General Discussion

orleans

(34,051 posts) Fri Sep 17, 2021, 12:20 PM Sep 2021

162

tiedrich in the morning (on merrick garland) [View all]

Link to tweet

raise your hand if you'd like to see Merrick Garland testify under oath in front of Congress on live television for 11 straight hours to explain why the fuck he hasn't indicted Trump or any of his guilty-as-fuck criminal henchmen yet

95 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

tiedrich in the morning (on merrick garland) [View all] orleans Sep 2021 OP

No. Since you are a legal scholar, experienced agent, or skilled prosecutor, you've offered your Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2021 #1

Feel better now? Orrex Sep 2021 #62

I said no such things and you can't twist it into that. It is a big set of cases Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2021 #66

+1,000,000 wnylib Sep 2021 #74

You mocked the OP in order to show how clever you think you are Orrex Sep 2021 #87

You are assuming my target was the OP. It was Tiedrich. Sorry to have confused you. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2021 #88

So unqualified people should run the legal system treestar Sep 2021 #69

When a subject line starts with "So," what follows can be ignored Orrex Sep 2021 #86

I can't keep track of the sarcasm today! treestar Sep 2021 #89

2 hands down KS Toronado Sep 2021 #2

I hope you are right Bettie Sep 2021 #7

I'm with you, Bettie. Paladin Sep 2021 #24

W and Cheney didn't Bettie Sep 2021 #26

Nixon didn't. TFG didn't on the Russian interference in the 2016 election. Scrivener7 Sep 2021 #43

Why not ask a prosecutor? StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #42

Excellent advice, but I doubt that wnylib Sep 2021 #75

My thoughts exactly! KS Toronado Sep 2021 #79

It can take quite a long time. Caliman73 Sep 2021 #45

+1. Facts and experience. Fancy that! . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2021 #67

I had a similar experience regarding a child wnylib Sep 2021 #76

totally agree with you. RicROC Sep 2021 #78

there is millions of in this shit ! I'd like to see if one person could read all of it ? monkeyman1 Sep 2021 #29

Me! blueinredohio Sep 2021 #3

I'm pretty sure agingdem Sep 2021 #4

agreed ! monkeyman1 Sep 2021 #30

THIS! Geechie Sep 2021 #58

Which is more likely? Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2021 #5

I'll go with "F" for 300 Alex. 45 exposed the underpinnings and lack of real guardrails. Evolve Dammit Sep 2021 #6

Your choice F equals Obama and Biden are incompetent or worse. You stand by that? Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2021 #8

The '08 meltdown- no meaningful accountability. Iraq invasion- no accountability. Gitmo still open Evolve Dammit Sep 2021 #28

You double down. Are Biden, Garland & Obama incompetent or are they worse? Which is it? Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2021 #33

Time will tell and historians will write about it. Obviously we are better with Dems in charge. Evolve Dammit Sep 2021 #38

Excellent answer StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #10

I agree. soldierant Sep 2021 #35

I am and have always been a C. ShazzieB Sep 2021 #57

I'm gonna go with "C" there Professor. sarchasm Sep 2021 #16

I love Jeff Tiedrich StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #9

Agreed. I think that people have their moments and limits. Caliman73 Sep 2021 #48

Agree StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #50

Oh man, don't get me started on 24/7 media and social media... Caliman73 Sep 2021 #55

Nope. We're not Republicans & we shouldn't want to be like them. CaptainTruth Sep 2021 #11

I am so with you on everything you said. StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #12

I am right there with you and Captain Truth, StarfishSaver! ShazzieB Sep 2021 #59

Gracious. What a pant load. No one is talking about unsubstantiated charges brought out of Scrivener7 Sep 2021 #41

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2021 #63

I'm with Tiedrich on this one. Bobstandard Sep 2021 #13

DOJ is not talking about ANY investigations they're conducting or ANY pending indictment StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #17

Except, except Bobstandard Sep 2021 #27

Except, except StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #40

Even a parking ticket would be a small sign tavernier Sep 2021 #68

Merrick Garland has an outstanding legal mind NNadir Sep 2021 #14

In his nearly quarter century on the bench as a federal judge StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #18

I agree with his level of frustration that we have had no major actions against the conspirators or Ford_Prefect Sep 2021 #15

You have laid out several reasons why these cases must be meticulously prepared StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #19

How about as a gesture of good faith we at least see some indictments come from Epstein's Gaugamela Sep 2021 #20

You'd think. Scrivener7 Sep 2021 #37

"seems like" treestar Sep 2021 #70

What media reports? All I hear is crickets. Nt. Gaugamela Sep 2021 #73

Some folk have told us they saw it all in real time on tv StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #81

What seems like a "slam dunk" case usually isn't treestar Sep 2021 #90

I'm not a lawyer, but it's hard for me to believe that there is nothing in Jeffrey Epstein's videos, Gaugamela Sep 2021 #91

I am a lawyer and had a case in Chancery Court in Delaware treestar Sep 2021 #92

Ok, thanks! Then I defer to your judgment on this. Nt. Gaugamela Sep 2021 #93

Going after Trump would make him more of a victim in the eyes of his followers right now. sop Sep 2021 #21

I understand both sides of the argument raging here, but I will say ... Hugh_Lebowski Sep 2021 #22

I'm, unfortunately, happy feet Sep 2021 #34

Tiedrich is dreaming an HRC whataboutism revenge fantasy sarchasm Sep 2021 #23

Which supports Tiedeich's point Bobstandard Sep 2021 #32

Tiedrich deleted his tweet StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #60

There's a lot of frustration right now... BlueIdaho Sep 2021 #25

Hand raised here. lagomorph777 Sep 2021 #31

I'd like to see any evidence that they are moving on this. I don't need the TFG indictment first. Scrivener7 Sep 2021 #36

Can you point to any evidence That DOJ is moving on any other criminal investigation? StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #44

So it's your contention that the DOJ never charged a low level person on the outer fringes Scrivener7 Sep 2021 #47

You know that's noty contention StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #49

No, really, it was you avoiding the point. I said I want to see some movement. Like a low level Scrivener7 Sep 2021 #51

I suspect Garland is the WRONG AG Tiger8 Sep 2021 #39

Lots of posts here are exactly the same as the ones we posted about the Mueller investigation. Scrivener7 Sep 2021 #46

Lots of them are also just like the ones some of y'all posted StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #52

Really, Starfish? OK. Scrivener7 Sep 2021 #53

Yes. Really. StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #54

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2021 #65

There were plenty of them - actually more than plenty. That argument was all the rage around here StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #77

StarfishSaver Nittersing Sep 2021 #83

Thank you StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #84

Good point!!! BigmanPigman Sep 2021 #61

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2021 #64

I think Tiedrich deleted the tweet StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #56

I just saw this OP. Didn't see the tweet, but the distrust Hortensis Sep 2021 #71

What would any other AG be doing differentlY? kentuck Sep 2021 #72

I think Sally Yates would be doing the same thing StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #82

Bookmarking this thread for a 2023 revisit. Duncan Grant Sep 2021 #80

Completely different OP subject, but there was an OP on the Delta variant Celerity Sep 2021 #94

So very true -- and familiar. Duncan Grant Sep 2021 #95

I'm old as dirt and still waiting to see justice for countless former officials msfiddlestix Sep 2021 #85