Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,918 posts)
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 05:54 PM Nov 2015

Zionist Intolerance on Display Against Martin O'Malley for Criticizing Islamophobia .

Zionist Intolerance on Display Against Martin O'Malley

Intolerance, especially when it comes to issues involving the Middle East, is a destructive force that has distorted American politics and our policies, rendering us powerless to provide constructive leadership across the Arab World. Such intolerance was on display last week following Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley's appearance at the Arab American Institute's National Leadership Conference (NLC) in Dearborn, Michigan.

O'Malley, the former governor of Maryland, is one of the three remaining contestants in the Democratic presidential primary. In his address to the NLC, he spoke passionately both about the Syrian refugee crisis and Israeli and Palestinian victims of recent violence in Jerusalem. What was deeply distressing was the intolerance some supporters of Israel displayed not only toward O'Malley's remarks, but the very fact that he made them at an Arab American event.

Because O'Malley was the first candidate to champion the cause of Syrian refugees and because the first full day of our NLC was devoted to the refugee crisis, we were pleased that he accepted our invitation to deliver a keynote address. Before his remarks, O'Malley asked to meet with a small group of recent refugees who had made their way to Michigan. He joked with their children, listened to their stories, and responded with compassion to their plight.

While his formal speech to the NLC covered a range of topics, his focus was on the issue of the refugees, how we welcome them and how we treat them. He explained that the issue was of personal importance, noting how as Governor he kept on his desk a sign from the 1890's which read "Help Wanted: No Irish Need Apply". "It served", he said, "as a daily reminder" that "we were all immigrants" and that many groups, including his great grandparents, had to confront intolerance.

Because his family overcame discrimination and exclusion, O'Malley said that he was determined as Governor to "make the American Dream a reality for all people". During his two terms in office, he signed into law a "Dream Act" that provided educational opportunities for 36,000 children of undocumented residents. And he actively recruited Arab and Muslim Americans to serve in his Administration.

O'Malley then turned his attention to the scourges of bigotry and intolerance and the negative impact they had on Arabs and Muslims, observing how "this Islamophobia and xenophobia had entered the debate about those fleeing the horrific violence in Syria". He pledged to fight this because "we are a nation of immigrants and refugees...[and] we must not forget what it means to...yearn for a better life". He then reaffirmed his call to the Administration and Congress to admit 65,000 Syrian refugees, closing with this challenge—"Will we listen to our better angels or will we slam the doors and build walls?" . . .

"I am a strong supporter of the two-state solution, which would meet Israel’s critical security needs and affirm the dignity of the Palestinians to live as a free people in an independent state of their own".

The reaction to these words was immediate and intolerant. Some Jewish and right-wing publications criticized O'Malley for suggesting that "both sides" bore responsibility for the violence. His campaign was pressured to "clarify" or "repudiate" the remarks. Despite the fact that O'Malley's rather benign framing of the issue closely tracked the language used by the State Department, and despite the fact that he proposed that equal access to "religious sites" be part of future Israeli-Palestinian talks, his critics felt the need to pummel the candidate into submission because he had committed the unpardonable sins of displaying compassion for and finding fault in the behavior of both sides and because he had done so before an Arab American audience.

Evidence of the disdain O'Malley's critics have for my community was exemplified by comments made by a "Democratic strategist" Hank Sheinkopf and columnist Jeffery Goldberg. Sheinkopf was nasty saying "Obviously seeking support from any place he might find it, a desperate former governor...has lost all touch with reality". Goldberg was equally dismissive noting that "Martin O'Malley [was] not going after the Jewish vote"—as if they are the only voters who matter.'

http://www.aljazeerah.info/Opinion%20Editorials/2015/November/2%20o/Zionist%20Intolerance%20on%20Display%20Against%20Martin%20O'Malley%20for%20Criticizing%20Islamophobia%20By%20James%20Zogby.htm

Couldn't have a 'nicer' group of 'friends,' imo.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Zionist Intolerance on Display Against Martin O'Malley for Criticizing Islamophobia . (Original Post) elleng Nov 2015 OP
K & R Omaha Steve Nov 2015 #1
Intolerance for O'malley's balanced point of view is everywhere. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #2
I'm afraid you're right, guillaumeb. elleng Nov 2015 #3
Perhaps someone should explain to O'Malley that nuance and tolerance are simply guillaumeb Nov 2015 #4
Well THAT's clearly NOT gonna happen! elleng Nov 2015 #5
If we posit that approximately 40% of US adults are functionally illliterate, guillaumeb Nov 2015 #6
and democracy fails. elleng Nov 2015 #7
There was an election for governor in Illinois in 2014. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #8
I haven't read any of those 'will you vote' threads, elleng Nov 2015 #9
The Chicago Tribune, the main Illinois paper, is a right wing rag. guillaumeb Nov 2015 #10
Islamophobia crosses party lines. Koinos Nov 2015 #11

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
2. Intolerance for O'malley's balanced point of view is everywhere.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 06:16 PM
Nov 2015

Even at DU. Islamophobia is a national pastime that is not confined to people like Pamela Geller.

Only certain narratives about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict are deemed acceptable.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
4. Perhaps someone should explain to O'Malley that nuance and tolerance are simply
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 06:29 PM
Nov 2015

unacceptable. If he cannot write his entire political philosophy on an index card, (or on the palm of his hand a la Sarah Palin), he is unelectable.

elleng

(130,918 posts)
5. Well THAT's clearly NOT gonna happen!
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 06:32 PM
Nov 2015

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
6. If we posit that approximately 40% of US adults are functionally illliterate,
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 06:39 PM
Nov 2015

and studies in the US and Canada show that the 40% number is true for both countries, that means that 40% of possible voters are not able to process written information. That does not mean that they cannot be reached, or that they are not intelligent enough to understand arguments, but it could mean that in a country where television and other media constitute the main source of information for people, only those ideas that can fit in a 30 second spot will be broadcast.

Anyone who watched the most recent GOP "debate" will see that slogans and insults have replaced substance.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
8. There was an election for governor in Illinois in 2014.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:19 PM
Nov 2015

The winner, a right wing billionaire, was elected in a record low turnout of barely 34% of voters. He won by 53% to 47%.

The winner, Bruce Rauner, was actually elected by 24.9% of the electorate. Hardly a mandate, but it was treated as such by Rauner and the Chicago media. But when 66% of the voters cannot be bothered to vote, democracy might be on life support.

That said, how many posts have there been at DU wherein the poster mentions that if any Democratic candidate other than his/her preferred candidates is the nominee, the poster will sit out the election? I have seen far too many from people who post on a political site.

elleng

(130,918 posts)
9. I haven't read any of those 'will you vote' threads,
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 07:54 PM
Nov 2015

I guess I coddle myself. I will vote for whomever the Dem candidate is, even tho I prefer O'Malley significantly.

That Rauner guy is a real piece of work! I lived in Chicago for 10+ years, years ago, but still kind of follow the funny business there. Just won an award for the worst-run state, didn't it???

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
10. The Chicago Tribune, the main Illinois paper, is a right wing rag.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 08:01 PM
Nov 2015

They constantly talk about Illinois and the state of affairs as a mainly Democratic problem, without mentioning the real reasons for the financial problems.
1) Illinois has a regressive, flat income tax that is one of the lowest in the country. The main reason for the financial problems.
2) Illinois contributes more in Federal taxes than it receives. The neighboring Republican states all receive more in Federal tax dollars than they send to Washington. The second reason.

Correct these two problems and the state would do just fine.

Koinos

(2,792 posts)
11. Islamophobia crosses party lines.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 11:41 AM
Nov 2015

And the Israeli lobby has a lot of influence in Washington. It is getting hard to find support for Palestine. O'Malley is once again following principle, not polls. I believe that an O'Malley presidency would change a lot for the better in the Middle East.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Martin O'Malley»Zionist Intolerance on Di...