Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

leftcoastmountains

(2,968 posts)
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 06:31 PM Oct 2015

The Democratic debate revealed Sanders’ true strength

-snip-
Bernie Sanders was the clear winner in the first debate among candidates for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination. And it wasn’t because he is more “likable” than the front-runner, Hillary Clinton. He won because he is more honest.

Hillary Clinton's “likeability” has received a lot of attention over the years. Does she come across as warm and caring? Does she have a sense of humor? Is her laugh convincing? In the 2008 primaries, President Barack Obama famously offered his rival a backhanded compliment, calling her “likable enough.”

For some voters, or at least some Beltway pundits, likability is a compelling factor in deciding who to vote for. But for many of us, it is not. Some voters actually watch debates to discern the candidates’ beliefs on the issues of the day — and last night’s debate revealed far more about the candidates’ beliefs and priorities than it did about their temperaments.

The debate was promoted on CNN as a kind of cage fight for political nerds: “Democratic candidates in one another's face for the first time” read the text at the bottom of the screen. It lived up to the hype: Anderson Cooper, the moderator, was dogged in asking challenging questions and extracting clear and unambiguous answers from reluctant candidates. The tone of those answers was less aggressive; unlike in the Republican debates, the candidates voiced coherent and often reasonable opinions that revealed substantive differences in their views on policy. Only one candidate, Jim Webb, bragged about killing a man, and none spoke hatefully about women or Mexicans (though the fact that this makes the Democrats looks good speaks to the soft bigotry of low expectations!).

http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/10/how-the-democratic-debate-revealed-sanders-true-strength.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Democratic debate revealed Sanders’ true strength (Original Post) leftcoastmountains Oct 2015 OP
Yes, he came off as spontaneous rather than rehearsed Warpy Oct 2015 #1
A Well Written Critique cantbeserious Oct 2015 #2
Al Jazeera obviously didn't get the memo. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #3

Warpy

(111,359 posts)
1. Yes, he came off as spontaneous rather than rehearsed
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 06:44 PM
Oct 2015

which made for a few bobbles, like referring to himself in the third person. He needs to work on that one, most people find it jarring.

The others were polished enough that you knew they'd been rehearsed for all the cockamamie questions a soft-right MSM reporter was likely to ask.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
3. Al Jazeera obviously didn't get the memo.
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 07:02 PM
Oct 2015

Media was supposed to declare Hillary the winner, come on you guys, you're breaking ranks!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»The Democratic debate rev...