Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mcar

(42,331 posts)
Wed Jun 14, 2023, 02:21 PM Jun 2023

A sigh of relief regarding Judge Cannon [View all]

Last edited Wed Jun 14, 2023, 05:18 PM - Edit history (1)

I follow this person on socials Mueller, She Wrote. She knows what she is talking about, as does Joyce Vance.

https://post.news/@/MuellerSheWrote/2RA1WOJvqONKL4HDaDVwYlhpB4s

A Sigh of Relief Regarding Judge Cannon
Joyce Vance just gave us all a reason to breathe a HUGE sigh of relief. Last week, when we learned the trump case had been assigned to Judge Aileen Cannon, I argued that Jack Smith had considered all the possible outcomes, including having Cannon preside over the prosecution.

Today, we found out WHY Jack Smith seems unworried. Because this case includes national defense information as defined by the Espionage Act, it will be governed by the rules of the Confidential Information Production Act, or CIPA.

Joyce just told god and everybody that there's a provision in CIPA that allows for an IMMEDIATE right of EXPEDITED APPEAL. So what does that mean?

It means that if Judge Cannon makes a ridiculous ruling that DoJ wants to appeal, SHE does NOT get to set the briefing schedule. The DoJ can appeal IMMEDIATELY to the 11th circuit - the same circuit that vacated TWO of Cannon's rulings in the Special Master case.

Further, DoJ can utilize that trigger to IMMEDIATELY ask the 11th circuit to reassign the case to a different judge. No delay allowed under CIPA - at least not a substantial one. This will prevent Cannon from delaying unnecessarily, and hopefully make her think twice about issuing ridiculous rulings lest she be thrown off the case in short order.

Jack Smith knew about this remedy going in, and he said in his press conference that he's going to move for a speedy trial.

This weekend, Andy McCabe and I will discuss this and other CIPA provisions with the former general counsel of the CIA - a CIPA expert - on the JACK podcast. So download and listen for free, and please follow me and leave a tip if you so desire because my content here will always be free. This kind of information is too important to put behind a paywall.

69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good to know! Ocelot II Jun 2023 #1
Ditto! DippyDem Jun 2023 #14
A little sigh from me. riversedge Jun 2023 #2
I knew that, gab13by13 Jun 2023 #3
Those are reasonable questions mcar Jun 2023 #10
Not a lot different DENVERPOPS Jun 2023 #24
There Is No Reason In Fascism - Cannon Is A Fascist Through And Though - Time Will Tell MayReasonRule Jun 2023 #39
Yes. LudwigPastorius Jun 2023 #51
I was just now skimming article titles for jury selection and the trial date. msfiddlestix Jun 2023 #61
Then shouldn't the Chief Judge on that court have a backup ready to go? Grins Jun 2023 #4
A note of caution: Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #5
+1 dalton99a Jun 2023 #7
You are correct. The right of DOJ to bring an interlocutory appeal is quite narrow under CIPA onenote Jun 2023 #12
One modification FBaggins Jun 2023 #23
Recommended. H2O Man Jun 2023 #6
Mahalo for this Encouraging Cha Jun 2023 #8
K&R Bayard Jun 2023 #9
The tweet about Vance reads more into what she said than is there. onenote Jun 2023 #11
And you are more qualified than Joyce Vance to address this because??? triron Jun 2023 #13
Where did Joyce Vance disagree with this? FBaggins Jun 2023 #20
Maybe you should tweet this to JV senseandsensibility Jun 2023 #15
The actual text of the act is superior... FBaggins Jun 2023 #21
You are correct and I'll edit my posts to make it clear that the blogger is overreaching not Vance. onenote Jun 2023 #26
Thanks for clarification but now I m disappointed somewhat. triron Jun 2023 #45
I read Mueller She Wrote's piece and I read Joyce Vance's piece. Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2023 #28
Thank you chia Jun 2023 #44
Interesting. BlackSkimmer Jun 2023 #16
Good republianmushroom Jun 2023 #17
K&R for visibility. crickets Jun 2023 #18
Thanks rebe303 Jun 2023 #19
This makes my day better. Thanks! Hekate Jun 2023 #22
Here's a link to the podcast that will air this weekend when they'll discuss this in more detail. Native Jun 2023 #25
This is heartening to hear. Torchlight Jun 2023 #27
bookmarked. k&r nt orleans Jun 2023 #29
That's awesome, thanks for posting! GarColga Jun 2023 #30
While this may be a remedy for some concerns Zilli Jun 2023 #31
Well, we know what Trump once said wnylib Jun 2023 #32
Glad to hear that wendyb-NC Jun 2023 #33
Allison Gill (Mueller She Wrote) is not an attorney fyi Arazi Jun 2023 #34
Will correct. Thx mcar Jun 2023 #40
Thanks for the info. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2023 #35
Unless she takes the verductout of the jury's hand and finds trump not guilty that action is Fullduplexxx Jun 2023 #36
Yes, a directed verdict of not guilty would be a fucking nightmare Celerity Jun 2023 #53
Did someone inform Aileen about all this? SouthernDem4ever Jun 2023 #37
Let's hope She doesn't delay the trial YoshidaYui Jun 2023 #38
I'm not terribly worried about it because of other sources I've listened to mountain grammy Jun 2023 #41
horrifying thought! eeks! halobeam Jun 2023 #48
RIGHT !! uponit7771 Jun 2023 #50
Trust in Jack... MiHale Jun 2023 #42
Yep mcar Jun 2023 #43
Jack Smith: I GOT THIS Skittles Jun 2023 #46
You gotta figure. nt mcar Jun 2023 #47
Smith is to Cannon as Chess is to Checkers Takket Jun 2023 #49
Brings back memories of Mueller. C Moon Jun 2023 #52
I think... Mike Nelson Jun 2023 #54
Not to be a Debbie Downer and this is helpful to keeping Cannon in line on her rulings... hlthe2b Jun 2023 #55
I believe the prosecution can appeal a sentence that deviates significantly onenote Jun 2023 #56
If she makes a Rule 29 acquittal before the jury decision, no appeal. If after conviction, then hlthe2b Jun 2023 #68
Again, she's got a lifetime appointment as a federal judge Arazi Jun 2023 #64
Please read what I wrote. In terms of her self-destruction, it is reputation and hlthe2b Jun 2023 #66
She can find him not guilty even before jury gets it. End of case. GreenWave Jun 2023 #57
Yep. Saw that. Very much in opposition to the OP here suggesting we need not worry about Dark n Stormy Knight Jun 2023 #63
I also did not like the extreme leniency by DOJ GreenWave Jun 2023 #65
This is truly excellent news! I have been in a deep despair over this travesty. lark Jun 2023 #58
I wish we would stop telegraphing our game plans. In this case the strategies Jack Smith has. usaf-vet Jun 2023 #59
K & R malaise Jun 2023 #60
So Relieved BlueKota Jun 2023 #62
Keep in mind, Jack Smith didn't charge the more serious crime in Florida dlk Jun 2023 #67
Whew, indeed! WestCoastDem42 Jun 2023 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A sigh of relief regardin...