Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jxla

(201 posts)
37. After the Senate votes to acquit
Sat Dec 14, 2019, 05:22 AM
Dec 2019

Last edited Sat Dec 14, 2019, 11:06 PM - Edit history (1)

Your post #11 reminded me that MoveOn.org originated in 1998, after the group's founders began a petition urging the Republican-controlled Congress to "censure President Clinton and move on"

Is there any reason why the House couldn't vote to censure Trump after the Senate fails to remove him?

When this session Timewas Dec 2019 #1
"Session" lasts until the 116th congress ends (Jan 3, 2021) for these purposes. scheming daemons Dec 2019 #4
Impeachment resolutions don't expire with adjournment. NYC Liberal Dec 2019 #13
Not sure Timewas Dec 2019 #33
I like this idea, the Senate would be a sham. Of course, GOPers will say House Impeachment Hoyt Dec 2019 #2
Many people have had this opinuon. BigmanPigman Dec 2019 #3
This is what John Dean leftieNanner Dec 2019 #15
I love seeing him squirm. BigmanPigman Dec 2019 #23
I like that idea. The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2019 #5
Impeachment rso Dec 2019 #6
This is sort of interesting... it would drive Trump NUTS to be impeached w/o the possibility RockRaven Dec 2019 #7
Impeachment rso Dec 2019 #8
The only way to do that is to delay the floor vote... Wounded Bear Dec 2019 #9
Right -- the Senate has the sole power to try the impeachment. But can the House pnwmom Dec 2019 #10
As I noted above leftieNanner Dec 2019 #16
Thanks! n/t pnwmom Dec 2019 #19
Impeach him, send it to the Senate... VarryOn Dec 2019 #11
But why give them the chance to say he was acquitted? If we don't send it to the Senate, pnwmom Dec 2019 #12
I'd be for that if... VarryOn Dec 2019 #14
If this is constitutional, I don't think it would take much time at all. pnwmom Dec 2019 #17
I get what you're suggesting... VarryOn Dec 2019 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author jxla Dec 2019 #36
After the Senate votes to acquit jxla Dec 2019 #37
to be honest evertonfc Dec 2019 #18
Or wait for the Supreme Court to resolve some cases. C_U_L8R Dec 2019 #20
Let the people decide! Elect a new Senate next year so THEY preside over the case. Beartracks Dec 2019 #22
This should be a no brainer. world wide wally Dec 2019 #24
Bookmarking OldRed2450 Dec 2019 #25
If a delay in transmitting the approved Articles to the Senate is permissible DonaldsRump Dec 2019 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author DonaldsRump Dec 2019 #27
I think this is an excellent idea. And they can add charges when they get 45's Maraya1969 Dec 2019 #28
Post removed Post removed Dec 2019 #29
And everyone else is embarrassed by Trump ck4829 Dec 2019 #31
The Constitution isn't specific on process NotASurfer Dec 2019 #30
Tribe is special. Wawannabe Dec 2019 #32
I want Collins, Gardner and McSally on the record. RandySF Dec 2019 #34
At the very least, hold off on handing it to the Senate until fair rules are established LiberalLovinLug Dec 2019 #35
An interesting idea. Any mechanism that forces a house passed bill or articles that sends it to the beachbumbob Dec 2019 #38
Spread it out Stargazer09 Dec 2019 #39
Nancy would have good reason not to send it over if she so chose... kentuck Dec 2019 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What if, after the House ...»Reply #37