Right-wing/Gabbard is Hillary-Clintoning Kamala Harris.

[DetlefK]

Link to tweet

So many Tulsi Gabbard-fans gripping about how they must stop Kamala Harris at all costs... It doesn't matter who wins the primary as long it's not Kamala Harris!





And now you know who really supports Tulsi Gabbard: The people who are on principle against everything mainstream, because it makes them look cool.

What are the odds that these people will vote republican once Gabbard loses the primary?

[EveHammond13]

1. can't Tom Perez do something about this - perhaps using "soft power" if necessary?

he probably can't come right out and tell her to stop

[RhodeIslandOne]

6. If he says boo to her, the Assange wing will start the "unfair" accusations

Let Tulsi die in the vine.

[Hortensis]

15. +1.

[sharedvalues]

17. That includes DUers rejecting her too

She’s an Assad apologist. She should have 0% DU support.

[RhodeIslandOne]

35. She also wanted us to accept Mueller's report as a nothingburger

And that the President is not in bed with Russia.

She is a Trump/Putin sleeper.

[sharedvalues]

38. Yes. She should have 0% support here.

[Cha]

2. WTHH! Dumbshites!

[wyldwolf]

3. why Harris?

Am I missing something?

[crazytown]

4. One strand of Kamala's defense after the debate

was to point to Gabbard's history as an apologist for Bashar al-Assad and for Russian involvement in Syria.

[pnwmom]

10. I think everyone should be pointing that out. Obama compared Assad's gassings

of his people to the Nazis. Gabbard's in denial on that.

[crazytown]

12. Nerve Gas - Sarin, used in Ghouta, Syria is the most horrifying weapon.

It paralyses the lungs - victims suffocate to death, enduring 3 to 4 minutes of absolute terror.

[Demsrule86]

23. I think Sen. Harris should address the attacks...going after Gabbard only makes her look

like she has something to hide. She will need to address her past as a DA and AG at some point...sooner is better than later.

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

41. I agree, that was a tactical mistake by Kamala... not that she can't recover, though she needs to

respond to the charges.


Bernie & Elizabeth 2020!!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!

[Demsrule86]

44. She should do it sooner rather than later...and I agree she can recover...whether she does it or

not will also say something about her temperament and whether she should be president...a president can't let anger dictate his/her policy.

[pnwmom]

11. Some Rs have the theory that Harris is the biggest threat. But they probably

want to kneecap all the top candidates.

[Hortensis]

16. She's a woman who could soar, best that a woman lead the attack.

Remember Carly Fiorina and the Republicans fake-qualifying her for their debates in order to have a female attack dog to sic on Hillary?

Gabbard is currently performing the same function.

[thesquanderer]

21. Maybe she was auditioning to be Biden's VP?

She did just was his VP should do... attack the biggest thorn in his side, so he doesn't have to do it himself. Harris zinged Biden first, and now she gets some comeuppence without Biden having to resort to doing it himself, he gets to stay out of the mud.

[betsuni]

5. Reddit has a "List of Damning Articles on Harris."

Conspiracy theories and misinformation. Also posted at JPR. Nutty.

[Cha]

7. lol..

jpr's on the case?

[NurseJackie]

8. Oh dear... I guess that means it's GAME OVER, eh?

JPR has the biggest collection of fools and idiots I've ever seen.

[betsuni]

9. When JPR is on the case, you know ...

[crazytown]

14. JPR?

Even Manny Goldstein high tailed it out there

[JI7]

13. interesting that Trump and Tulsi Gabbard have both been going after Google

reminds me of how Trump, wikileaks, Putin, Stein and another campaign were all spreading DNC conspiracies .

people made excuses for her false claims about Mueller's report by saying that was before it was actually released.

so why not correct her earlier statement ?

why is she going after another democrat at a time when all democrats have been focused on gun violence ?

[sharedvalues]

18. Correct. Gabbards responsibility to the nation is to go after gun violence

Instead she’s criticizing another good Democrat.

Goodbye Tulsi. Please enjoy your primarying.

(There’s a real chance Gabbard will run as a third party candidate. In which case she will get Trump elected. Reject Gabbard now.)

[Demsrule86]

24. And Sen. Harris also criticized a good Democrat...not feeling sorry for Sen. Harris.

[JI7]

25. there is a difference between Primary politics in attempt to win the nomination and what Gabbard is

doing .

Harris did not make comments like Biden was unqualified or his entire life is a lie and similar shit. she brought up on POLICY issue in an attempt to try to get some voters away from him. it didn't work but it wasn't anything more than that.

[Demsrule86]

28. It is exactly what Gabbard is doing. And calling someone a racist is an attempt to destroy them...

worse than Gabbard's actions in my opinion...and Sen. Harris tried again in the second debate. Gabbard has bought up issues concerning Sen. Harris's tenure as DA and AG...fair game. She has questioned Sen. Harris's policy decisions. Now that aside, reputable sources have supported Gabbard's charges,thus Sen. Harris should address the substance of this not and continue to attack the messenger.

[Skya Rhen]

33. I completely agree. Harris needs to stand up to her or this will continue. What Gabbard is doing is

nothing, compared to what Trump would do in the general election. He knows no limits.

[Demsrule86]

34. Exactly...this is Harris's moment to lead...if she can.

After seeing her get angry and flustered at the second debate....a fair question is -does she have the temperament needed in a president...but it is one debate so she has a chance now to show what she is made of...

[thesquanderer]

20. "so why not correct her earlier statement ?"

Good question. I'd like to see her asked about her current position.

[Gothmog]

19. I stand with Senator Harris with respect to these attacks

[thesquanderer]

22. Who is Gadfly Morse, and why should we quote/link his feed?

I mean, you can find a queue of twitter nuts saying anything. What gives this any kind of legitimacy? I don't know about this OP. It seems kind of like quoting Brietbart. Or worse, just some right wing kook who reads Brietbart, and a handful of nutty followers. Seems about as relevant as posting a pizzagate tweet.

[DetlefK]

26. I'm not going by one person. I'm going by the general sentiment of all responses.

While Tulsi Gabbard gets a lot of hatred, those people who do love her see her as an opponent of the democratic establishment and they are obsessed with attacking Kamala Harris.

These people don't really care about supporting Tulsi Gabbard or touting her policies. They care about OPPOSING whatever they are supposed to oppose.

[thesquanderer]

27. re: "the general sentiment of all responses."

So he has a bunch of similarly nutty followers. It still looks like a pizzagate posting to me. Except that one had a LOT of nutty followers. I don't think we need to take every right-wing lunatic thread seriously.

[DetlefK]

30. Yeah. That Qanon- or Pizzagate- or Birther- or Invasion-stuff will never have consequences.

[dlk]

29. Does Gabbard Have Russian Connections?

We know they’re busier than ever this election cycle. Sowing discord and division is their goal (as well as flipping elections). I’m always suspicious of a candidate who spends more time attacking other candidates than promoting their policies and what they have to offer that’s superior.

[DetlefK]

31. Now that you mention it...

Tulsi Gabbard is getting positive articles in russian propaganda like RT.

A few months ago, I checked what RT thinks about the democratic candidates in general. They loved Gabbard and they hated Warren. (Way back when Warren was the frontrunner.)

Then Kamala Harris became the frontrunner after making good showing against Biden, and all of a sudden they loved Gabbard and hated Harris.

[cynatnite]

36. This struck me as Russian trolling while I read it. n/t

[Amimnoch]

32. Open season on open primary states.

With Cheetolini having no real primary contention, I am and have been concerned with tRumpublicon ratt-fuckery in states that have open primaries allowing Cheeto supporters to try to, en masse, affect our delegate outcomes in states where they are totally free to vote in our primary process.

States to keep an eye on during the season that have fully open or partially open processes:

Alabama
Arkansas
Colorado
Georgia
Illinois
Indiana
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
New Hampshire
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Vermont
Virginia
Wisconsin

[obamanut2012]

37. So much this

[dsp3000]

39. go away gabbard

NOT helping the democrats win at all.

[nbsmom]

40. SIGH

This is disturbing on all the levels. AGs and prosecutors need to be women and they need to be POC (ahem, Letitia James). Why is Gabbard piling on Harris? Wouldn’t shock me for several reasons. 1) it serves the purposes of the cable show bookers who want to maintain the “Dems in Disarray” narrative. 2) “Harris as AG did bad things “ is working for Gabbard as an issue, and she wants to qualify for the October debates somehow 3) Slamming on Harris means she doesn’t have to answer questions like, “Why are you an Assad apologist?” or “Who is paying for your media buys in N.H. and Iowa and SC.?”

[NCLefty]

42. Tulsi, who?

[JI7]

43. Tulsi Gabbard Endorsed Dennis Kucinich for Governor in April 2018

https://thinkprogress.org/dennis-kucinich-pro-syria-conference-25680624b32b/

https://www.cleveland.com/open/2018/02/dennis_kucinich_on_deep_state.html