Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

markpkessinger

markpkessinger's Journal
markpkessinger's Journal
May 11, 2012

Having now had several months to watch the workings of DU3, can I just say...

KUDOS to Skinner and anyone else involved in the redesign! Despite doom & gloom predictions over the new jury system, based on my own jury experience and on watching the discussion boards generally, I think it has worked out extraordinarily well. There is still plenty of room for differing viewpoints, dissent, etc.

Bravo, Skinner!

May 11, 2012

Having now had several months to watch the workings of DU3, can I just say...

KUDOS to Skinner and anyone else involved in the redesign! Despite doom & gloom predictions over the new jury system, based on my own jury experience and on watching the discussion boards generally, I think it has worked out extraordinarily well. There is still plenty of room for differing viewpoints, dissent, etc.

Bravo, Skinner!

May 10, 2012

Glenn Greenwald: "The president deserves credit for his actions in this civil rights area"

I know there are some here who think Greenwald is the spawn of Satan, but he genuinely gives President Obama credit for his gay marriage stance, taking a more charitable view than even many folks here have taken. Well worth a read...


http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/e_3/singleton/

May 3, 2012

R.I.P. the administration's purported commitmet to "evidence-based" sex ed curricula

Once again, this administration sacrifice a statement of principle by the President in order to pander to a constituency that will never in a million years give this President a single vote, and in fact will do everything within its power to block every initiative and to make sure he is not re-elected. Who the hell is the political genius in the Administration who is making these kinds of calls?

[font size=4]He-Men and Virginity Pledges? Obama Administration Quietly Endorses Absurd Anti-Sex Curriculum[/font]
< . . . >
No notice, not even a press release to announce the addition of three programs to the coveted list of 28 deemed effective and carrying the HHS seal of approval. Until now, this list was the holy grail of the Administration’s commitment to a science-based approach to teen pregnancy prevention and a directive for grantees of the President’s Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative (TPPI).

So why the secrecy about the new additions? What does the Administration have to hide?

Because one of the "new" programs is actually an old, dis-proven and dangerous abstinence-only-until-marriage program.

We have been around long enough to expect politics as usual in Washington, D.C. The backroom deals and secrecy should not surprise us. The jettisoning of young people and their sexual health for political expediency is not new. But, this blatant hypocrisy needs to stop. This latest example is just too much.
< . . . >


Read full article at: http://www.alternet.org/sex/155228/he-men_and_virginity_pledges_obama_administration_quietly_endorses_absurd_anti-sex_curriculum/?page=entire
April 27, 2012

Speaking as a gay man, I don't think you can make a blanket statement like this....

What I think one can safely say is that homophobes are likely very conflicted about their own sexuality. Does that necessarily mean they are gay? No, but then again human sexuality runs along a spectrum, and is not the binary, black-and-white kind of thing many of us would like to think it is.

April 24, 2012

Some ideas/direction sought on a piece on privatization I'm working on...

I'm in the early stages of developing a blogpost I'm writing. The piece is intended to debunk, to the extent possible, the claims made by the right to the effect that private industry always delivers products/services more efficiently (i.e., at a better quality per price) than the government. One of the things I always try to do in pieces like this is to anticipate the counter-arguments and counter examples. And here's the point where I could use some ideas/direction pointers. Can anyone here, being as generous as you reasonably can to the right's argument, think of any example from U.S. history where a product/service that was originally a publicly provided and was later privatized, about which a remotely arguable case can be made that such privatization worked to the benefit of the public at large?

I'm not looking for folks to do my research for me here, but just for some examples I might use to anticipate the right's counter-argument. Any thoughts would be most appreciated.

Thanks in advance!

April 22, 2012

Raw Story: U.S. authorities crackdown on medical marijuana spots

The federal crackdown on state legalized medical marijuana facilities has grown to become a rising issue across the United States, as a new report from Al Jazeera documents.

California is an epicenter for the law enforcement crackdown despite being one of the dozen states to legalize medical marijuana, including a recent raid at Oaksterdam University in Oakland.

WATCH: Video from Al Jazeera, from April 21, 2012.


Video available at http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/04/21/u-s-authorities-crackdown-on-medical-cannabis/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29
April 13, 2012

Truthout: White House to Delay Implementation of Key Anti-Discrimination Order

Seems I will need a still larger clothespin for my nose when I cast my vote in November...

After months of dodging questions about the progress of an executive order prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in federal contracting, the White House won’t issue the directive, but will instead study whether gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender employees require employment protections, ThinkProgress has learned. The news comes after White House senior advisor Valerie Jarrett held a meeting with LGBT advocates to discuss the matter.

Existing studies suggest that 11 to 16 million additional employees would have gained protections as a result of the measure, since many “federal contractors do not currently have those policies, and they employ millions of workers.” Among them are Jarrod Scarbrough and Les Sewell, a gay couple who attended Monday’s Easter Egg Roll at the White House to ask Obama to sign the order. “Jarrod works for a company that the government contracts through, and we live in New Mexico — we’re actually protected, we don’t have to worry too much about being discriminated against. However, in June we’re moving to Florida where that protection, we’ll no longer have that,” Sewell explained during an appearance on MSNBC. “Without this administrative action, Jarrod could lose his job and then where would this family be?”

Equality advocates who had been working to advance the measure are asking similar questions. “Today’s news that the White House’s Council of Economic Advisors will launch a study to better understand workplace discrimination against gay and transgender Americans is confounding and disappointing,” said Winnie Stachelberg, the Executive Vice President for External Affairs at the Center for American Progress. “The President should use his executive authority to extend existing nondiscrimination requirements of federal contractors to include sexual orientation and gender identity,” she added.

Earlier this month, 72 Congressional lawmakers urged the administration to enact the order, noting that it would “extend important workplace protections to millions of Americans, while at the same time laying the groundwork for Congressional passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA).” Data show that “43 percent of LGB people and 90 percent of transgender people have experienced workplace discrimination” and that the overwhelming majority of Americans — 73 percent — would have supported a measure prohibiting it.


Read full article at http://truth-out.org/news/item/8493-white-house-to-delay-implementation-of-key-anti-discrimination-order
April 7, 2012

Refreshing ruling in a student drug testing case...

... from a school approximately 40 miles from my hometown:

[font size=5]No drug tests for student[/font]
[font size = 1]April 5, 2012
By MATT HUTCHINSON - mhutchinson@sungazette.com , Williamsport Sun-Gazette [/font]

A Loyalsock Township High School senior has won his right to participate in school activities once again.

Lycoming County Judge Richard A. Gray granted a preliminary injunction Wednesday against Loyalsock Township School District's drug testing policy that targets students involved with extracurricular activities and those who park their cars at school.

< . . . >

Brandon was banned from participating in school service clubs, a scholastic scrimmage team and National Honor Society recognition because he refused to sign papers consenting to random drug testing. He also was removed as junior class president because of his refusal.

< . . . >

In his ruling, Gray noted that a precedent was set with Theodore v. Delaware Valley School District (2003), where the state Supreme Court said that a random drug testing program will "pass constitutional scrutiny only if the district makes some actual showing of the specific need for the policy and an explanation of its basis for believing that the policy would address that need."

Read full article at: http://www.sungazette.com/page/content.detail/id/576637/No-drug-tests-for-student.html?nav=5011

Profile Information

Member since: Sat May 15, 2010, 04:48 PM
Number of posts: 8,401
Latest Discussions»markpkessinger's Journal