Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Donald Trump is NOT eligible to run for President. Period. [View all]gristy
(10,667 posts)17. Yes. Both Takket and the OP address this point.
Takket:
It also appears that the whole "president is not an officer" bullshit was also called out specifically in the original debate. So toss that in the trash too.
OP:
It's also worth noting that there was just a single reference in the Senate debate to the fact that the president and vice president were not explicitly mentioned in Howard's draft as "officer(s) of the United States," the way members of Congress and state officials had been itemized in the text. Would the disqualification clause of the amendment not cover the top posts in the executive branch?
"Why did you omit to exclude them?" asked Maryland Democratic Sen. Reverdy Johnson.
Maine's Lot Morrill jumped in to clarify.
"Let me call the Senator's attention to the words 'or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States,'" Morrill said, ending the discussion on that point.
"Why did you omit to exclude them?" asked Maryland Democratic Sen. Reverdy Johnson.
Maine's Lot Morrill jumped in to clarify.
"Let me call the Senator's attention to the words 'or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States,'" Morrill said, ending the discussion on that point.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Agree. He disqualified himself by trying to rip off a free and fair election.
onecaliberal
Dec 2023
#2
I know SCOTUS is going to dismiss this, because they suck, but it is clear drumpf is disqualified
Takket
Dec 2023
#10
The framers addressed that as I understand it (?) "Officers" does not exclude POTUS or VP...
CousinIT
Dec 2023
#22
Here's the problem. There's no legal finding of participating in an insurrection.
WarGamer
Dec 2023
#21
No legal finding or conviction. But the entire nation saw it, heard him incite it.
CousinIT
Dec 2023
#24
So, if Trump's insurrection had succeeded, we would have needed his DOJ to prosecute him...
W_HAMILTON
Jan 2024
#56
We know he did it, but think one has to be adjudicated an insurrectionist, unless
Silent Type
Dec 2023
#31
When the Colorado judge orders a sentence hearing for insurrection, we have him.
Silent Type
Dec 2023
#43