Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
Sat Jul 27, 2019, 02:41 PM Jul 2019

Epstein case: judge agrees to keep documents on 2008 plea deal secret [View all]





https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jul/27/jeffrey-epstein-2008-documents-secret
A judge in New York has granted a request from prosecutors to keep secret documents relating to Jeffrey Epstein’s controversial 2008 sexual abuse plea deal, on the grounds that the materials could hamper their investigation of others in the financier’s milieu.

The documents, which will be shared with Epstein’s attorneys, are believed to concern not only the deal itself, which allowed Epstein to plead guilty to low-level state solicitation charges, but also a clause that granted immunity to any and all potential co-conspirators and named four women suspected of facilitating or participating in alleged crimes against minors.

The documents may also shed light on the 2008 deal, which was kept secret from accusers for nearly a year in what some claim was a violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Controversy over the deal forced the resignation earlier this month of the US labor secretary, Alex Acosta, who was US attorney in Miami at the time.

In a court filing, prosecutors with the southern district of New York argued that the materials could “affect the privacy and confidentiality of individuals … [and that] would impede, if prematurely disclosed, the government’s ongoing investigation of uncharged individuals”.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Almost screamed out loud, then kept reading: Leghorn21 Jul 2019 #1
No, SDNY is compromised by Barr uponit7771 Jul 2019 #4
Leghorn, you read my mind. Haggis for Breakfast Jul 2019 #12
Rec'd for exposure. n/t PoliticAverse Jul 2019 #2
This is a good thing. Pacifist Patriot Jul 2019 #3
No, SDNY is compromised by Barr uponit7771 Jul 2019 #5
If it was the state of NY.... Roland99 Jul 2019 #6
Okay, I thought Epstein was an only federal case uponit7771 Jul 2019 #7
No. I think You are correct leftieNanner Jul 2019 #8
1000% stuffmatters Jul 2019 #13
Uhmmm, is this the reason for the case? 58Sunliner Jul 2019 #9
The article mentions a wider investigation but I wonder if Barr will scuttle Roland99 Jul 2019 #10
Trump Again Possum Hunter1 Jul 2019 #11
Bingo!!!!!!! johnnyfins Jul 2019 #14
I was hoping it was in motion before Barr and an off-shoot of Mueller due to Cohen. 58Sunliner Jul 2019 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Epstein case: judge agree...