Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Related: About this forum
Congratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
Unfit for Office
Donald Trumps narcissism makes it impossible for him to carry out the duties of the presidency in the way the Constitution requires.*********
This article is from a couple days ago, but I just saw it in my newsfeed today.
If it's a duplicate, sorry and please feel free to alert and have it deleted. But, if you too, are just seeing it, it is WELL worth a thorough read.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/10/george-conway-trump-unfit-office/599128/
There are so many excellent quotable parts that it is difficult to choose among them. Here are a few:
...
The Framers of the Constitution expected the presidency to be occupied by special individuals, selfless people of the highest character and ability. They intended the Electoral College to be a truly deliberative body, not the largely ceremonial institution it has become today. Because the Electoral College, unlike Congress and the state legislatures, wouldnt be a permanent body, and because it involved diffuse selections made in the various states, they hoped it would help avoid cabal, intrigue and corruption, as Alexander Hamilton put it in Federalist No. 68, and deter interference from these most deadly adversaries of republican government, especially from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils.
...
Hamiltons use of the word trust in The Federalist Papers to describe the presidency was no accident. The Framers intended that the president be like a fiduciary, who must pursue the public interest in good faith republican fashion rather than pursuing his self-interest, and who must diligently and steadily execute Congresss commands, as a recent Harvard Law Review article puts it. The concept is akin to the law of private fiduciaries, which governs trustees of trusts and directors and officers of corporations, an area that has been central to my legal practice as a corporate litigator. Indeed, as the Harvard Law Review article explains, one might argue that what presents to us as private fiduciary law today had some of its genesis in the law of public officeholding. The overarching principle is that a fiduciarysay, the CEO of a corporationwhen acting on behalf of a corporation, has to act in the corporations best interests. Likewise, a trustee of a trust must use the assets for the benefit of the beneficiary, and not himself (a fundamental rule, incidentally, that Trump apparently couldnt adhere to with his own charitable foundation).
...
A certain amount of narcissism is healthy, and helpfulit brings with it confidence, optimism, and boldness. Someone with more than an average amount of narcissism may be called a narcissist. Many politicians, and many celebrities, could be considered narcissists; presidents seem especially likely to rank high in extroverted narcissism, Malkin writes, although they have varied greatly in the degree of their narcissism. But extreme narcissism can be pathological, an illnessand potentially a danger, as it was for Narcissus. Pathological narcissism begins when people become so addicted to feeling special that, just like with any drug, theyll do anything to get their high, including lie, steal, cheat, betray, and even hurt those closest to them, Malkin says.
The fundamental life goal of an extreme narcissist is to promote the greatness of the self, for all to see, the psychologist Dan P. McAdams wrote in The Atlantic. To many mental-health professionals, Donald Trump provides a perfect example of such extreme, pathological narcissism: One clinical psychologist told Vanity Fair that he considers Trump such a classic pathological narcissist that he is actually archiving video clips of him to use in workshops because theres no better example of the characteristics of the disorder he displays. Otherwise, this clinician explained, I would have had to hire actors and write vignettes. Hes like a dream come true. Another clinical psychologist said that Trump displays textbook narcissistic personality disorder.
...
The Framers of the Constitution expected the presidency to be occupied by special individuals, selfless people of the highest character and ability. They intended the Electoral College to be a truly deliberative body, not the largely ceremonial institution it has become today. Because the Electoral College, unlike Congress and the state legislatures, wouldnt be a permanent body, and because it involved diffuse selections made in the various states, they hoped it would help avoid cabal, intrigue and corruption, as Alexander Hamilton put it in Federalist No. 68, and deter interference from these most deadly adversaries of republican government, especially from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils.
...
Hamiltons use of the word trust in The Federalist Papers to describe the presidency was no accident. The Framers intended that the president be like a fiduciary, who must pursue the public interest in good faith republican fashion rather than pursuing his self-interest, and who must diligently and steadily execute Congresss commands, as a recent Harvard Law Review article puts it. The concept is akin to the law of private fiduciaries, which governs trustees of trusts and directors and officers of corporations, an area that has been central to my legal practice as a corporate litigator. Indeed, as the Harvard Law Review article explains, one might argue that what presents to us as private fiduciary law today had some of its genesis in the law of public officeholding. The overarching principle is that a fiduciarysay, the CEO of a corporationwhen acting on behalf of a corporation, has to act in the corporations best interests. Likewise, a trustee of a trust must use the assets for the benefit of the beneficiary, and not himself (a fundamental rule, incidentally, that Trump apparently couldnt adhere to with his own charitable foundation).
...
A certain amount of narcissism is healthy, and helpfulit brings with it confidence, optimism, and boldness. Someone with more than an average amount of narcissism may be called a narcissist. Many politicians, and many celebrities, could be considered narcissists; presidents seem especially likely to rank high in extroverted narcissism, Malkin writes, although they have varied greatly in the degree of their narcissism. But extreme narcissism can be pathological, an illnessand potentially a danger, as it was for Narcissus. Pathological narcissism begins when people become so addicted to feeling special that, just like with any drug, theyll do anything to get their high, including lie, steal, cheat, betray, and even hurt those closest to them, Malkin says.
The fundamental life goal of an extreme narcissist is to promote the greatness of the self, for all to see, the psychologist Dan P. McAdams wrote in The Atlantic. To many mental-health professionals, Donald Trump provides a perfect example of such extreme, pathological narcissism: One clinical psychologist told Vanity Fair that he considers Trump such a classic pathological narcissist that he is actually archiving video clips of him to use in workshops because theres no better example of the characteristics of the disorder he displays. Otherwise, this clinician explained, I would have had to hire actors and write vignettes. Hes like a dream come true. Another clinical psychologist said that Trump displays textbook narcissistic personality disorder.
...
The article goes on to list nine indicators of pathological narcissism and describes how MF45's behavior ticks every box. It also describes how unlikely it is that the 25th Amendment will ever be used to remove someone - even someone so excessively and overtly - flawed from office.
After reading this, I can easily understand how dinner conversation in the Conway household must be ... ahem ... "interesting."
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 497 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Unfit for Office (Original Post)
BlueMTexpat
Oct 2019
OP
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)1. Blast it!
I really intended to post this in GD and now see that I mistakenly ticked the Dem Primaries Forum. My finger just won't learn to move to the right.
If this is a problem, I can repost. If not, I'll just leave it here.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden