General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Justice for JFK [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)sub-thread? Again, to review. I responded to a post claiming that this thread should be in the CT forum by saying I saw no CTs what I saw were Questions and Opinions, with no one claiming their opinions were facts.
You, in post #119, asked what questions I could possibly have re the WCR. Seems to me you were disbelieving my statement that people do have legitimate questions about that Report.
After some false allegations and an attempt at some impressive mind-reading from Stopbush, and even a bet that I had not read the WCR, (haven't yet received an apology for that btw) I answered your question by providing you with one of the WCR claims in its report.
And you know what happened after that, you set about, ironically, proving the WRC wrong. And failed.
So it appears you now have some questions yourself (considering the trouble you went to prove them wrong) about the WCR raising the question, why you attacked others who do?