Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Related: About this forum
Congratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
The Nation Jan, 2019: Tulsi Gabbard's Deceptive Foreign Policy (why the RW loves Tulsi)
Many are finding the RW's fixation and support for Gabbard a baffling paradox so I thought I'd try to find some possible reasons why the "love"The Hawaii congresswomans anti-interventionism masks an affinity for authoritarians, nationalists, and Islamophobes.
https://www.thenation.com/article/tulsi-gabbard-president-foreign-islam/
--snip--
Yet it would be a mistake to place Gabbard in the lineage of internationalist, anti-war American leftism that seeks, among other things, to help emancipate and defend the oppressed. In fact, Gabbards public record points in a much different direction, toward an America first Trumpism of the left that would restore the Middle Easts dictators club as long as it benefits the United States. On closer analysis, hers is a foreign policy that favors authoritarianism cloaked as counter-terrorism, nationalism cloaked as anti-interventionism, and Islamophobia barely cloaked at all.
To begin, Gabbard doesnt actually oppose military intervention, or the abusive tactics used to prosecute the war on terror, as long as theyre directed against those she identifies as Islamic extremists. She summarized her philosophy neatly in 2016, telling West Hawaii Today that when it comes to the war against terrorists, Im a hawk. When it comes to counterproductive wars of regime change, Im a dove.
Gabbard is a staunch supporter of the United States counter-ISIS campaign, but her view of the fight goes much further. During a visit to India in 2014, she told an interviewer that the United States had failed in its very clear mission to defeat Islamic extremismthe fight she said led her to enlist after the September 11 attacksand that we needed to focus all of our efforts and energy and root out this evil wherever it is. When pressed on whether torture could be part of those efforts, Gabbard didnt reject it, saying some believed it worked. Invoking the fantastical scenario of a ticking nuclear time bomb, Gabbard said that if she were president, she would do everything in my power to keep the American people safe. If there was a gap between Gabbards philosophy and the forever war, it was hard to spot.
--snip--
Opposing intervention and regime change was one thing, but Gabbard went much further, adopting Sisi and Assads talking points, denying their opponents agency and humanity, and effectively endorsing their systematic abuses of human rights as long as they were directed against the right people.
What laid behind this? Gabbards story about her time in Kuwait, including the eye-opening sight of women covered from head to toe with burqa, points to a years-long suspicion of Islam and a dalliance with Islamophobic strains in American politics that precedes the Trump presidency. In 2015, for instance, Gabbard spoke at a conference of Christians United for Israel, an organization led by John Hagee, a leading Islamophobe. Hageewhom John McCain renounced in 2008 after Hagee said Adolf Hitler hastened Gods plan by forcing Jews back to Israelhas written of a theological war to prevent the spread of global shariah.
To begin, Gabbard doesnt actually oppose military intervention, or the abusive tactics used to prosecute the war on terror, as long as theyre directed against those she identifies as Islamic extremists. She summarized her philosophy neatly in 2016, telling West Hawaii Today that when it comes to the war against terrorists, Im a hawk. When it comes to counterproductive wars of regime change, Im a dove.
Gabbard is a staunch supporter of the United States counter-ISIS campaign, but her view of the fight goes much further. During a visit to India in 2014, she told an interviewer that the United States had failed in its very clear mission to defeat Islamic extremismthe fight she said led her to enlist after the September 11 attacksand that we needed to focus all of our efforts and energy and root out this evil wherever it is. When pressed on whether torture could be part of those efforts, Gabbard didnt reject it, saying some believed it worked. Invoking the fantastical scenario of a ticking nuclear time bomb, Gabbard said that if she were president, she would do everything in my power to keep the American people safe. If there was a gap between Gabbards philosophy and the forever war, it was hard to spot.
--snip--
Opposing intervention and regime change was one thing, but Gabbard went much further, adopting Sisi and Assads talking points, denying their opponents agency and humanity, and effectively endorsing their systematic abuses of human rights as long as they were directed against the right people.
What laid behind this? Gabbards story about her time in Kuwait, including the eye-opening sight of women covered from head to toe with burqa, points to a years-long suspicion of Islam and a dalliance with Islamophobic strains in American politics that precedes the Trump presidency. In 2015, for instance, Gabbard spoke at a conference of Christians United for Israel, an organization led by John Hagee, a leading Islamophobe. Hageewhom John McCain renounced in 2008 after Hagee said Adolf Hitler hastened Gods plan by forcing Jews back to Israelhas written of a theological war to prevent the spread of global shariah.
Recommend reading the entire article at the link above.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 547 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Nation Jan, 2019: Tulsi Gabbard's Deceptive Foreign Policy (why the RW loves Tulsi) (Original Post)
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
OP
Response to hlthe2b (Original post)
brandnewday2009 This message was self-deleted by its author.
question everything
(47,510 posts)2. Sometimes, when individuals are set in their opinions
nothing will sway them they appear in control and, yes, presidential.
Beware of such autocrats.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden