Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

UCmeNdc

(9,601 posts)
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 06:43 AM Oct 2019

Tulsi Gabbard Does Not Deny Being A Russian Asset

You’d think a Democratic presidential candidate would vehemently deny being a Russian asset - but Tulsi Gabbard dodged and deflected when asked about such accusations by Tucker Carlson.

In case you’ve missed the controversy, Hillary Clinton made a clear suggestion this week that Russians are grooming Gabbard to run as a third-party candidate. Although Clinton didn't name names, Russian support for Gabbard has long been obvious.

Gabbard has repeatedly stated she has no plans to run as a third-party candidate. Yesterday, she told NBC News, “I want to be very clear … I will not run as a third party candidate or as an independent.” She made a similarly unequivocal pledge on CNN in August.

Yet, when she appeared last night on Tucker Carlson Tonight for the second time this week, she did not directly respond to Tucker Carlson’s opening question, “So just to the factual point first, are you a Russian sleeper cell?” Instead, she evasively changed the subject and attacked Clinton:

Snip.......

In fact, Gabbard’s Twitter clapbacks to Clinton didn’t deny the accusation either.

https://crooksandliars.com/2019/10/tulsi-gabbard-does-not-deny-being-russian
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tulsi Gabbard Does Not Deny Being A Russian Asset (Original Post) UCmeNdc Oct 2019 OP
Post removed Post removed Oct 2019 #1
Newbie trashing the DNC as "corrupt". Cattledog Oct 2019 #4
There seems to be a lot of that going around here StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #29
Shocking. Cha Oct 2019 #49
FWIW, Hillary warned us of the "vast rightwing conspiracy" against her and her husband no_hypocrisy Oct 2019 #2
And she was laughed at and told to shut up then, too StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #30
and she was correct about Drumpf - modern day Cassandra Hestia Oct 2019 #42
Hillary was right about everything! Cha Oct 2019 #50
OMG! jcmaine72 Oct 2019 #3
Well it is very easy to stand up and be counted. As a soldier you know how to fight back. UCmeNdc Oct 2019 #5
You mentioned an investigation into her past. Has one actually been conducted? jcmaine72 Oct 2019 #6
Umm.... LovingA2andMI Oct 2019 #19
Obvious? How? Where's the proof? jcmaine72 Oct 2019 #20
Obvious.... LovingA2andMI Oct 2019 #35
I read the comments on You Tube BigmanPigman Oct 2019 #56
Brilliant Retort : Gabbard as Strawberry Sundae ritapria Oct 2019 #7
You mean like calling someone the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, personification of StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #31
Secretary Clinton's claim that Russia may be planning sabotage is backed up by evidence. lapucelle Oct 2019 #44
When was Gabbard asked if she was a strawberry sundae? Dem4Life1102 Oct 2019 #8
She doesn't have to in order for it to be true!!! jcmaine72 Oct 2019 #9
Who charged her with being a strawberry sundae? Dem4Life1102 Oct 2019 #10
I did! jcmaine72 Oct 2019 #11
Are you a former Democratic Party nominee? Dem4Life1102 Oct 2019 #14
Is that criteria needed to make a baseless claim? jcmaine72 Oct 2019 #17
Then why didn't she just say no Dem4Life1102 Oct 2019 #18
For the same reason she probably wouldn't answer my accusation of her being a strawberry sundae. jcmaine72 Oct 2019 #21
Specious logic Dem4Life1102 Oct 2019 #26
So you think that proves something? Boomer Oct 2019 #33
It proves Dem4Life1102 Oct 2019 #38
True. If she refuted it, anyone who believes the accusation wouldn't believe her refutation. thesquanderer Oct 2019 #52
You think Hillary and Bill Clinton don't have better intel on this than us sitting at... brush Oct 2019 #28
Theree is no evidence that she is being promoted on the numerous strawberry web sites. beastie boy Oct 2019 #39
So Russian influence in American elections is fake news? betsuni Oct 2019 #12
Are you replying to me? jcmaine72 Oct 2019 #15
... betsuni Oct 2019 #22
Comrade? Me. Oct 2019 #57
Did I really need to use a sarcasm emoji there? jcmaine72 Oct 2019 #59
Yes, Actually, You Did Me. Oct 2019 #60
Sorry, I didn't realize I was going so fast in a thread in which jcmaine72 Oct 2019 #61
Good Me. Oct 2019 #63
Some people are awfully upset that Hillary blew up one of the avenues for interference StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #40
+1 2naSalit Oct 2019 #58
Strawberries are a nice shade of Russian red IronLionZion Oct 2019 #25
Was Tulsi asked if she was a strawberry sundae? N/T lapucelle Oct 2019 #32
If asked, she would react exactly like how a strawberry sundae would react IronLionZion Oct 2019 #34
LOL. Quixote1818 Oct 2019 #47
It's the loaded question fallacy and it makes her look like a victim. Aaron Pereira Oct 2019 #48
reductio ad absurdum LanternWaste Oct 2019 #64
"Are you now or have you ever been..." melman Oct 2019 #13
Everything old is new again. jcmaine72 Oct 2019 #16
The New York Times is engaging in McCarthyism? lapucelle Oct 2019 #36
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2019 #45
Yeah, What IS gabbard up to?! She likes to disingenuously Cha Oct 2019 #53
That's a Sean Hannity talking point. lapucelle Oct 2019 #54
Hmmm.. coincidence? Cha Oct 2019 #55
I hate it when candidates are vetted. LanternWaste Oct 2019 #65
Sounds like Trump IronLionZion Oct 2019 #23
Because they are both owned by the same person. Joe941 Oct 2019 #46
So, she's not denying something she hasn't been accused of? pintobean Oct 2019 #24
Hillary Clinton is 100 % right . stonecutter357 Oct 2019 #27
It's telling Gabbard tweeted false, Republican talking points about Hillary dlk Oct 2019 #37
Jill Stein denies being a Russian spy or asset, Tulsi Gabbard has not IronLionZion Oct 2019 #41
K&R Gothmog Oct 2019 #43
Clinton didn't name her she outed herself. nt doc03 Oct 2019 #51
Yep -- no denial whatsoever n/t PhoenixDem Oct 2019 #62
Trump feeds Clinton-Gabbard feud at140 Oct 2019 #66
Yeah.. she can't answer the question. Cha Oct 2019 #67

Response to UCmeNdc (Original post)

 

Cattledog

(5,919 posts)
4. Newbie trashing the DNC as "corrupt".
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 07:09 AM
Oct 2019

Interesting.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
29. There seems to be a lot of that going around here
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:36 AM
Oct 2019

Tulsi must surely appreciate the number of "defenders" who have joined DU in the past couple of days to protect her honor, or something.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

no_hypocrisy

(46,202 posts)
2. FWIW, Hillary warned us of the "vast rightwing conspiracy" against her and her husband
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 07:05 AM
Oct 2019

in the late Nineties. And she was accurate and prescient.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
30. And she was laughed at and told to shut up then, too
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:37 AM
Oct 2019

Some people never learn.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Hestia

(3,818 posts)
42. and she was correct about Drumpf - modern day Cassandra
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 11:36 AM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Cha

(297,705 posts)
50. Hillary was right about everything!
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 04:44 PM
Oct 2019

gabbard went paranoid and lost it.. not presidential..


If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
3. OMG!
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 07:09 AM
Oct 2019

You know, now that you mention it.....she hasn't denied being a strawberry sundae either. We all know what that obviously and irrefutably means.

Tulsi Gabbard: Russian asset and strawberry sundae.

Blast her!!!!

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

UCmeNdc

(9,601 posts)
5. Well it is very easy to stand up and be counted. As a soldier you know how to fight back.
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 07:16 AM
Oct 2019

Unless the accusations are true and you suspect that once people start investigating your background then you will be exposed.

Her online support is all trolls and bots. She’s either a useful idiot or she’s in on it.


But something is going on there.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
6. You mentioned an investigation into her past. Has one actually been conducted?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 07:36 AM
Oct 2019

Until one has, and proper, verifiable evidence that Gabbard is Ivan's ventriloquist dummy surfaces, I think I'll reserve judgement.

I dunno, I'm just old fashioned that way.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
19. Umm....
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:29 AM
Oct 2019

Interesting. The Reserving Judgement crowd on something that is obvious at this point. Interesting....

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
20. Obvious? How? Where's the proof?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:42 AM
Oct 2019

If it's so obvious it should be a snap to prove, right?

I can, for example, prove to you that fire is hot by grazing your hand with a lit match, or that ice is cold by placing an ice cube in your hands.

So let's try that.

Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian asset because... (Please place something irrefutable here).

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

BigmanPigman

(51,632 posts)
56. I read the comments on You Tube
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 05:48 PM
Oct 2019

after Susan Rice and another guest discussed Tulsi on Real Time. Rice said that Hillary merely said that several things Tulsi has said are questionable. The comments were ALL pro Tulsi and they loved her being a vet and not a "warmonger". One person suggested they were bots but she was shut down immediately by everyone else. Are all of these comments from bots? Three Dem candidates are defending Tulsi too. What is going on?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

ritapria

(1,812 posts)
7. Brilliant Retort : Gabbard as Strawberry Sundae
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 07:39 AM
Oct 2019

And Funny, too …… Accusations not backed up by evidence are smears ..I want to see the evidence

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
31. You mean like calling someone the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, personification of
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:39 AM
Oct 2019

personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long," and is behind a "concerted effort" to destroy Gabbard's reputation?

You know, accusations not backed up by evidence. But Tulsi said it about Hillary, so that's different somehow, right?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

lapucelle

(18,350 posts)
44. Secretary Clinton's claim that Russia may be planning sabotage is backed up by evidence.
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 02:55 PM
Oct 2019

While Secretary Clinton never mentioned Tulsi's name, neither journalists nor Bill Browder have been so circumspect.

What, Exactly, Is Tulsi Gabbard Up To?

By Lisa Lerer
Published Oct. 12, 2019
Updated Oct. 18, 2019

As she injects chaos into the 2020 Democratic primary by accusing her own party of “rigging” the election, an array of alt-right internet stars, white nationalists and Russians have praised her.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/us/politics/tulsi-gabbard.html

*****************************************************************************
Tulsi Gabbard: White nationalists and Russian propaganda machine throw support behind 2020 candidate

The Hawaii Democrat is facing a growing pool of controversies surrounding her 2020 presidential candidacy

Chris Riotta
New York
Thursday 7 February 2019

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election/tulsi-gabbard-russia-david-duke-policies-2020-campaign-white-nationalist-hawaii-propaganda-a8768056.html

****************************************************************************
Russia's propaganda machine discovers 2020 Democratic candidate Tulsi Gabbard

Experts who track websites and social media linked to Russia have seen stirrings of a possible campaign of support for Hawaii Democrat Tulsi Gabbard.

Feb. 2, 2019, 7:03 AM EST
By Robert Windrem and Ben Popken

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/russia-s-propaganda-machine-discovers-2020-democratic-candidate-tulsi-gabbard-n964261

****************************************************************************


****************************************************************************
Tulsi Gabbard Hires Russian Agent to Keep Hawaii Media in Check

by Andrew Walden
Friday, January 05, 2018

Russia has lots of experience in media censorship. So perhaps it is logical that Rep Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI-2) hires an agent of the Russian government as a ‘consultant’ to keep Hawaii media under control.

But Gabbard’s consultant, Chris Cooper of the Potomac Square Group, is no ordinary Russian agent. Cooper is allegedly one of seven identified as being at the center of illegal Russian lobbying efforts reaching into the Trump campaign and Congress.

http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/ID/20879/Tulsi-Gabbard-Hires-Russian-Agent-to-Keep-Hawaii-Media-in-Check.aspx

**************************************************************************


If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Dem4Life1102

(3,974 posts)
8. When was Gabbard asked if she was a strawberry sundae?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 07:47 AM
Oct 2019

Please provide links

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
9. She doesn't have to in order for it to be true!!!
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 07:54 AM
Oct 2019

Haven't you been paying attention?

Why are you asking such questions, anyway? You're not denying that the charge of her being a strawberry sundae are true, are you?

Wait a sec. Do you, do you....speak Russian by any chance?

Ah ha!!!

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Dem4Life1102

(3,974 posts)
10. Who charged her with being a strawberry sundae?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 07:56 AM
Oct 2019

Again please provide links?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
11. I did!
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:00 AM
Oct 2019

And the simple fact that she's been accused is all the proof any of us should ever need or want.

Hmmmm....you sure ask a lot of questions. Tell me, have you ever addressed a friend or colleague as "comrade".

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Dem4Life1102

(3,974 posts)
14. Are you a former Democratic Party nominee?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:05 AM
Oct 2019

Are you Clinton or Kerry or maybe Gore?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
17. Is that criteria needed to make a baseless claim?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:17 AM
Oct 2019

Oh well, you got me.

Jeez, if that's the new standard for making accusations stick, no wonder Trump thinks he can he shit on the American people the way he does with impunity.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Dem4Life1102

(3,974 posts)
18. Then why didn't she just say no
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:22 AM
Oct 2019

when asked the direct question if she is a Russian asset? Why did she deflect?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
21. For the same reason she probably wouldn't answer my accusation of her being a strawberry sundae.
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:52 AM
Oct 2019

Some accusations are so ridiculous on their face they don't merit a response.

Another way you could look at this (gasp!) is that if Hillary really believes Tulsi is a Russian asset, and if it's such an obvious truth (as you stated), what trouble would it have been for Hillary to simply produce some piece of ironclad evidence that Tulsi could never deny?

Sorry, but remaining silent in the aftermath of an unproven accusation does not make that accusation true.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Dem4Life1102

(3,974 posts)
26. Specious logic
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:20 AM
Oct 2019

She goes on FAUX News to defend herself and is thrown a softball question that should have been an easy no but instead she deflected.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Boomer

(4,168 posts)
33. So you think that proves something?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:45 AM
Oct 2019

If Gabbard didn't firmly and directly refute this statement, then.... she's so honor-bound to tell the truth that she had to deflect away from it on national TV rather than blurt out "Yes, I'm a Russian asset! You caught me, I cannot tell a lie."?

Ridiculous.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Dem4Life1102

(3,974 posts)
38. It proves
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 10:23 AM
Oct 2019

that she didn’t deny it.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

thesquanderer

(11,993 posts)
52. True. If she refuted it, anyone who believes the accusation wouldn't believe her refutation.
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 04:54 PM
Oct 2019

It would basically be:

"I am not a Russian asset!"
"See? That's exactly what a Russian asset would say!"

Fact is, those who hate TG would hate her no matter how she answered.

That said, I think her comments about HRC were awful. When Hillary went low (i.e. attacked), TG could have gone high. But who knows, some people think her attack on HRC may actually help her. I think it really squashes any idea she may have had about possibly being someone's VP, though.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

brush

(53,876 posts)
28. You think Hillary and Bill Clinton don't have better intel on this than us sitting at...
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:35 AM
Oct 2019

our keyboards? I think they do, but in case you don't know Gabbard hired Chris Cooper, the smear campaigner who was paid by Natalia Veselnitskaya and her Russian backed sponsor.

Veselnitskaya, if you don't remember, is the Russian lawyer from the infamous trump tower meeting in 2016 where Jr. trump, Kushner and Manafort attended to get dirt on Hillary Clinton.

Why in the hell would a Democratic presidential candidate want to hire someone like that? Seems you'd want to steer 100 miles clear of being associated with someone like that if you're a Democrat, especially if you're running for office, and the presidency no less.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

beastie boy

(9,459 posts)
39. Theree is no evidence that she is being promoted on the numerous strawberry web sites.
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 10:32 AM
Oct 2019

There is plenty of evidence that she is being promoted by a whole bunch of Russian trolls (I have my suspicions in this regard, but I am not making any accusations) and RT, a known Putin moughpiece.

Furthermore, I am not aware of anyone asking her whether she is a strawberry sundae and her saying she is not responsible for what strawberry trolls do or not do. If she ever does, I will have reasons to suspect she is a strawberry sundae.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

betsuni

(25,642 posts)
12. So Russian influence in American elections is fake news?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:00 AM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
15. Are you replying to me?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:09 AM
Oct 2019

Last edited Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:56 AM - Edit history (1)

Because I don't remember stating the following: "Russian influence in American elections is fake news".

Kinda pulled that one outta the non sequitur hole, eh?

Wait sec. Is this some sort of a smoke screen to deny the fact that Tulsi Gabbard is a strawberry sundae?

Nice try, comrade!

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Me.

(35,454 posts)
57. Comrade?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 05:59 PM
Oct 2019

Really...that's how you want to roll?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
59. Did I really need to use a sarcasm emoji there?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 10:08 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Me.

(35,454 posts)
60. Yes, Actually, You Did
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 10:09 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
61. Sorry, I didn't realize I was going so fast in a thread in which
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 10:21 PM
Oct 2019

...I likened Tulsi Gabbard to a strawberry sundae (which she still hasn't denied, BTW).

--- Officially stamped by Acme Sarcasm INC.---

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Me.

(35,454 posts)
63. Good
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 10:52 PM
Oct 2019

Because sometimes, lately, the fiction is living too close to fact

As for Tulski, she has left a trail and the breadcrumbs are becoming easier to follow.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
40. Some people are awfully upset that Hillary blew up one of the avenues for interference
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 10:47 AM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

IronLionZion

(45,540 posts)
25. Strawberries are a nice shade of Russian red
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:17 AM
Oct 2019

Trump Unable To Produce Certificate Proving He's Not A Festering Pile Of Shit
https://politics.theonion.com/trump-unable-to-produce-certificate-proving-hes-not-a-f-1819590270



Hillary didn't name her. Tulsi exposed herself. Her reaction says everything.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

lapucelle

(18,350 posts)
32. Was Tulsi asked if she was a strawberry sundae? N/T
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:41 AM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

IronLionZion

(45,540 posts)
34. If asked, she would react exactly like how a strawberry sundae would react
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:48 AM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Quixote1818

(28,979 posts)
47. LOL.
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 03:57 PM
Oct 2019

Your post cracked me up. Strawberry Sunday!

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Aaron Pereira

(383 posts)
48. It's the loaded question fallacy and it makes her look like a victim.
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 03:57 PM
Oct 2019

Without evidence charges like this are a mistake which she seems to be taking full advantage of.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
64. reductio ad absurdum
Mon Oct 21, 2019, 12:51 PM
Oct 2019

Today's logical fallacy brought to us by Apagogical Argument Institute.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

melman

(7,681 posts)
13. "Are you now or have you ever been..."
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:03 AM
Oct 2019

Fucking hell. Things are getting scary.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
16. Everything old is new again.
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:12 AM
Oct 2019

Like my mother always told me: "Sooner or later, everything comes back into fashion". Why should McCarthyism be any different?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

lapucelle

(18,350 posts)
36. The New York Times is engaging in McCarthyism?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:51 AM
Oct 2019
What, Exactly, Is Tulsi Gabbard Up To?

As she injects chaos into the 2020 Democratic primary by accusing her own party of “rigging” the election, an array of alt-right internet stars, white nationalists and Russians have praised her.

By Lisa Lerer
Published Oct. 12, 2019
Updated Oct. 18, 2019

An independent analysis of the Russian news media found that RT, the Kremlin-backed news agency, mentioned Ms. Gabbard frequently for a candidate polling in single digits, according to data collected by the Alliance for Securing Democracy, a group that seeks to track and expose efforts by authoritarian regimes to undermine democratic elections.

Disinformation experts have also pointed to instances of suspicious activity surrounding Ms. Gabbard’s campaign — in particular, a Twitter hashtag, #KamalaHarrisDestroyed, that trended among Ms. Gabbard’s supporters after the first Democratic debate, and appeared to be amplified by a coordinated network of bot-like accounts — but there is no evidence of coordination between these networks and the campaign itself.


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/us/politics/tulsi-gabbard.html
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Response to lapucelle (Reply #36)

 

Cha

(297,705 posts)
53. Yeah, What IS gabbard up to?! She likes to disingenuously
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 05:08 PM
Oct 2019

point fingers at Dems..



Mahalo for the article, lapucelle!

What, Exactly, Is Tulsi Gabbard Up To?

As she injects chaos into the 2020 Democratic primary by accusing her own party of “rigging” the election, an array of alt-right internet stars, white nationalists and Russians have praised her.

By Lisa Lerer
Published Oct. 12, 2019
Updated Oct. 18, 2019

An independent analysis of the Russian news media found that RT, the Kremlin-backed news agency, mentioned Ms. Gabbard frequently for a candidate polling in single digits, according to data collected by the Alliance for Securing Democracy, a group that seeks to track and expose efforts by authoritarian regimes to undermine democratic elections.

Disinformation experts have also pointed to instances of suspicious activity surrounding Ms. Gabbard’s campaign — in particular, a Twitter hashtag, #KamalaHarrisDestroyed, that trended among Ms. Gabbard’s supporters after the first Democratic debate, and appeared to be amplified by a coordinated network of bot-like accounts — but there is no evidence of coordination between these networks and the campaign itself.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/us/politics/tulsi-gabbard.html
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

lapucelle

(18,350 posts)
54. That's a Sean Hannity talking point.
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 05:27 PM
Oct 2019

SMH

Mahalo for the tweet.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Cha

(297,705 posts)
55. Hmmm.. coincidence?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 05:34 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
65. I hate it when candidates are vetted.
Mon Oct 21, 2019, 12:54 PM
Oct 2019

Really roughs up the daily narrative.

Soft-ball questions only should be allowed. Covered in mayonnaise... as it looks like ice-cream for the sundae.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

IronLionZion

(45,540 posts)
23. Sounds like Trump
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:00 AM
Oct 2019

her tweets look like Trump's. Her supporters look like Trump's.



If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Joe941

(2,848 posts)
46. Because they are both owned by the same person.
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 03:43 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
24. So, she's not denying something she hasn't been accused of?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:01 AM
Oct 2019

Carlson’s question was facetious.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

stonecutter357

(12,697 posts)
27. Hillary Clinton is 100 % right .
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:35 AM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

dlk

(11,578 posts)
37. It's telling Gabbard tweeted false, Republican talking points about Hillary
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 10:12 AM
Oct 2019

I was surprised when Gabbard stated in the last debate she had reached out to Trey Gowdy, a hyper-partisan zealot. When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

IronLionZion

(45,540 posts)
41. Jill Stein denies being a Russian spy or asset, Tulsi Gabbard has not
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 10:53 AM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

doc03

(35,382 posts)
51. Clinton didn't name her she outed herself. nt
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 04:50 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

PhoenixDem

(581 posts)
62. Yep -- no denial whatsoever n/t
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 10:22 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Cha

(297,705 posts)
67. Yeah.. she can't answer the question.
Mon Oct 21, 2019, 09:54 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Tulsi Gabbard Does Not De...