Bernie Sanders

Aerows

(39,961 posts) Sun Sep 20, 2015, 05:50 AM Sep 2015

Bernie Badger just don't care.

He's taking on the billionaires, the PACs, the SuperPACs, and whatever stinging remark sent his way.

The Bernie Badger just don't care! He just goes on, not giving a crap about what is confronting him, and still don't care.

Exhibit A: It also has white hair

Exhibit B: Others besides himself benefit.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bernie Badger just don't care. (Original Post) Aerows Sep 2015 OP

Bernie is the only Candidate from either party to take on the issues and connect the dots . And this orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #1

A good mascot for Bernie! He doesn't give a f*ck, he just goes after Wall Street anyway! Dustlawyer Sep 2015 #2

I think Bernie gives lots of fucks about lots of things. It's the right that merrily Sep 2015 #3

And the insurance companies and Big Pharma... LiberalElite Sep 2015 #4

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)

1. Bernie is the only Candidate from either party to take on the issues and connect the dots . And this

Reply to Aerows (Original post)

Sun Sep 20, 2015, 06:31 AM

Sep 2015

guy narrating could give the blow by blow commentary Bernie and his career deserve .

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)

2. A good mascot for Bernie! He doesn't give a f*ck, he just goes after Wall Street anyway!

Reply to Aerows (Original post)

Sun Sep 20, 2015, 07:17 AM

Sep 2015

merrily

(45,251 posts)

3. I think Bernie gives lots of fucks about lots of things. It's the right that

Reply to Dustlawyer (Reply #2)

Sun Sep 20, 2015, 08:12 AM

Sep 2015

doesn't give a fuck about anything but their respective selves. Bernie would have taken that snake to the vet hospital, even after it bit him.

But, you're correct. He doesn't give a fuck about Wall Street.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)

4. And the insurance companies and Big Pharma...

Reply to Dustlawyer (Reply #2)

Sun Sep 20, 2015, 10:07 AM

Sep 2015

he said in the fundraiser in NYC HE DOESN'T CARE WHAT THEY THINK!

Reply to this discussion