Trump Alters National Review Article, Deletes That Affair Allegations Could Have "Torpedoed" His Campaign

[Ms. Toad]

11. For what?

I didn't track the entire article, but he uses the standard notation for omissions in the first omitted section.

Unpacking a weak argument for Alvin Bragg’s weak case against the former president

. . . We can be confident that there were two campaign-finance felonies, they tell us, because Cohen pled guilty to them in a prosecution brought by Trump’s own Justice Department.

Elipses mean that text was omitted from the quoted content. In this case several paragraphs were omitted.

Is Trump omitting parts he doesnt' like? Sure. Does he hope no one will notice? Sure.

But there's nothing to sue over, since his is (at least in the instance I tracked) declaring that he omitted stuff, so he's not putting words in their mouths.