General Discussion

Scottie Mom

(5,812 posts)

50. I don't think that some states would have to pass new laws (thinking deep South red states).

Sat Jun 25, 2022, 04:01 PM

Jun 2022

Just like with Roe...when overturned, the laws on the books in the states that banned abortion, they became the controlling law for the state. Seems to me that there most likely are laws on the books that ban the mixing of races and but for Loving v. Virginia, they would pstill be in effect today. Overrule Loving...and voila...mixed race marriages are again banned and perhaps like in Virginia pre-Loving, criminalized.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Samuel L. Jackson goes in on Clarence Thomas with a Supreme Court decision reminder that hits close [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2022 OP

No worries. The state racial classification board will make him a honorary Aryan dalton99a Jun 2022 #1

THIS 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 LenaBaby61 Jun 2022 #6

Lol. nt ecstatic Jun 2022 #9

Thank You....Kicked for all to read the explanation. Please read it, It's important! Stuart G Jun 2022 #2

There's too many m'fckin snakes on this m'fckin Supreme Court! nt Buns_of_Fire Jun 2022 #3

U DA BEST. and you WIN my day! n/t MFGsunny Jun 2022 #7

LOL! Thread winnah! Trailrider1951 Jun 2022 #10

"Uncle Clarence" milestogo Jun 2022 #4

Yeah, he went there. Mr. Evil Jun 2022 #24

Thomas is a fucking hypocrite. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #5

He's self-hating and hates his own race. LenaBaby61 Jun 2022 #11

There is 0 chance Thomas resigns or is impeached PTWB Jun 2022 #14

14. There is 0 chance Thomas resigns or is impeached. LenaBaby61 Jun 2022 #15

What evidence do you have to support your confidence? PTWB Jun 2022 #28

a unicorn came to them in a dream and told them so ZonkerHarris Jun 2022 #52

IF it was possible and I do mean IF KS Toronado Jun 2022 #18

Im sure the other 5 would find a way to accomodate quakerboy Jun 2022 #35

Appointments to the Court are "on good behavior." malthaussen Jun 2022 #48

I replied ... Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2022 #8

K&R! dchill Jun 2022 #12

Samuel L is **ENTIRELY** too cool 😎 dixiechiken1 Jun 2022 #13

WELL OF COURSE YoshidaYui Jun 2022 #27

It's already being pushed... Pluvious Jun 2022 #16

Mais naturellement. malthaussen Jun 2022 #49

Get this motherfucking judge off my motherfucking Supreme Court! ZonkerHarris Jun 2022 #17

hahahahaha JohnnyRingo Jun 2022 #44

job done. Enjoy the sunshine. ZonkerHarris Jun 2022 #51

Justice ThomASS would love to reverse Loving v Virginia...why? SayItLoud Jun 2022 #19

It just hit me! Of course, how could we be so blind? jaxexpat Jun 2022 #20

There is no chance of Thomas resigning.... until he does Tetrachloride Jun 2022 #21

I'll be impressed when celebrities refuse to work in states that don't protect reproductive rights. Fiendish Thingy Jun 2022 #22

Right after "you" decide to not work in a state that doesn't protect reproductive rights. Ferrets are Cool Jun 2022 #37

Fair enough- I live in Canada, used to live in California. Fiendish Thingy Jun 2022 #40

I'm in an interracial marriage LittleGirl Jun 2022 #23

I agree SouthernLiberal Jun 2022 #55

thomas probably lives in a blue state so I'm sure he will say fuck anyone else's rights mucifer Jun 2022 #25

WELL OF COURSE, HE IS A JEDI WITH A PURPLE light saber!!! YoshidaYui Jun 2022 #26

"Uncle Clarence." Now, that's a good burn. n/t malthaussen Jun 2022 #29

Should be BonnieJW Jun 2022 #42

Very good! n/t malthaussen Jun 2022 #45

If Thomas had married in the 50s what would had happened to him? LiberalFighter Jun 2022 #30

Well, if he and Ginni had gotten married in Virginia... Scottie Mom Jun 2022 #33

Clarence 's revenge scipan Jun 2022 #31

That makes no sense, Uncle Clarence. rubbersole Jun 2022 #34

How Did Liberals Make His Life Hell For 43 Years? erpowers Jun 2022 #39

Loving v. Virginia is based on privacy rights of the U.S. Const. Scottie Mom Jun 2022 #32

It would be interesting to hear a state's rationale for passing a new miscegenation law. sop Jun 2022 #38

Indeed. Hard to see how it could be done without being overtly racist. malthaussen Jun 2022 #47

I don't think that some states would have to pass new laws (thinking deep South red states). Scottie Mom Jun 2022 #50

SC justices, ie KINGS, would be given special dispensation, right? Ferrets are Cool Jun 2022 #36

Never thought of that. JohnnyRingo Jun 2022 #41

It fits Mblaze Jun 2022 #43

somebody made a good point treestar Jun 2022 #54

Clarence Thomas is an inhuman monster with no regard for any decency. Initech Jun 2022 #46

at least he'd dissent there treestar Jun 2022 #53

Rt💕🤷‍♂️TY & Sam jackson! Cha Jun 2022 #56