Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Trump's retaliation against McCabe is abuse of power, and an impeachable offense. [View all]L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)9. THREADS: McCabe testifies Comey told him about Trump obstruction.
These are the threads the Trump bots are trying to push down page, and they are accomplishing it.
The main Twitter feed is dominated by Trumpian Fascist Media on this topic thanks to the bots.
Link to tweet
1/ In the story above, @mkraju of @CNN reports that McCabe told Congress that @Comey told him about his conversations with Trump shortly after they happened. Thats important because those conversations appear to be the centerpiece of Muellers obstruction investigation.
2/ Obstruction also appears to be Trumps greatest legal liability at this time, given what we know publicly, although whether a sitting President can be indicted is a hotly debated legal question that no one can definitively answer.
3/ But lets say that there was a trial concerning obstruction. Would Comeys statements to McCabe come into evidence? Probably, even though someones statements out of court (such as Comeys statements to McCabe) usually arent admissible as evidence.
4/ Although the general rule is that hearsay (statements made out of court) cant be testified to in court, there are many exceptions. One of those is for prior consistent statements.
5/ So if Comey testifies as to what Trump told him (which is proper because Trumps words can be used against him) and the defense team attacks Comeys credibility, Comeys prior statements to McCabe can be used to show that he didnt make up his testimony about what Trump said.
6/ If Trumps team didnt attack Comeys credibility at all, instead mounting a different kind of defense, McCabe couldnt testify about what Comey told him.
7/ As a practical matter, McCabes potential testimony would be very important in an obstruction trial of Trump. (Or anyone else, as long as they were a co-conspirator of Trump or there was another reason why Trumps words could be used.)
8/ It would be hard to defend an obstruction case while accepting all of Comeys testimony and making no attack on him. Although a jury would likely find Comey to be more credible than Trump, good cross-examination could create doubt, while letting him go unchallenged would hurt.
9/ That said, given that Comey briefed McCabe and other FBI leaders soon thereafter, their testimony backing up Comeys account could be devastating. The fact that Comey briefed his staff shortly afterward would put Trumps team in a tough spot at a trial.
10/ That could be one reason why Comey briefed them. He is savvy and spent a career in law enforcement, so when he saw conversations that were problematic, he wrote memos and told others to create a record that could be used later. Thats what FBI agents are trained to do. /end
Link to tweet
Jim Jordan says "everything that I've heard (from McCabe) reinforces what I believed before" about whether Clinton was treated favorably by FBI. Other Rs agree. But they declined to provide details of confidential interview
Comey told Senate Intel he briefed senior leadership about all his conversations with Trump soon after; McCabe confirmed he was one of those people
McCabe leaves the House grilling after 9 hours - this after an eight hour session with House Intel this week. Both sides see ammunition from his testimony
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/943995725825937408.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Trump's retaliation against McCabe is abuse of power, and an impeachable offense. [View all]
L. Coyote
Dec 2017
OP
Three FBI officials who corroborate Comey re Trump's loyalty pledge - ALL being *attacked*
L. Coyote
Dec 2017
#5
Andrew McCabe could be a key witness to Special Counsel Mueller's investigation
L. Coyote
Dec 2017
#7
They are currently trying to discredit Mueller with Strzok, McCabe, and Ohr narratives...
fallout87
Dec 2017
#40
Trump's Twitter feed is the gift that keeps on giving. Merry Christmas Robert Mueller.
L. Coyote
Dec 2017
#22
"When you're attacking FBI agents because you're under criminal investigation, you're losing"
L. Coyote
Dec 2017
#25
I said that Trump would do this. Destroy McCabe. Whoever leaked McCabe's plans...
Honeycombe8
Dec 2017
#34