Bernie Campaign Ad - Betrayed (A look at potential GE messaging)

[HerbChestnut]

[NurseJackie]

1. Geeze...

As political commercials go... it's pretty bad. Amateurish. Pedestrian. Long. Boring. Trite. Predictable. Cliche. --- Did I mention: LONG? VERY long!

It's clearly geared toward those who already support Burnie. The only people who will listen to the entire thing are Burnie fans. Nobody's mind will be changed by this.

[HerbChestnut]

3. Tell us how you really feel, Jackie...

[NurseJackie]

4. I did, Herb.

I'm always honest.

[NurseJackie]

6. Hi, mysteryowl

[marble falls]

7. He got by the first one but the second one got him.

[George II]

8. A 3+ minute campaign ad, that's going to lose everyone's attention pretty quickly.

[HerbChestnut]

9. This probably won't show up on TV.

Looks like something for social media.

[NurseJackie]

11. Or maybe an insomnia sufferers' support website.

Looks like something for social media.

Or maybe an insomnia sufferers' support website. Ho-hum! Yawn!

[NurseJackie]

10. Snoozefest...

[NYMinute]

13. Not to mention...

banal, mundane, perfunctory, loquacious, supercilious, ordinary, sub-par etc. etc.

It is a sort of commercial that screams "change that damn channel now!"

[NurseJackie]

14. Amateurs. NRFPT.

[Uncle Joe]

2. Kicked and recommended.

Thanks for the thread HerbChestnut.

[Gothmog]

12. trump would destroy a weak candidate like sanders

In addition to the well written 101 page memorandum with oppo on sanders with a 1000 pages of backup from the Clinton campaign trump has his own oppo file on sanders that would destroy such a weak and divisive candidate like sanders. Trump had a two foot thick book of oppo research on Sanders http://www.newsweek.com/myths-cost-democrats-presidential-election-521044

They ignored the fact that Sanders had not yet faced a real campaign against him. Clinton was in the delicate position of dealing with a large portion of voters who treated Sanders more like the Messiah than just another candidate. She was playing the long game—attacking Sanders strongly enough to win, but gently enough to avoid alienating his supporters. Given her overwhelming support from communities of color—for example, about 70 percent of African-American voters cast their ballot for her—Clinton had a firewall that would be difficult for Sanders to breach....

So what would have happened when Sanders hit a real opponent, someone who did not care about alienating the young college voters in his base? I have seen the opposition book assembled by Republicans for Sanders, and it was brutal. The Republicans would have torn him apart. And while Sanders supporters might delude themselves into believing that they could have defended him against all of this, there is a name for politicians who play defense all the time: losers....

The Republicans had at least four other damning Sanders videos (I don’t know what they showed), and the opposition research folder was almost 2-feet thick. (The section calling him a communist with connections to Castro alone would have cost him Florida.) In other words, the belief that Sanders would have walked into the White House based on polls taken before anyone really attacked him is a delusion built on a scaffolding of political ignorance.

sanders was such a weak primary candidate that the Clinton campaign did not use its oppo but trump would have fun destroying such a weak candidate like sanders