"17 angry Democrats"

[bigtree]

Last edited Sun Mar 24, 2019, 11:25 PM - Edit history (1)

...my ass.

This is a republican produced and republican handled document, investigating their own party. They don't get the benefit of the doubt here.

This is from Sen. Kamala Harris' communication director:

Ian Sams @IanSams 7m7 minutes ago
Until the report is made public and underlying investigative material is handed over to Congress, we will live in limbo with nothing more than a de facto "trust us, he's good" offered up by a Trump appointee.

Ian Sams @IanSams 18m18 minutes ago
CNN reports on air that Trump's lawyer got a readout of Barr's letter by the AG's chief of staff before it was sent to Congress and that Mueller was not consulted on the letter. Already, the facts are demanding that Barr testify under oath and release the full Mueller report.

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

[BlueFlorida]

1. K&R

[bigtree]

3. it has the candidate's comm mgr. statement

...somebody decide, because I'm full up trying to figure it out.

Seems to me a candidate's campaign's statement should go here, but the rudest poster to complain is king, I suppose.

It would be fine with me to be in general because this is forum is invisible to most of DU, by choice or by design, and I'm fed up with the split link when posting.

[Agschmid]

4. Ok.

[Andy823]

5. I am glad Harris is putting this out

The statement is correct, we need answers and Barr needs to be questioned under oath.