Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
22. Most reporters don't get paid much
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:27 PM
Sep 2012

that is the reality.

That includes AP and Reuters by the by.

Moreover, those shooting for National Geographic also shoot a LOT... you do not get good shots of something waiting for the moment. You need to shoot, A LOT.

Fair question, I shoot an average of 200 for a news story, just because I am not doing sports photography. How many do you think a photographer shoots at your average NBA game? (2000 is not unheard off)

Regardless, I just pointed to you an advantage of digital

I will point to you two more.

What do you think is 35 mm equivalent in digital? That be 6.2 megapixels. Why, if you have a descent, even point and shoot, with a fairly fast sensor, you too can play this game. Why photos are far less pixelated than they used to be...my Nikon, not even top of the line, no longer has pixelation issues, unless shooting at night, with high ISO during a wildfire.

There are shots I could not do with film, period.

Now film has it's advantages too... and large format is still used by top rated studio artists.

And yes, I learned to shoot Black and White and a dark room... and we do not even own a copy of Photoshop.



Ritz Camera is going out of business [View all] Kindly Refrain Sep 2012 OP
Well, that and the fact film photography is mostly a thing of the past. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2012 #1
They pretty muched stopped selling film a while ago. Kindly Refrain Sep 2012 #4
Then it make sense. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2012 #12
Plus, film puts a lot of people to work Kindly Refrain Sep 2012 #14
Too bad NV Whino Sep 2012 #2
Hey, they survived Blockbuster. Barack_America Sep 2012 #3
the whole company or just your local store? nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #5
The whole company Kindly Refrain Sep 2012 #7
I hate to say it nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #10
The good stuff was only 15% off Kindly Refrain Sep 2012 #15
Yeah but that is the tax and a little more nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #17
same with the Wolfe Cameras around here Skittles Sep 2012 #6
I noticed that, too derby378 Sep 2012 #24
I believe Wolfe and Ritz were the same company... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #30
I used to order equipment from their NYC store. MineralMan Sep 2012 #8
Saw the writing on the wall here a couple of months ago Proud Public Servant Sep 2012 #9
Website says reopening under new management Nov. 1st - lynne Sep 2012 #11
Yeah, no more Kodachrome either RoccoR5955 Sep 2012 #13
Well...would you go back to chemical photography? Taverner Sep 2012 #16
I do all sorts of chemical photography... hunter Sep 2012 #25
Tell me, as a journalist nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #18
That depends on who you shoot for RoccoR5955 Sep 2012 #21
Most reporters don't get paid much nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #22
Quite true. The only thing you forgot was RoccoR5955 Sep 2012 #23
True, very true burrowowl Oct 2012 #33
this about the internet not walmart.... TeamPooka Sep 2012 #19
Tourist rip off place, won't be missed DainBramaged Sep 2012 #20
"Ritz Camera Liquidation Approved After Second Bankruptcy" kwassa Sep 2012 #26
Well, most photographers are going out of business too. robinlynne Sep 2012 #27
it seems like everyone is a photographer these days JI7 Oct 2012 #32
I was a photogrpaher for 38 years. looking to retrain into a new field. jobless. robinlynne Oct 2012 #35
The name evokes a time long gone. Like "Fotomat." MADem Sep 2012 #28
Ah, good ol' Fotomat jsr Sep 2012 #29
Those are both cool and creative~! nt MADem Oct 2012 #31
They had a better printer than I do OriginalGeek Oct 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ritz Camera is going out ...»Reply #22