Bernie Sanders

liberalnarb

(4,532 posts) Tue Dec 22, 2015, 04:05 PM Dec 2015

Thanks Again, Debbie!

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Thanks Again, Debbie! (Original Post) liberalnarb Dec 2015 OP

It's so obvious SmittynMo Dec 2015 #1

In Order to address debate schedule concerns Debbie Wasserman Shultz. Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #2

Are we sure about the numbers? Wellstone ruled Dec 2015 #3

The next one is on Sunday... deathrind Dec 2015 #4

Just before Martin Luther King Day. BeanMusical Dec 2015 #8

I really thought my faith in the Democratic party had reached its low point (n/t) vi5 Dec 2015 #5

I have a suspicion on the reasons, but maybe I'm wrong... MadDAsHell Dec 2015 #6

She's counting on a big-ass corner office in HRC's administration. polichick Dec 2015 #7

They are undermining Democrats, period n2doc Dec 2015 #9

If republicans deathrind Dec 2015 #10

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)

1. It's so obvious

Reply to liberalnarb (Original post)

Tue Dec 22, 2015, 04:10 PM

Dec 2015

the corruption that is going on. 6M viewers? All time low? Yeah, let's reach out to the voters. Unbelievable!!!!

Thanks Deb, it worked out just like you thought it would.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)

2. In Order to address debate schedule concerns Debbie Wasserman Shultz.

Reply to liberalnarb (Original post)

Tue Dec 22, 2015, 04:11 PM

Dec 2015

In Order to address debate schedule concerns Debbie Wasserman Shultz.

Has moved the January debate to the day and time of the Super bowel since
'everyone will be watching TV anyway'

She went on to add that she was sorry about her earlier lies and will lie better next time .

She also said she is seeing an eye doctor about her constant blinking when answering questions by the press ........ Her doctor said it was an allergic reaction....to truth particles in the quantum level of bullshit.

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)

3. Are we sure about the numbers?

Reply to liberalnarb (Original post)

Tue Dec 22, 2015, 04:13 PM

Dec 2015

Remember Neilson is owned by Murdoch. As far as DWS,what a loser.

deathrind

(1,786 posts)

4. The next one is on Sunday...

Reply to liberalnarb (Original post)

Tue Dec 22, 2015, 04:23 PM

Dec 2015

Jan 17th...not sure what time (one site showed 9 ET)...

BeanMusical

(4,389 posts)

8. Just before Martin Luther King Day.

Reply to deathrind (Reply #4)

Tue Dec 22, 2015, 05:03 PM

Dec 2015

I guess that Black Lives Matter for HRC when it's convenient.

vi5

(13,305 posts)

5. I really thought my faith in the Democratic party had reached its low point (n/t)

Reply to liberalnarb (Original post)

Tue Dec 22, 2015, 04:25 PM

Dec 2015

MadDAsHell

(2,067 posts)

6. I have a suspicion on the reasons, but maybe I'm wrong...

Reply to liberalnarb (Original post)

Tue Dec 22, 2015, 04:31 PM

Dec 2015

I know the President has defend DWS and the debate schedule, but I believe she's refused to answer questions about it.

Am I wrong? Has she stated a logical reason for the schedule?

polichick

(37,152 posts)

7. She's counting on a big-ass corner office in HRC's administration.

Reply to liberalnarb (Original post)

Tue Dec 22, 2015, 04:49 PM

Dec 2015

n2doc

(47,953 posts)

9. They are undermining Democrats, period

Reply to liberalnarb (Original post)

Tue Dec 22, 2015, 09:17 PM

Dec 2015

Guess who is getting their message out to the average, uninformed, not particularly paying attention voter? We may ridicule the repubs, call them insane (with justification) but they are getting their nutcase base energized. DWS and co. seem to think that name recognition is the only thing needed to win. They are dead wrong.

deathrind

(1,786 posts)

10. If republicans

Reply to n2doc (Reply #9)

Wed Dec 23, 2015, 12:50 AM

Dec 2015

Do anything well it is getting their base energized that is for sure. The republican debates have been getting viewership in the low double digit millions according to TRMS segment I watched lastnight. So...yea the voter out there who has not really been paying much attention is seeing the republicans left and right and probably wondering where are the dems...

Reply to this discussion