General Discussion

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)

59. We need a person that will stand with ALL OTHER Democrats.

Reply to oberliner (Original post)

Mon Oct 15, 2018, 09:07 AM

Oct 2018

Last edited Mon Oct 15, 2018, 09:53 AM - Edit history (1)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

361 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kirsten Gillibrand for president [View all] oberliner Oct 2018 OP

Yea, ok, maybe make Al Franken her Veep. Geez. Funtatlaguy Oct 2018 #1

+1 blue cat Oct 2018 #52

Somehow I don't see that happening oberliner Oct 2018 #56

I'd rather see Al Fraken as president trueblue2007 Oct 2018 #257

We will see Sherman A1 Oct 2018 #2

She drove Al Franken out of the Senate The Blue Flower Oct 2018 #3

I'll have to read up on Jay Inslee oberliner Oct 2018 #54

She and 38 other Senators Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #60

Just the fact that you use the word "agreed" shows that you know he was pressured. Demit Oct 2018 #77

Yes there was a lot of behind the scenes pressure Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #89

I happen to know you're correct DFW Oct 2018 #101

Good post. Gillibrand fell for the repug scam and shoved Al under the bus. brush Oct 2018 #109

I think she saw it as a feather in her cap. She probably didn't expect it to backfire on her. Demit Oct 2018 #139

She and 38 other Senators Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #146

It's not sticking to them. You'll be compelled to bring that up repeatedly and it won't make a dent Demit Oct 2018 #160

Perception vs. Reality Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #165

The reality is that this was Gillibrand's baby. Demit Oct 2018 #174

Actually what you posted disputes Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #186

I don't think so. Demit Oct 2018 #212

But your link doesn't state that Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #218

Did you try actually reading it? LakeSuperiorView Oct 2018 #270

And as I stated before Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #292

All you have to this point is your opinion... LakeSuperiorView Oct 2018 #314

No she wasn't Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #315

Thank you for proving my point. She was very vocal on Dec. 6th. LakeSuperiorView Oct 2018 #324

No You said Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #329

Where's your proof that he agreed to resign on the 5th? LakeSuperiorView Oct 2018 #332

Because that was the point of the press conference Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #334

So you have no proof that he agreed to resign on the 5th. LakeSuperiorView Oct 2018 #335

What do you think the purpose of the press conference was? Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #340

And what is the date of the Tweet? Dec 6th. LakeSuperiorView Oct 2018 #341

The press conference was already scheduled on the 6th Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #342

Like it or not, Gillibrand was seen as leading the group. LakeSuperiorView Oct 2018 #343

Seen as Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #344

Most i would not want to be pres... lame54 Oct 2018 #353

That is fair. Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #354

Warren, Sanders and Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #142

16 women Senators coordinated together. tammywammy Oct 2018 #285

Good post, thank you. mountain grammy Oct 2018 #147

Thank you for the post. I felt like this was a total right wing set-up to get rid of Franken. Bluepinky Oct 2018 #168

Thank you DFW. 100%. Lots of us called and wrote to Mazie mahina Oct 2018 #223

I only met Mazie once DFW Oct 2018 #242

This is what I always assumed to have happened behind the scenes. I have a friend who knew AL hlthe2b Oct 2018 #237

I don't know him as well as your friend does, but our mutual friend knows him better DFW Oct 2018 #244

Thank you for this post. Turin_C3PO Oct 2018 #241

Agreed. No Republican is palatable enough to warrant sitting out a presidential race DFW Oct 2018 #247

Gaslight much? Please stop spreading lies. LakeSuperiorView Oct 2018 #226

And 38 others senators called for it too Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #229

Changing the goalposts now? LakeSuperiorView Oct 2018 #240

Not changing anything Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #246

What part of a direct quote eludes you? LakeSuperiorView Oct 2018 #249

Doesn't prove anything. Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #252

It proves that your statement was a lie. LakeSuperiorView Oct 2018 #256

No it doesn't. Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #260

You can keep typing that until you're blue in the face but it won't matter BannonsLiver Oct 2018 #250

Truth should matter Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #253

I'll support her if she prevails Jarqui Oct 2018 #110

I agree. nt LAS14 Oct 2018 #114

Ron Wyden ?? trueblue2007 Oct 2018 #258

Would we lose Minnesota or the principle of due process? delisen Oct 2018 #4

I don't think so oberliner Oct 2018 #51

I bet she wouldn't. MN Dems hate her guts for what she did to Franken. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #152

Is there a poll you are basing that on? oberliner Oct 2018 #195

I know a lot of Democrats. You can't even mention her name among them The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #207

Not in the primary. LakeSuperiorView Oct 2018 #245

Her part MyOwnPeace Oct 2018 #5

What about the rest of her senate career? oberliner Oct 2018 #49

I acknowledge the impressive MyOwnPeace Oct 2018 #126

I don't think that is a fair comparison oberliner Oct 2018 #197

In politics it often takes only one stupid move to overshadow a career. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #213

No, thanks. Kamala Harris , please. octoberlib Oct 2018 #6

I second that. Vinca Oct 2018 #7

Kamala Harris yes. She's shown the critical judgement we need. hlthe2b Oct 2018 #11

Oh, I love Kamala lovemydogs Oct 2018 #143

Gillibrand or Booker are much better choices. Amishman Oct 2018 #38

Gillibrand won't win , period. Not impressed with octoberlib Oct 2018 #69

She won't get a lot of Dem votes even. She handled the Franken issue very very poorly hlthe2b Oct 2018 #148

HRC ran a positive upbeat campaign. And in 2008 she had some pretty strong oratory. StevieM Oct 2018 #308

How about a Harris-Gillibrand ticket? oberliner Oct 2018 #47

Please Make the Case erpowers Oct 2018 #107

YES!YES!YES! ZZenith Oct 2018 #303

no steventh Oct 2018 #8

Why not? oberliner Oct 2018 #46

baggage is why not steventh Oct 2018 #125

People said similar things about HRC oberliner Oct 2018 #200

a good dem Kurt V. Oct 2018 #9

Agreed oberliner Oct 2018 #45

You know full well just divisive this is, but you decided to go ahead anyway. OnDoutside Oct 2018 #10

Indeed. hlthe2b Oct 2018 #12

Oh, come on. It's only divisive if we say EffieBlack Oct 2018 #39

What could possibly be divisive about praising a prominent Democratic senator? oberliner Oct 2018 #43

There you go again. OnDoutside Oct 2018 #61

Can you clarify what you mean by that? oberliner Oct 2018 #201

Here's my discussion contribution. She turns me off since what she pulled on Al. sprinkleeninow Oct 2018 #284

If you can't figure out why she's divisive I'll spell it out... brush Oct 2018 #111

When do two sides of an idea rate "divisive???" This is nuts. DU is a discussion website. nt LAS14 Oct 2018 #117

Huh? Do I have to remind you of the 2016 campaign? brush Oct 2018 #124

Do you mean the Hillary Sanders split? So.... LAS14 Oct 2018 #159

Yeah, until after Nov. 6th. Not rocket science. brush Oct 2018 #162

That's not really a fair characterization, in my view oberliner Oct 2018 #206

What??? This is supposed to be a DISCUSSION forum. (Not yelling, just.... LAS14 Oct 2018 #116

And in the 3 hours since I posted, how has the thread gone ? OnDoutside Oct 2018 #119

I'm not sure of your point. If you think it's... LAS14 Oct 2018 #122

No. The majority here are (as I expected), negative towards Gillibrand because of what she did to OnDoutside Oct 2018 #133

So we shouldn't post ideas if they are minority ideas??? LAS14 Oct 2018 #150

As I said in my earlier post, the OP knew what they were OnDoutside Oct 2018 #225

She is likely to be the nominee Renew Deal Oct 2018 #13

Agreed oberliner Oct 2018 #41

She does have a good record. Turin_C3PO Oct 2018 #243

NO way...I'd bet money other prominent Senators (Harris, Booker, Klobuchar, Warren etc) get support hlthe2b Oct 2018 #180

I don't think any one of them are a good bet at this point Renew Deal Oct 2018 #215

Not likely. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #211

What makes her likely? BlueStater Oct 2018 #360

Please stop. Demsrule86 Oct 2018 #14

She is a great Democratic senator and would make a great presidential candidate oberliner Oct 2018 #40

Because DU is a place for DISCUSSION. (Underlining, not yelling.) nt LAS14 Oct 2018 #118

Exactly. She is my last choice Horse with no Name Oct 2018 #209

No Chance Mojo2 Oct 2018 #15

Do you have anyone in particular you are hoping will run? oberliner Oct 2018 #35

So would none of the 38 other Senators get your vote? Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #63

NO!!! lunamagica Oct 2018 #16

Why not? oberliner Oct 2018 #34

For backstabbing Franken and the Clintons lunamagica Oct 2018 #232

NO! Tavarious Jackson Oct 2018 #17

Kamala Harris would also be a great choice oberliner Oct 2018 #33

How about Kamala Harris? people Oct 2018 #153

...of the "Railroad Our Own" club. TheCowsCameHome Oct 2018 #18

She has a lot going for her as a potentially strong Democratic candidate for president oberliner Oct 2018 #32

You told us anyone who though Roy Moore would lose Alabama was delusional. LanternWaste Oct 2018 #19

Sure am glad I got that prediction wrong oberliner Oct 2018 #31

That would be a no for me. Little Star Oct 2018 #20

Why not? oberliner Oct 2018 #27

SSDD. FSogol Oct 2018 #21

What's the problem? oberliner Oct 2018 #26

LOL betsuni Oct 2018 #22

What's so funny? oberliner Oct 2018 #25

No thanks! Nt USALiberal Oct 2018 #23

Why not? oberliner Oct 2018 #24

No, Boo EffieBlack Oct 2018 #28

Zero chance. InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2018 #29

No. Did i say no yet? Can i say no? I've forgotten my manners dem4decades Oct 2018 #30

This LACK OF CIVILITY - horrid, simply HORRID!! hatrack Oct 2018 #36

I could support her. nt LexVegas Oct 2018 #37

No. And she doesn't want to run now. djg21 Oct 2018 #42

3 weeks before midterms you post a knowingly divisive thread blm Oct 2018 #44

Also a diversion from the great Sen. Warren news. Kingofalldems Oct 2018 #55

Please check out my post on the great Sen. Warren news oberliner Oct 2018 #282

How is this divisive? Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #64

Method of Operation blm Oct 2018 #70

Which means? Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #74

Ahhhh...try three weeks before the critical mid-terms? That's why it's divisive. brush Oct 2018 #113

Again there are similar posts Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #123

Simple. There's plenty of time for this after Nov. 6. Focus on GOTV. brush Oct 2018 #128

So you would call similar posts Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #137

I clearly said "I don't care what candidate you favor". brush Oct 2018 #141

Nice diversion Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #145

Oh please. Your question wasn't necessary since I clearly stated... brush Oct 2018 #149

So yes or no Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #151

You sound surprised. tavernier Oct 2018 #73

Heh blm Oct 2018 #75

There is nothing divisive and lots of DUers have posted threads about potential nominees oberliner Oct 2018 #278

SSDD Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2018 #48

No thanks. I have stated why often enough. rzemanfl Oct 2018 #50

I would rather have Warren/Harris. Autumn Oct 2018 #53

She's OK, but has some weak spots. I'm uncommitted to any candidate for the Democratic primary race aikoaiko Oct 2018 #57

Unfortunately Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #58

We need a person that will stand with ALL OTHER Democrats. democratisphere Oct 2018 #59

Well, she stood with the entire Democratic Senate caucus... brooklynite Oct 2018 #67

Yes. That ONE and ALL OTHERS. democratisphere Oct 2018 #86

So in the context of the OP, all Senate Dems are unqualified as Presidential candidates... brooklynite Oct 2018 #93

Joe who?! democratisphere Oct 2018 #99

Perhaps it is time for a fresh horse. democratisphere Oct 2018 #104

Waiting for your knowing someones whole staff post. Nt USALiberal Oct 2018 #105

She wouldn't be my choice in a primary Bettie Oct 2018 #62

Nope. PubliusEnigma Oct 2018 #65

Joe Biden 2020 ! stonecutter357 Oct 2018 #66

So far my choice, tavernier Oct 2018 #76

From what I've seen of her I think she'd be eaten alive in the Democratic primary debates. Gidney N Cloyd Oct 2018 #68

Nope..Forget her...she threw Al Franken under the bus..nt helpisontheway Oct 2018 #71

Answer: no. Reason: Much like Sec. Clinton, she is divisive and thus damaged goods drbtg1 Oct 2018 #72

Can you give examples of this divisiveness ... JHan Oct 2018 #78

This would be like giving a description of the ocean... drbtg1 Oct 2018 #84

I didn't agree with her completely re Clinton but she is not the only liberal.. JHan Oct 2018 #90

Her being the ringleader though highlights her poor judgment in so quickly falling... brush Oct 2018 #121

If she was a ringleader, her colleagues were happy to be led. JHan Oct 2018 #129

She forced it though. She damaged her own chances. brush Oct 2018 #132

still I can't separate her from her colleagues over this, JHan Oct 2018 #140

True enough, but she placed herself out front. There are consequences for poor judgment. brush Oct 2018 #144

Well I think that's unfair to her. This is what I think happened... JHan Oct 2018 #155

Yeah, but she jumped on the bandwagon way before Shumer or any of the others. brush Oct 2018 #158

yes ..that's something she can't erase. JHan Oct 2018 #166

Consensual is the keyword. They both were willing (she even flashed her thong at him). brush Oct 2018 #196

Monica Lewinsky wrote an interesting piece for Vanity Fair last year. lapucelle Oct 2018 #351

that's true.. "damaged goods" is particularly sexist. JHan Oct 2018 #357

No that's not how things work. Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #192

You nailed it nt Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #189

"Sexual harassment awareness"? Funny, because I don't remember any Gillibrand amendment,... drbtg1 Oct 2018 #154

Look, my only point to you is you cannot single her out for a collective choice that was made.. JHan Oct 2018 #156

Yes, actually, I can single her out for being the ringleader. drbtg1 Oct 2018 #163

So Senator Gillibrand cowed Schumer and others? JHan Oct 2018 #164

LMFAO!!!!! drbtg1 Oct 2018 #175

It's a message board, people respond to posts whenever and wherever. JHan Oct 2018 #181

Schumer was the ringleader Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #194

The women senators coordinated their response. tammywammy Oct 2018 #345

"Once again, she's damaged goods"... lapucelle Oct 2018 #352

Oh, hell, no! drbtg1 Oct 2018 #358

Adding an exclamation point at the end of a superficial assertion lapucelle Oct 2018 #359

What proof do you have that Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #176

Provide your own links. I don't work for you. Everyone knows she lead the charge so... brush Oct 2018 #188

No. You are making an accusation Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #199

Get lost. brush Oct 2018 #204

So you can't support Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #321

+1 OnDoutside Oct 2018 #228

She and 38 other Senators Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #234

The others were marking her, she was the first to stick the knife in. Quite Shakespearean in fact. OnDoutside Oct 2018 #295

She doesn't have that much power or influence Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #298

She doesn't have that much power or influence now. OnDoutside Oct 2018 #299

And she didn't then either. Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #301

Your efforts to rewrite history doesn't wash, she led the demand for his resignation. And that was OnDoutside Oct 2018 #305

No that is not what happened Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #309

No, they are 2020 rivals, who marked her move. OnDoutside Oct 2018 #310

Any proof of that Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #311

The senators coordinated together. tammywammy Oct 2018 #287

But it is easier to just blame one Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #312

Your comment is a joke Renew Deal Oct 2018 #361

Can't get behind her. lark Oct 2018 #79

Post removed Post removed Oct 2018 #157

True, I pity the good Dems running against her. lark Oct 2018 #227

her record is solid, I don't really have issues with her. JHan Oct 2018 #80

Can't get past Al Franken. Sorry, she's not my candidate. n/t Miles Archer Oct 2018 #81

So you rather have another 4 years of Trump? Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #92

You're asking that because she is our one and only option? Miles Archer Oct 2018 #100

So then, if it is Trump vs. Gillibrand in the general Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #108

Oh, stop. Was that supposed to be some kind of gotcha? Squinch Oct 2018 #130

Just asking a question Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #135

And implying that if someone doesn't like a candidate they must be trumpers. Squinch Oct 2018 #136

Not implying anything Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #138

She Turned on the Clintons, Who Did Much to Help Her, as well as Turned on Franken dlk Oct 2018 #82

I'd only vote for her if she somehow got the nomination. BlueTsunami2018 Oct 2018 #83

I would vote against her in the primary first. dhol82 Oct 2018 #202

She lead the charge that cost us a wonderful and irreplaceable voice. mahina Oct 2018 #85

Due process is a talking point Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #96

no ebbie15644 Oct 2018 #87

Nope workinclasszero Oct 2018 #88

NOOOOOOOOOO! nt elfin Oct 2018 #91

Solid progressive, smart, strong fighter. WeekiWater Oct 2018 #94

My thoughts exactly oberliner Oct 2018 #191

11/06/2018. Nothing else exists. n/t Greybnk48 Oct 2018 #95

Fair enough oberliner Oct 2018 #190

The best Dem nominee for president in 2020 MontanaMama Oct 2018 #97

Good points oberliner Oct 2018 #187

Did anyone else hear goats galloping on the bridge? Drahthaardogs Oct 2018 #98

On the record I had as a child like 66 years ago, they went clip-clop. n/t rzemanfl Oct 2018 #106

Can you clarify what you mean by that? oberliner Oct 2018 #185

No. I can't clarify. Drahthaardogs Oct 2018 #273

Kirsten gillibrand.... quickesst Oct 2018 #102

Who would you like to see as our nominee? oberliner Oct 2018 #184

As of right now, and if Hillary does not run.... quickesst Oct 2018 #336

He is definitely a popular choice oberliner Oct 2018 #339

He certainly hits all the attributes.... quickesst Oct 2018 #350

Nope SHRED Oct 2018 #103

In what way do you find her to be divisive? oberliner Oct 2018 #183

Just look at this thread SHRED Oct 2018 #216

No. n/t ms liberty Oct 2018 #112

Why not? oberliner Oct 2018 #182

I'll take "Who's that under the bridge?" for $100, Alex. Squinch Oct 2018 #115

Can you clarify what you mean by that comment? oberliner Oct 2018 #179

I don't think you need any clarification. But good try! Squinch Oct 2018 #224

Here's a different take on the Gillibrand/Franken thing. LAS14 Oct 2018 #120

I do agree that support for Kavanaugh was higher than expected oberliner Oct 2018 #178

But I continue to be shocked at the drift right on the part of indpendents. LAS14 Oct 2018 #210

No, and I'm sure she won't make it past the primary. MoonRiver Oct 2018 #127

Who do you think it will be? oberliner Oct 2018 #173

Not sure yet. There will be so many choices. MoonRiver Oct 2018 #203

Who else do you not want? oberliner Oct 2018 #208

I don't want Biden. MoonRiver Oct 2018 #214

Biden seems to be the most popular choice at this point oberliner Oct 2018 #323

I don't want people to cite Michael Harriot as a source one day LanternWaste Oct 2018 #235

I very much value your opinion oberliner Oct 2018 #322

im not feeling this.... samnsara Oct 2018 #131

Why not? oberliner Oct 2018 #172

You've made your point snowybirdie Oct 2018 #134

I don't understand your question oberliner Oct 2018 #171

It's called the first amendment. Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #198

The First Amendment applies only to the suppression of speech by the government. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #230

So it is OK with you that Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #233

I don't see anybody's speech being "suppressed" here. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #236

That is true for the most part. Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #248

Just making a point about a common mistake about the First Amendment. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #254

Well you made your point Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #262

That's how the law works. tazkcmo Oct 2018 #300

And if the rules of the site are not violated Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #302

Sure. Maybe it's a bit rude, but it doesn't suppress their speech The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #328

So do you support telling people to shut up Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #330

No, it's rude. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #331

Thanks Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #333

I'll vote for whoever gets the nomination, but we better be smarter than this. -nt CrispyQ Oct 2018 #161

Why do you not think it would be smart to nominate her? oberliner Oct 2018 #170

I would love to see a woman or minority at the top of the ticket, CrispyQ Oct 2018 #219

No. IluvPitties Oct 2018 #167

Why not? oberliner Oct 2018 #169

Going after Bill and Hillary, Al Franken... IluvPitties Oct 2018 #177

I'm with you on Klobuchar oberliner Oct 2018 #193

Fans of Al Franken have long memories and will not forgive or forget Gothmog Oct 2018 #205

I guess the RW think tanks are scrambling with this great Sen. Elizabeth Warren news. Kingofalldems Oct 2018 #217

Of course I would support her in the GE. Turin_C3PO Oct 2018 #220

Wow! Check out this breaking news: Kingofalldems Oct 2018 #221

No way in hell she was responsible for driving our best doc03 Oct 2018 #222

How was Franken the best Senator? Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #231

It ain't working. Kingofalldems Oct 2018 #239

What ain't working? Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #251

If she secures the nomination she has my unconditional support Devil Child Oct 2018 #238

NO! happy feet Oct 2018 #255

She and 38 other Senators Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #263

Posts like this are intended to be divisive Mr. Ected Oct 2018 #259

Are similar posts Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #264

Yes, but you're missing the point Mr. Ected Oct 2018 #268

Maybe the poster's goal is to support a particular Senator Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #269

Or maybe the poster wants to poke a hot stick in our eye Mr. Ected Oct 2018 #271

Or maybe the poster likes Kirsten Gillibrand and thinks she is a great progressive Democrat? oberliner Oct 2018 #274

How are they uplifting? Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #291

How do you know what the poster's intentions are? Veiled or not? nt LAS14 Oct 2018 #286

How.do you know what they are? Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #294

Sorry. I meant to reply to Mr. Ected, post 268. LAS14 Oct 2018 #304

No, they aren't oberliner Oct 2018 #275

Not a chance cp Oct 2018 #261

So Sanders and Warren were also collaborating? Trumpocalypse Oct 2018 #265

This LW1977 Oct 2018 #267

Um.. no. LW1977 Oct 2018 #266

No thank you. tazkcmo Oct 2018 #272

Who are your top five? oberliner Oct 2018 #281

No thank you. YOHABLO Oct 2018 #276

We can do better than this. jalan48 Oct 2018 #277

NOOOOOO!!! aeromanKC Oct 2018 #279

What does FTB stand for? oberliner Oct 2018 #280

Post removed Post removed Oct 2018 #283

Kristen pamdb Oct 2018 #288

No way. We don't need another northeastern liberal. Need someone from the middle the country. AND LBM20 Oct 2018 #289

HELL NO!!!!!!! sdfernando Oct 2018 #290

Absolutely not RhodeIslandOne Oct 2018 #293

This message was self-deleted by its author RhodeIslandOne Oct 2018 #296

How in the world can you "see" behind what the poster put in the post? LAS14 Oct 2018 #306

Post removed Post removed Oct 2018 #307

This message was self-deleted by its author oberliner Oct 2018 #319

Bazinga! George II Oct 2018 #320

Proud to advocate for Gillibrand, a great progressive Democratic senator oberliner Oct 2018 #318

Fuck that. Still In Wisconsin Oct 2018 #297

Why do you say that? oberliner Oct 2018 #317

fuck putin! stonecutter357 Oct 2018 #313

What does Putin have to do with Gillibrand? oberliner Oct 2018 #316

i think you get the picture . stonecutter357 Oct 2018 #337

I don't - can you explain why you mentioned Putin? oberliner Oct 2018 #338

LOL, 15 recs should be enough proof it is a bad idea! nt USALiberal Oct 2018 #325

I knew this was going to get interesting when I first saw it this morning underpants Oct 2018 #326

Could we get through 2018 first? nt dflprincess Oct 2018 #327

Fair enough oberliner Oct 2018 #346

Haven't seen her in Minnesota dflprincess Oct 2018 #347

She was recently in Pennsylvania oberliner Oct 2018 #348

I don't believe there have been any big names this year. dflprincess Oct 2018 #349

I will support her if she's our nominee. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2018 #355

Which we must all do. ooky Oct 2018 #356