Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mvymvy

(309 posts)
15. Maine and Nebraska do not apportion their electoral votes to reflect the breakdown of each state's popular vote
Wed Nov 22, 2023, 03:30 PM
Nov 2023

Maine (since enacting a state law in 1969) and Nebraska (since enacting a state law in 1992) have awarded one electoral vote to the winner of each congressional district, and two electoral votes statewide.

When Nebraska in 2008 gave one electoral vote to the candidate who did not win the state, it was the first split electoral vote of any state in the past century.

2016 was the first time one electoral vote in Maine was given to the candidate who did not win the state.

In June 2019, 77 Maine state Representatives and 21 Maine state Senators supported the National Popular Vote bill.

In a March 12-13, 2019 poll, Maine voters were asked how the President should be elected

52% favored “a system where the candidate who gets the most popular votes in all 50 states is the winner.”

31% favored “a system where electoral votes are given out by Congressional district” --- Maine’s current method for awarding 2 of its 4 electoral votes

16% favored “a system where all the electoral votes in a given state are awarded to whoever gets the most popular votes in that state” --- the winner-take-all method currently used by 48 states and used in Maine to award 2 of its 4 electoral votes

Recent campaigns have paid attention to Nebraska’s closely divided 2nd congressional district (the Omaha area), while totally ignoring the rural and politically non-competitive 1st and 3rd districts.

After Obama won 1 congressional district in Nebraska in 2008,Nebraska Republicans moved that district to make it more Republican to avoid another GOP loss there, and the leadership committee of the Nebraska Republican Party promptly adopted a resolution requiring all GOP elected officials to favor overturning their district method for awarding electoral votes or lose the party’s support.
A GOP push to return Nebraska to a winner-take-all system of awarding its electoral college votes for president only barely failed in March 2015 and April 2016.
In 2021, after Biden won 1 electoral vote, another Republican sponsored bill to change to statewide winner-take-all was introduced, again,
In 2021, a Republican redistricting proposal would cleave off Democratic-leaning northwest Douglas County from a Nebraska congressional district that has been won by presidential and congressional Democrats at various points over the past decade.
In 2023, another bill was introduce to strike language in existing state law that divides Nebraska’s electoral votes by congressional districts in presidential elections, effectively implementing a winner-take-all system used by nearly every other state.

The National Popular Vote bill is the way to make every person's vote equal and matter to their candidate because it guarantees the majority of Electoral College votes to the candidate who gets the most votes among all 50 states and DC.

A small number of states do that, Maine and Nebraska? Voltaire2 Nov 2023 #1
solution would be Federal law applying to all states? Stardust Mirror Nov 2023 #4
I don't think it can. Voltaire2 Nov 2023 #5
could an individual sue his state Stardust Mirror Nov 2023 #6
this talks about that law, I guess I was wrong: Stardust Mirror Nov 2023 #7
When it comes to choosing electors, the state's power is nearly absolute Sympthsical Nov 2023 #17
Maine and Nebraska do not apportion their electoral votes to reflect the breakdown of each state's popular vote mvymvy Nov 2023 #15
Maine and Nebraska do not allocate electoral votes proportionately onenote Nov 2023 #16
At least one state already does MichMan Nov 2023 #2
Two states have porportional electors. I think this has been discussed as one way to get around EC winner take all. Silent Type Nov 2023 #3
No state has proportional electors mvymvy Nov 2023 #11
Another option is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact RandomNumbers Nov 2023 #8
interesting, thanks Stardust Mirror Nov 2023 #9
Increases risk of House deciding, regardless of any popular votes mvymvy Nov 2023 #10
Thank you. That's why I asked - to get reasoned answers Stardust Mirror Nov 2023 #14
Why would a State that doesn't want to give up the EC agree to district their EC votes proportionally? brooklynite Nov 2023 #12
Get rid of gerrymandering, and we'll talk about it. haele Nov 2023 #13
Gerrymandering inthewind21 Nov 2023 #18
However, if you split up the EC votes proportionally, gerrymandering will affect the count. haele Nov 2023 #20
If you think gerrymandered districts are bad now, it'll get worse if the Presidency depends on it In It to Win It Nov 2023 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What if states' Electoral...»Reply #15