Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

norge

norge's Journal
norge's Journal
May 1, 2013

No Kidding!

Really? "Every act of gun violence is committed with a gun." What a revelation! Gee, I thought some were committed by lawn mowers. Just like every criminal act is committed by a - criminal?

Yes, you can ban guns and ammunition and gun violence goes away - in theory, but not reality. Criminals will still have access to both - do you really think a ban will keep them out of their hands? A gun owned by a law-abiding citizen is not a danger to anyone. (Except perhaps to a criminal threatening that citizen.)

Are you only concerned with gun violence? What about non-gun related violence? FBI website (see Expanded Homicide Data Table 11, Murder Circumstances, By Weapon, 2011) shows in that year, U.S. murders committed by "Knives or cutting instruments" numbered 1,684. Same data table shows 496 people were murdered by "Blunt objects (clubs, hammers, etc.)". And another 726 people were murdered by "Personal weapons (hands, fists, feet, etc.)". Add in the other methods of murder used in 2011, (fire, strangulation, poison, drowning, etc.) and you get a total of 4,081 non-gun murders that year. Are these people's lives just as valuable as those murdered by guns? What is your take on stopping those murders? Ban all knives, baseball bats, fists, ropes, and so on? The causes of violence do NOT lie within the inanimate object used to commit the act. They lie within the human mind. So in response to your smug "end of story" line - you couldn't be more wrong. Violence will continue in many different forms until we address the mental health issues.

May 1, 2013

When You Have No Evidence To Refute An Argument...

try laughter! It implies that you think the points made by your opponent are so silly as to be laughable, and require no serious refutation. Of course, your laughter really means that you have no logical, rational opposition to offer.

May 1, 2013

An Appalling Lack of Civility Here

Scuba, why do you feel the need to be so hostile? Is no one allowed to believe in gun control, but think that requiring gun owners to carry liability insurance might be going too far? So that if someone agrees with your viewpoint in all but that single issue, you respond with "Take your NRA bullshit elsewhere". What a sad commentary on the idea that this could be a forum for a civilized discussion. With all due respect to your right to respond as you see fit, I must say that your response brings to mind the image of a right-wing religious fundamentalist preacher that tells his congregation "Believe and think and do exactly as I say, right down to the Nth degree, or you are condemned to Hell! I cast you out from this church!" Is this really the message you want to convey?

Profile Information

Member since: Tue Feb 19, 2013, 01:44 AM
Number of posts: 6

About norge

"I disagree with what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it."
Latest Discussions»norge's Journal