tearing down the democratic party and whining police state graham4anything Jan 2013 #163
I do think you need to step away from PC for a little bit. You are not making any sense. idwiyo Jan 2013 #165
BTW, if you want some fictional character to be admired, admire The Dark Knight not V graham4anything Jan 2013 #9
No we as a country will sit on our butts and complain newfie11 Jan 2013 #15
The way to change is to run for office FROM WITHIN. Not anarchy from the right graham4anything Jan 2013 #19
The cost of running for office makes it difficult newfie11 Jan 2013 #23
President Obama did. Jerry Brown did.besides, there are ways if one is anti-gun graham4anything Jan 2013 #24
oh, you are one of those guys that works for an official 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #36
You say running for office is "the way" to bring change? Chef Eric Jan 2013 #40
Dr. King might have been VP with Jimmy Carter and President thereafter graham4anything Jan 2013 #51
Your posts are ridiculous. Chef Eric Jan 2013 #85
Something something something Hillary45 theKed Jan 2013 #93
his m.o. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #144
Mon dieu...... marmar Jan 2013 #96
I've grown weary of facepalms tama Jan 2013 #140
Fredrick Douglas did run for office loyalsister Jan 2013 #147
Thanks. Now I know. nt Chef Eric Jan 2013 #149
lol and anti Occupy 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #39
I am not anti-Occupy. Please do not distort what I said graham4anything Jan 2013 #52
The Dark Knight is actually a libertarian hero littleswan Jan 2013 #63
A better comparison is Paul Kersey in Death Wish and Bernie Goetz real life graham4anything Jan 2013 #76
Please. theKed Jan 2013 #95
that's the intent. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #145
The only resemblence between V and anonymous caseymoz Jan 2013 #94
How about you shut down your PC, make yourself a nice cup of tea, sit down and relax. idwiyo Jan 2013 #164
Frank Miller, author of Dark Knight, is very right wing and pro Bush, many consider his work post Bluenorthwest Jan 2013 #182
it's offline now... HiPointDem Jan 2013 #13
To paraphrase Wellington . . . another_liberal Jan 2013 #22
I may have some ambivalence about Anonymous, I have none at all about Aaron Schwartz ..... marble falls Jan 2013 #35
U R right. 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #37
What's the crock part??? marble falls Jan 2013 #42
so sorry 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #46
s'cool. marble falls Jan 2013 #57
The laws for the rich are different than the laws for the poor. There is nothing fair in that. marble falls Jan 2013 #59
This reminds one of the super-duper secret Assange files he promised to explode. randome Jan 2013 #38
tis true that I wonder about how much power 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #48
I don't agree they are all we have. randome Jan 2013 #53
Occupy and Anonymous 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #56
I think you're right about that. They are all we have and they've managed to get the talking .... marble falls Jan 2013 #64
Speaking Truth to Power tama Jan 2013 #69
I think a lot of people were quietly thinking they were a minority in a world of teabaggery .... marble falls Jan 2013 #74
You fell for it as a nation tama Jan 2013 #86
Changing the talking points was not enough. randome Jan 2013 #71
no, that's why they hack 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #75
No doubt, but it got a lot more voices and a divergent opinion into the discussion ... marble falls Jan 2013 #79
By tama Jan 2013 #107
So how did they convene their 'emergency council' then? randome Jan 2013 #109
I respect that point tama Jan 2013 #112
Same to you! randome Jan 2013 #115
no, big change is *not* incremental. the ptb would have us believe it is, though. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #146
Read the statement tama Jan 2013 #62
'Prejudice'? Where does that come from? randome Jan 2013 #67
Your prejudice tama Jan 2013 #80
A promise to 'bring the banks to their knees' sounds kind of sinister. randome Jan 2013 #83
Ending class war tama Jan 2013 #98
'taking side with banks'. You keep trying to put words in my hands. randome Jan 2013 #101
That was inferred tama Jan 2013 #117
This is a great piece of writing. caseymoz Jan 2013 #97
It's the U.S. Sentencing Commission, not the Supreme Court freedom fighter jh Jan 2013 #66
The rule of fear is not the rule of reason. burnsei sensei Jan 2013 #82
Can you explain? freedom fighter jh Jan 2013 #91
+1 ^^^^. . . n/t annabanana Jan 2013 #116
That's not all they're protesting, though. caseymoz Jan 2013 #99
How are they protesting anything? randome Jan 2013 #102
People tried revolution in the 20th century. caseymoz Jan 2013 #114
Aside from anarchist tama Jan 2013 #138
You misunderstand me. caseymoz Jan 2013 #142
Then it was happy misunderstanding tama Jan 2013 #148
They took insurance, like Assange Lordquinton Jan 2013 #152
I hope this explains it burnsei sensei Jan 2013 #104
Thanks for the explanation. freedom fighter jh Jan 2013 #110
<3 Marrah_G Jan 2013 #100
+1 tama Jan 2013 #139
Memo to the U.S. Department of Justice: you might start by investigating coalition_unwilling Jan 2013 #103
Yep. Double-click ECHELON. Ctrl-F "have bidden", "has bidden" jsr Jan 2013 #108
FREE THE ANONS. Fire Walk With Me Jan 2013 #118
Tsk. Tsk. Mustn't annoy the bosses. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2013 #119
So...make a YouTube video holding a gun and threatening the government Dreamer Tatum Jan 2013 #120
All these calls for revolution are quite troubling. nt EastKYLiberal Jan 2013 #127
I am fine with revolution, just not at the behest of dickheads in masks nt Dreamer Tatum Jan 2013 #129
'Dickheads in masks' who encourage others to do the work FOR them. randome Jan 2013 #130
Makes you wonder what they'll do if you refuse nt Dreamer Tatum Jan 2013 #131
the clearest corrolation seems to be what V(fiction) did, and what Tim McVeigh delusionally did graham4anything Jan 2013 #133
They threatened no one's life Lordquinton Jan 2013 #153
There would be hundreds of recs if a republican administration was in office. n/t Puzzledtraveller Jan 2013 #135
Actions speak louder than words Oilwellian Jan 2013 #168
kick samsingh Jan 2013 #171
K&R idwiyo Jan 2013 #175
Our Justice Department isn't about Justice lovuian Jan 2013 #180
After the filibuster failure, I trust Anonymous and Occupy more than the government. Zorra Jan 2013 #181
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Looks like Anonymous has ...