Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Renew Deal

(81,859 posts)
11. AI is not better for hiring and can be pretty problematic
Wed Mar 27, 2024, 11:45 AM
Mar 27
https://www.ml.cmu.edu/news/news-archive/2016-2020/2018/october/amazon-scraps-secret-artificial-intelligence-recruiting-engine-that-showed-biases-against-women.html

https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/news/hr-magazine/applicant-tracking-system-hurting-recruiting-efforts

It could be better for writing reports if it's fed good quality information and a person reviews.
It could be good for planning.
It's not good at all for conducting meetings.
It's not great with spreadsheets, but it is good with analyzing data in spreadsheets.
It can be great for presentations.
AI is not better than humans at sexual harassment. Fake nudes are not a good example.
It can be good for sending emails based on existing information and with heavy human review.
It depends on what you mean by "altering financials."

That said, most managers don't have the negative aspects you portrayed.

You are correct about the ultimate goal. Many "owners" would like companies to be as lean as possible and that includes humans. That's why it's good to be the owner or the operator of the AI system.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»3000 managers surveyed: T...»Reply #11