Clarence Thomas Calls Veteran's Argument 'Especially Unconvincing' [View all]
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas called a veteran's arguments "especially unconvincing" this week as the court issued an opinion on a case involving benefits for former U.S. service members.
"Rudisill's contrary argument is especially unconvincing given that Congress included other period-of-service limitations in the very subchapter at issue," Thomas wrote in his dissenting opinion on the Rudisill v. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs case.
The context:
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in the Rudisill v. McDonough case, siding with the veteran in a 7-2 ruling.
-snip-
Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito wrote a dissenting opinion.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/clarence-thomas-calls-veteran-s-argument-especially-unconvincing/ar-BB1lJfu2
The two biggest assholes on the court.
= new reply since forum marked as read