Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Related: About this forum
Congratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
Warren takes on big fights for consumers and wins them. I saw it firsthand: Rich Cordray
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a testament to the strength of Warrens ideas and her ability to make them work. She has guts and skill.https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/01/23/elizabeth-warren-takes-on-big-fights-wins-richard-cordray-column/4524090002/
Over the past year, Sen. Elizabeth Warren has cemented her reputation as a thought leader on economic policy and as a champion of big ideas. But often missing from the public discussion is her track record of tackling key problems successfully and leading complex organizations. I saw this firsthand when I worked closely with her at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
After reckless lending by the big banks and Wall Street crashed our economy in 2008, Elizabeth stormed Washington with a bold idea: Create a new federal agency with the mission to root out fraud and abuse in the financial marketplace. She brought together a diverse coalition to press for action on Capitol Hill. She got the American people involved in the fight. And she fearlessly battled the special interests the powerful financial lobby who were unable to stop her.
In 2010, Congress passed her idea into law, and Elizabeth rolled up her sleeves to build the new consumer agency from scratch. She effectively navigated a complex and often adversarial federal system to get things done.
As we worked together to streamline disclosures that help people Know Before You Owe, I found that she focused on delivering tangible benefits for people rather than producing bureaucracy. She encouraged us to take on ambitious projects, set aggressive deadlines and test innovative approaches to persistent problems. She shrugged off personal attacks from special interests, administration foes and even members of Congress, so that everyone else could remain focused on the core mission.
Underestimated business acumen
Elizabeths managerial strengths were bolstered by her sophisticated understanding of markets and her nuanced approach to government intervention. She saw that the best way to protect people against corporate abuse is to prevent it altogether. She insisted on a robust approach to fair lending cases based on statistical evidence. They included both redlining cases (refusing to lend in certain communities of color) and reverse redlining cases (lending in such communities on worse terms than elsewhere).
...
After reckless lending by the big banks and Wall Street crashed our economy in 2008, Elizabeth stormed Washington with a bold idea: Create a new federal agency with the mission to root out fraud and abuse in the financial marketplace. She brought together a diverse coalition to press for action on Capitol Hill. She got the American people involved in the fight. And she fearlessly battled the special interests the powerful financial lobby who were unable to stop her.
In 2010, Congress passed her idea into law, and Elizabeth rolled up her sleeves to build the new consumer agency from scratch. She effectively navigated a complex and often adversarial federal system to get things done.
As we worked together to streamline disclosures that help people Know Before You Owe, I found that she focused on delivering tangible benefits for people rather than producing bureaucracy. She encouraged us to take on ambitious projects, set aggressive deadlines and test innovative approaches to persistent problems. She shrugged off personal attacks from special interests, administration foes and even members of Congress, so that everyone else could remain focused on the core mission.
Underestimated business acumen
Elizabeths managerial strengths were bolstered by her sophisticated understanding of markets and her nuanced approach to government intervention. She saw that the best way to protect people against corporate abuse is to prevent it altogether. She insisted on a robust approach to fair lending cases based on statistical evidence. They included both redlining cases (refusing to lend in certain communities of color) and reverse redlining cases (lending in such communities on worse terms than elsewhere).
...
***************
Much more at the link.
And yes, we badly NEED "guts and skill" in today's political climate.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 292 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warren takes on big fights for consumers and wins them. I saw it firsthand: Rich Cordray (Original Post)
BlueMTexpat
Jan 2020
OP
spooky3
(34,460 posts)1. I admire people who get things done
That need to be done. Nt
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
BeyondGeography
(39,375 posts)2. This shows you what a grown-up she is, too
Cordray got the director job after the Geithner faction weighed in against Warren. Lots of people in that situation throw a pity party for themselves and do whatever they can to make life difficult for their successor. Not EW, obviously.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided