Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Imperialism Inc.

(2,495 posts)
Fri Dec 6, 2019, 03:38 PM Dec 2019

Free Market Drugs: A Key Part of Elizabeth Warren's Transition to Medicare for All

Free Market Drugs: A Key Part of Elizabeth Warren's Transition to Medicare for All
http://cepr.net/blogs/beat-the-press/free-market-drugs-a-key-part-of-elizabeth-warren-s-transition-to-medicare-for-all

...
While these measures captured most of the attention given to Warren’s transition plan, another part of the plan is probably at least as important. Warren proposed to use the government’s authority to compel the licensing of drug patents so that multiple companies can produce a patented drug, in effect allowing them to be sold at generic prices.

The government can do this both because it has general authority to compel licensing of patents (with reasonable compensation) and because it has explicit authority under the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act to require licensing of any drug developed in part with government-funded research. The overwhelming majority of drugs required some amount of government-supported research in their development, so there would be few drugs that would be exempted if Warren decided to use this mechanism.

These measures are noteworthy because they can be done on the president’s own authority. While the pharmaceutical industry will surely contest in court a president’s use of the government’s authority to weaken their patent rights, these actions would not require Congressional approval.

...
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Free Market Drugs: A Key Part of Elizabeth Warren's Transition to Medicare for All (Original Post) Imperialism Inc. Dec 2019 OP
! redqueen Dec 2019 #1
why would any company spend millions and millions developing drugs they don't get the patent for? Demsrule86 Dec 2019 #2
That's exactly the point. Any laws that overly restrict the profits of drugs.... George II Dec 2019 #3
I'm stunned to see these arguments being used on DU redqueen Dec 2019 #5
Drug research and medical research The Mouth Dec 2019 #4
Unless the government develops and produces all prescription MineralMan Dec 2019 #6
I should have said 'no profit off the RESEARCH' The Mouth Dec 2019 #7
 

Demsrule86

(68,586 posts)
2. why would any company spend millions and millions developing drugs they don't get the patent for?
Fri Dec 6, 2019, 03:42 PM
Dec 2019

and consider the companies buying up insulin and old drugs and then charging prices that are 100 time more than they used to? We could eradicate Hep C...gone. But we don't because a fair number can't afford the medicine...how fucked up is that?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

George II

(67,782 posts)
3. That's exactly the point. Any laws that overly restrict the profits of drugs....
Fri Dec 6, 2019, 03:56 PM
Dec 2019

....will cause the developers to cut back on research.

People have to look at the whole picture. They see a drug that "costs" $10 to manufacture that has a selling price of $50 (just picking numbers here) They think the drug company is ripping off the people.

They fail to recognize that the drug may have taken several years to develop and cost millions of dollars in research. Many of these drugs take years for the company to break even. If that's even further restricted, the company will just forget about developing new drugs.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
5. I'm stunned to see these arguments being used on DU
Fri Dec 6, 2019, 04:22 PM
Dec 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

The Mouth

(3,150 posts)
4. Drug research and medical research
Fri Dec 6, 2019, 03:59 PM
Dec 2019

should be pubicly funded.

My hearing aids cost $4K, there is no reason they should cost more than four bucks.

all drugs should be sold for their cost to make, all patents invalidated, with the amount of research reimbursed to the companies 0 the ACTUAL cost of research.

There should be only generics.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
6. Unless the government develops and produces all prescription
Fri Dec 6, 2019, 04:25 PM
Dec 2019

drugs, it cannot simply force companies to make them. There is no way to force any company to make any product, and profit is always a consideration for private companies.

So, your idea dies before it can be implemented.

No company will produce anything if there is no profit involved. It is that simple. Add to that the fact that the federal government has no real experience in manufacturing pharmaceuticals and what you describe is a system for there being no drugs for people to take at all.

Instead, some sort of regulation of acceptable profit margins will work much better. But, as long as this country operates with private companies manufacturing things, your idea is unworkable and will only result in no drugs being available at all.

Even generic drug manufacturers make a profit from the products they make. You have to work within the reality of things.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

The Mouth

(3,150 posts)
7. I should have said 'no profit off the RESEARCH'
Fri Dec 6, 2019, 04:29 PM
Dec 2019

Sorry, could have expressed the concept better.

Government does the research, releases the formulation to the public, no patent.

Then let the free market work, since no drugs have a proprietary formulation, anyone can make them.

The reason the expensive drugs cost so much is patents.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Free Market Drugs: A Key ...