Even AFTER the "apology" of last night, Gray is still going on about this:

[George II]

She was hired by Sanders. She works for Sanders. She is his National Press Secretary. Will he ever address this publicly?

Link to tweet

[JustAnotherGen]

1. She's full of shit

It was a freeze on Cost of Living increases to both seniors and military to address RAYgun's out of control spending.

[George II]

2. Exactly, and it was very temporary. There's a new dictionary out there now, "freeze" means "cut".

[George II]

3. And now Sanders' National Press Secretary is retweeting tweets from "Joe Biden is corrupt"! Yeah....

....I wonder if she missed the apology?

[Thekaspervote]

5. Let's give the guy a bigger shovel!!

Hello...you negativity isn’t working...hello hello

[Autumn]

4. From an OP someone posted that you recommended. I included four paragraphs that didn't make their

cut. Very important paragraphs

https://www.democraticunderground.com/1287436537

Biden, Sanders, Social Security and Smears


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/20/opinion/biden-sanders-social-security.html


So, about the element of truth in the criticism of Biden: Once upon a time, there was a peculiar consensus among media figures and would-be centrists that the long-run cost of entitlement programs was America’s biggest problem, that Social Security in particular was in crisis and that something had to be done, with the solution including benefit cuts.

This consensus wasn’t based on hard thinking; it was about the attitude politicians were expected to display. As I wrote way back in 2007, proclaiming a Social Security crisis requiring cuts was seen as a “badge of seriousness,” a way of showing how statesmanlike and tough-minded you were.

The candidate I was criticizing, by the way — the guy I said had been “played for a sucker” — was a politician named Barack Obama. But Biden was certainly pulled in by that conventional wisdom, too, so it’s not hard to find old quotes in which he suggested possible Social Security cuts in the name of fiscal responsibility.

But that was then. These days, Biden, like many Democrats, is calling for an expansion of Social Security benefits. That doesn’t make his previous statements irrelevant; he should acknowledge that he has changed his position, and his history on the issue is one reason progressives worry that, if elected, he might fritter away his political capital in vain attempts to reach bipartisan compromise. (His role in passing the draconian 2005 bankruptcy bill, which got Elizabeth Warren involved in politics, is another.)

[Thekaspervote]

6. Blah blah blah

[Autumn]

9. Without these 4 paragraphs you were all excited about the "serious rebuke" to Sanders in the

the other OP. The part in article you think is so great that show Bernie was right are" Blah blah blah" ?

Thekaspervote

6. Blah blah blah

[George II]

7. Excuse me, that OP:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/1287436537

was yours and I did NOT recommend it.

[Autumn]

10. Excuse you George is right. I didn't say you recommended my OP. You recommended the OP that omitted

those critical parts that Krugman added that confirmed what Bernie said.

The candidate I was criticizing, by the way — the guy I said had been “played for a sucker” — was a politician named Barack Obama. But Biden was certainly pulled in by that conventional wisdom, too, so it’s not hard to find old quotes in which he suggested possible Social Security cuts in the name of fiscal responsibility

.

The OP you recommended.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/1287435852?fbclid=IwAR1Q2sbV-mBX9S3DCUxrMu2OKi_YHb3H7ILSaVJLLstByS7S-oNLZ_eF5iE

The OP I posed with FOUR paragraphs omitted from the other OP that show Bernie was right.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1287&pid=437123

[Demsrule86]

11. Sanders or Sanders people attacked Pres. Obama ...the greatest president of my lifetime is

only going to get him out of the primary faster... President Obama deserves better. He is not and never was a 'sucker'...shameful thing to say.

[Autumn]

12. Take it up with Krugman. I didn't write it, he did. Krugman doesn't appear to be a Sanders person.

[George II]

16. I read the entire column directly from the NY Times site. It is very long, and the OP cut...

...quite a bit, not just your four paragraphs.

[redqueen]

13. This is what gets me. We could actually discuss what actually happened.

But most seem to prefer insults, hyperbole, and missing the point.

[Me.]

8. Buck Stops Where?

[Cha]

14. POC are Smarter than

to fall for this ******** **.

[The Valley Below]

15. Big surprise.

Same old dirty tricks.