General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Justice for JFK [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)thread attacking anyone who merely has an interest in questioning some of the evidence, some who never saw it before. His attitude towards anyone not accepting his view of the evidence has been to attack them, call them CTs and in my case claim I was lying about having read the WCR and being 'willing to bet on it'.
I have already stated to him that he has clearly studied this historical event and it is too bad that rather than being willing to share the info he has, he has taken the attitude of attacking and attempting to discredit anyone who even dares to ask a question. That is the reason he is getting the reaction he is getting.
I eg, am no CT. Nor have I spent a huge amount of time reading about the Assassination. But when the subject comes up, I see things that raise questions for me. I have been called a CT and even had an implication that I am a 'birther' in this thread, simply for being willing to discuss the topic.
It's too bad to have had this attitude in the thread as most people who have commented have been very rational and thoughtful only to be attacked and labeled as CTs with efforts to shut down the conversation.
Like you, the more I see this opposition to any honest questions, the more I think it's time for me too to start studying it more. It was after all, a tragedy that changed the course of this country's history.
Sorry to go on, but just wanted to explain the reaction you may be seeing to Stopbush. I hope he will calm down and share his info and be willing to acknowledge info from other people, rather than lash out at them as he has been doing.