Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumArticle: Pro-Clinton SuperPAC Pays For a Poll to Show Her Winning The Debate
Was this already posted? Did I miss that the much ballyhooed PPP poll, was paid for by David Brook or Brock or whatever his name is, SuperPAC?
"Pro-Clinton SuperPAC Pays For a Poll to Show Her Winning The Debate"
In what can only be viewed as a desperate move to try to sway public opinion online after the second debate, which show Bernie Sanders ahead 50-60 percentage points in every poll between here and Neptune, Team Clinton hired a pollster to drop something immediately after the event ended.
Of course that poll has her ahead 67% to 20% for Sanders you can laugh at it HERE
Now to be clear, many politicians hire pollsters to conduct polls to sometimes see where there strengths and their weaknesses are, even Bernie has hired a pollster. So that much isnt exactly news. But what is odd about this one is the disclosure that Correct The Record a Hillary Clinton SuperPAC paid for the poll and they are trying to pass it off as an accurate accounting of what happened on the debate stage on November 14, 2015 at Drake University.
Based on what were seeing online, a huge amount of people are finally beginning to understand how the pollsters come up with their data. People are waking up to the fact that the numbers can be swayed heavily based on who is participating in the polls. This particular polling company Public Policy Polling has a history of using a lot of landline phones and for the polls on the Democratic side, they call people that are normally dyed-in-the-wool Democrats. And as we know, those people are not where most of Bernies support comes from. Below is a screen shot of the poll. Gotta warn you though: This one is laughable.
Continues at link...
http://thebernreport.com/pro-clinton-superpac-pays-for-a-poll-to-show-her-winning-the-debate/
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)today to bash Hill supporters who keep pointing to that stupid poll.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)SandersDem
(592 posts)so sad
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)following the standards of her supporters as I understand them, she'd better tell them "to stop it" it no uncertain terms, and by tomorrow, or else she owns it.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)ejbr
(5,856 posts)She told Wall Street to "cut it out!" and look how that turned out.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)who stabbed you in the back on your side.
libodem
(19,288 posts)Disappointing.
mountain grammy
(26,648 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)She's using a "pull out all the stops" type of strategy regardless of the circumstances.
Duval
(4,280 posts)dismayed that a Pro=Clinton SuperPAC would stoop to such measures. I am so glad I'm for an honest candidate.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)But not surprising.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)This particular polling company Public Policy Polling has a history of using a lot of landline phones and for the polls on the Democratic side, they call people that are normally dyed-in-the-wool Democrats.
I'm a died-in-the-wool democrat...but I'm a progressive democrat.
discocrisco01
(1,666 posts)Yeah, I disagree with them totally. Bernie said the right things at the right time. Why does everybody call Hillary as the candidate of their choice in these polls?
Most people on the net support Bernie. I just do not see a pro-Hillary groundswell on support on the net. But maybe there is people who are not the most active people the net who will vote Hillary.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
bullwinkle428
(20,630 posts)the debate was over!
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)"Whatever It Takes" continues on.
beerandjesus
(1,301 posts)86% of racists thought Bernie won the debate, as opposed to 6% who thought Clinton won
91% of men who thought Hillary ought to get off the stage and make them a sandwich thought Bernie won, as opposed to 2% who thought Clinton won
EEO
(1,620 posts)Some telling satire...
Hillary: First Woman President Worth Death of Middle Class
And...
More at link...
azmom
(5,208 posts)Shameless