Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)America Needs to See the Reality of Assault Rifle Murders [View all]
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/mitchell-zimmerman/101823/america-needs-to-see-the-reality-of-assault-rifle-murdersAmerica Needs to See the Reality of Assault Rifle Murders
by Mitchell Zimmerman | June 3, 2022 - 5:46am
from OtherWords
snip//
The families of the Uvalde victims will make their own painful decisions regarding the remains of their children. They owe us nothing it is we who owe them our shamed apologies for failing to protect their children from the now well-known danger of mass murder.
No one can demand the right to use photographs of the victims.
But children arent the only ones whose bodies have been torn apart and rendered unrecognizable by modern assault weapons. Photographs from both wartime and the home front can doubtless be found to illustrate the costs of so-called gun rights.
These disturbing images could ignite the public conscience. They could also be put before gun buyers themselves.
A number of states force women exercising their constitutional right to abortion to look at fetal sonograms before ending their pregnancy. What if states required anyone who wants to buy an assault rifle, or other semi-automatic weapon, to first see photos or films that show what such weapons do to human bodies?
Some buyers would no doubt harden their hearts and persuade themselves they must have a weapon of war to defend their homes from an attack by imaginary hordes or other fictitious threats or to overthrow a government so tyrannical as to consider regulating firearms.
But perhaps some would reconsider whether they really need this kind of weapon to hunt or engage in target shooting.
There is no Second Amendment right to protection from reality.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
54 replies, 4150 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (69)
ReplyReply to this post
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Agree. We are shown diseased lungs, livers, hearts and all sort of other bodily ills. Same thing.
CurtEastPoint
Jun 2022
#1
I am not looking...I can imagine perfectly well what it does...what next public executions?
Demsrule86
Jun 2022
#2
Maybe, but I bet many like me just wouldn't look. I grew up near Sandy Hook in Ridgefield
Demsrule86
Jun 2022
#38
When I was in service in the early sixties we were cut loose at noon on saturdays.
justhanginon
Jun 2022
#17
Most people aren't MTG or people who would love them, so let's stick with the majority
BannonsLiver
Jun 2022
#35
Agreed, without seeing what slaughtered children look like, gun death becomes a sanitized news item.
housecat
Jun 2022
#21
Not sure why they wouldn't be used other then the common calibers are a little weak
EX500rider
Jun 2022
#48
If people want to know, they can easily find out. If they don't, they wont allow it to be crammed
Ferrets are Cool
Jun 2022
#29